Notices
Autocross/Road SCCA Solo II, SCCA Club Racing, Redline Track Events, Speed Trial, Speed Ventures, Grand-Am Cup, JGTC, Procar Australia

Spring Rates Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-18-2018, 12:39 PM
  #1  
bcoffin23
New Member
Thread Starter
 
bcoffin23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: LONG BEACH
Posts: 175
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default Spring Rates Question

Hi Everyone,

I am running a fully stripped and caged 350z (~2800lb). I also have a true coilover setup with Buddy Club Spec Coilover Kit. I am running 10k front and 8k rear.

The rear feels light, and I am prone to oversteer. I am currently running a square setup on 17x9.5 wheels wrapped in 255/40/17 Federal RSRR.

Anyone else have a similar setup with different spring rates?
Old 08-18-2018, 03:44 PM
  #2  
guitman32
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
guitman32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,998
Received 108 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

That is way too stiff of a rear for the front rate in coilover config. Most people run a 4-500lbs split in true coilover.

Do you know your corner weights?
Old 08-18-2018, 03:47 PM
  #3  
guitman32
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
guitman32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,998
Received 108 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

To give you an idea that is the equivalent of running a ~1000lbs rear spring in OEM config, assuming a few things.
Old 08-18-2018, 05:53 PM
  #4  
bealljk
350Z-holic
iTrader: (13)
 
bealljk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Denver
Posts: 6,358
Received 1,282 Likes on 1,007 Posts
Default

I run a 12 upfront and a 8s in the rears, about 150lbs heavier (mostly upfront) and I dont feel that my back end is loose (albeit Im not tracking). Do you have adjustable sways and/or the ability to adjust up your rebound rate?

Interested to see what others chime in with?
Old 08-18-2018, 06:27 PM
  #5  
guitman32
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
guitman32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,998
Received 108 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

^If you tracked your setup, it would be loose. In terms of OEM spring position you are both running rear rates that are *significantly* higher than the fronts (like almost twice the rate eg. 560f/1000r, or 672/1000r). Typically aside from the kits that have "drift" in the name, you really dont see these kind of rates being used at the track. Im not saying that they cant be made to work either. That is why it is so important to

Corner weights need to be taken into account otherwise this conversation will just be a SWAG.
The following users liked this post:
bealljk (08-18-2018)
Old 08-18-2018, 11:13 PM
  #6  
bealljk
350Z-holic
iTrader: (13)
 
bealljk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Denver
Posts: 6,358
Received 1,282 Likes on 1,007 Posts
Default

^one thing that factored into my decision to go 4k difference is that my rear end is lighter than an OEM setup ... I dont know 'exactly' where I'm at but most my weight reduction has come off the middle and rear of the car, furthermore, most my additional weight (turbos/headers/IC) were added to the front of the car. The decision to go 12 f / 8 r is that I pick up a 10k spring and I can go 10f / 8r or 12f / 10r and see what I like.

Lastly - All I know is that I know almost nothing - if I knew a little more, I'd know nothing.
Old 08-19-2018, 08:10 AM
  #7  
bcoffin23
New Member
Thread Starter
 
bcoffin23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: LONG BEACH
Posts: 175
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by guitman32
^If you tracked your setup, it would be loose. In terms of OEM spring position you are both running rear rates that are *significantly* higher than the fronts (like almost twice the rate eg. 560f/1000r, or 672/1000r). Typically aside from the kits that have "drift" in the name, you really dont see these kind of rates being used at the track. Im not saying that they cant be made to work either. That is why it is so important to

Corner weights need to be taken into account otherwise this conversation will just be a SWAG.
Right now I am 650 on each rear wheel and 800 on each front (total car is actually 2898lb). What spring rates would you suggest? I am leaning towards 12k front and 6k rear, or possibly leave the 10k upfront and drop the rear to 5k.

Last edited by bcoffin23; 08-19-2018 at 09:02 AM.
Old 08-19-2018, 08:27 AM
  #8  
bealljk
350Z-holic
iTrader: (13)
 
bealljk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Denver
Posts: 6,358
Received 1,282 Likes on 1,007 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bcoffin23
total cal is actually 2898lb
impressive still ... especially considering you have a cage.
Old 08-19-2018, 09:03 AM
  #9  
bcoffin23
New Member
Thread Starter
 
bcoffin23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: LONG BEACH
Posts: 175
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bealljk
impressive still ... especially considering you have a cage.
Fully stripped with carbon doors and carbon hatch. My target weight for the car is 2800. I think with lightweight wheels, no passenger seat, lightweight battery, and removing the dash I could get close.
Old 08-19-2018, 10:47 AM
  #10  
guitman32
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
guitman32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,998
Received 108 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bcoffin23
Right now I am 650 on each rear wheel and 800 on each front (total car is actually 2898lb). What spring rates would you suggest? I am leaning towards 12k front and 6k rear, or possibly leave the 10k upfront and drop the rear to 5k.
I assume those weights are without you in it. They need to be with you in the car and actual weights, not just a swag, in order to make the calculations meaningful.

Either way you are going to need to drop that rear rate by quite a bit...5k (280lbs) is a good number for that level of tire (roughly 625lbs OEM spring equivalent - some go softer yet depending on tire aero tracks and driver preference). Though it still wont match the 10k front rates and youll continue to have a "loose" car at the limit. I would be looking at 14k front minimum in addition to dropping the rear. Really, you should just get a new setup bc with those dampers, who knows.
Old 08-19-2018, 03:28 PM
  #11  
bcoffin23
New Member
Thread Starter
 
bcoffin23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: LONG BEACH
Posts: 175
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by guitman32
I assume those weights are without you in it. They need to be with you in the car and actual weights, not just a swag, in order to make the calculations meaningful.

Either way you are going to need to drop that rear rate by quite a bit...5k (280lbs) is a good number for that level of tire (roughly 625lbs OEM spring equivalent - some go softer yet depending on tire aero tracks and driver preference). Though it still wont match the 10k front rates and youll continue to have a "loose" car at the limit. I would be looking at 14k front minimum in addition to dropping the rear. Really, you should just get a new setup bc with those dampers, who knows.
thank you for the info! I’m planning to get 12k front and 5 or 6k rear Swift springs on these dampers. It’s a common setup on them.

Not rumning any aero.
Old 08-19-2018, 05:48 PM
  #12  
guitman32
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
guitman32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,998
Received 108 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

A 12/5 split with those corner weights will put you at almost even front and rear frequencies, which is generally to be avoided by conventional wisdom...thats why I suggested the 14kg/5kg split. But I do understand wanting to work within your current damper, so if you do go with 12kg front it may be prudent to go with a 6kg rear even though it is on the looser side, to stagger the ride frequencies slightly. By the rough numbers though, esp without exact corner weights and other variables. And this is one of those areas where the devil is definitely in the details. But unless there is money on the line were just having fun anyway right.
Old 08-19-2018, 11:35 PM
  #13  
06platinumG
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
06platinumG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: NE Tacoma
Posts: 243
Received 15 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

My car is heavier than yours but I'm running a 14/7 set up with Swift springs on Zeal coil overs and been happy with it
Old 08-21-2018, 04:41 PM
  #14  
guitman32
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
guitman32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,998
Received 108 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bealljk
^one thing that factored into my decision to go 4k difference is that my rear end is lighter than an OEM setup ... I dont know 'exactly' where I'm at but most my weight reduction has come off the middle and rear of the car, furthermore, most my additional weight (turbos/headers/IC) were added to the front of the car. The decision to go 12 f / 8 r is that I pick up a 10k spring and I can go 10f / 8r or 12f / 10r and see what I like.

Lastly - All I know is that I know almost nothing - if I knew a little more, I'd know nothing.
Lol, so true. I am but a grasshopper. Im at 55r/45r...but cross is what matters. Have you seen how 991s scale out?...50% cross, yet 37/63 rear weight dist. For street driving in reality almost anything will work as long as the damping matches and you arent bottoming or topping out. In a perfect world, one would modify spring rates to suit specific tracks and conditions, which does happen in addition to modifying spring preload and gas pressure.
The following users liked this post:
bealljk (08-21-2018)
Old 08-21-2018, 10:57 PM
  #15  
bealljk
350Z-holic
iTrader: (13)
 
bealljk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: North Denver
Posts: 6,358
Received 1,282 Likes on 1,007 Posts
Default

I appreciate the time you put into this thread ... it's helped thus far!
The following users liked this post:
guitman32 (08-22-2018)
Old 08-24-2018, 09:29 AM
  #16  
bcoffin23
New Member
Thread Starter
 
bcoffin23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: LONG BEACH
Posts: 175
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Update:

I have confirmed that my rears are actually 6k, but my fronts are 10k.

We corner balanced the car today, and got the cross weights at 50/50. The front/rear is 54/46, however, so I need to get some more weight back there. The car weighs 2880 with 1/2 tank of gas without me in it.

I am planning to reroute the battery to behind the passenger seat. Would 12K front springs help move weight to the back?
Old 08-24-2018, 11:40 AM
  #17  
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (8)
 
terrasmak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 28,636
Received 2,283 Likes on 1,645 Posts
Default

12/5 is very close to the Nismo T2 rates. I ran that for a while, now running 16/6k but my car also has aero and a couple hundred more pounds.
Old 08-24-2018, 01:00 PM
  #18  
bcoffin23
New Member
Thread Starter
 
bcoffin23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: LONG BEACH
Posts: 175
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by terrasmak
12/5 is very close to the Nismo T2 rates. I ran that for a while, now running 16/6k but my car also has aero and a couple hundred more pounds.
I’m at 10/6 now though, which is a much different spring ratio than 12/5.

I dont plan on using Aero anytime soon since going chassis mount is my only option and not in the budget right now.

My my question is: would upping the front rates to 12k transfer static weight to the rear?
Old 08-24-2018, 02:14 PM
  #19  
terrasmak
Super Moderator
MY350Z.COM
iTrader: (8)
 
terrasmak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Sin City
Posts: 28,636
Received 2,283 Likes on 1,645 Posts
Default

Nothing but moving things or height adjustments will do anything for static weight.

If your at 10/6 now, I would probably just up to 14/6 , but ideallly I had more traction with the 5k rear.
Old 08-24-2018, 02:20 PM
  #20  
guitman32
New Member
iTrader: (15)
 
guitman32's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: South FL
Posts: 1,998
Received 108 Likes on 90 Posts
Default

Spring rate changes will not alter static weight dist.


Quick Reply: Spring Rates Question



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:06 AM.