Notices
Brakes & Suspension 350Z stoppers, coils, shocks/dampers

Cusco A Arms installed with alignment numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 4, 2005 | 05:55 PM
  #21  
V35's Avatar
V35
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Default

FL: camber: -1.5 Toe: -.04
FR Camber: -1.5 Toe: -.08


With Cusco A Arms, SPC camber arms and toe bolts and Volk LE37Ts 19" settings are:

FL Camber: -1.6 Toe: -.05
FR Camber: -1.3 Toe: -.05


Is it Just me or did you not get too much adjustment with the Cusco arms? I have -2.1 camer up front and i'm looking for a set of front arms that will bring it back closer to spec but it seems like the Cusco's don't offer much adjustment.
Reply
Old May 18, 2005 | 04:07 PM
  #22  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

-2.1 camber up front is not exactly excessive at all

I just redid my alignment today, trying to get a bit better turn in response, and a bit better exit feel.

Here is what I have now...I am only posting befores for the fronts, since we took the rears apart last night to adjust rideheight and put the rear arms in.
Current setup: Cusco Zero2's, Cusco front a arms, Kinetix rear traction arms and camber arms, Cusco sways, 245/40/18 front, 275/40/18 rear.

Front
Before Camber (L)-1.33 (R) -1.45
Before Caster (L)8.35 (R)8.80
Before Toe (L)0.00 (R)0.01

Camber(L) -2.10 (R)-1.98
Caster (L) 8.56 degrees (R) 8.85 degrees
Toe (out)(L) .03 (R) .04

Cross Camber -0.12
Cross Caster -0.27
Total Toe 0.07
Set back ? 0.37 - anyone have any clue what this is?

Rear:

Camber (L)-1.56 (R)-1.58
Toe (L) -.01 (R) -.01

On paper looks great....only thing is, the car drifts to the right now, and steering wheel is slightly cocked - back on the rack tomorrow. But, it turns in great and is very stable in the turns. I'll check tire pressure in the AM

Last edited by Z1 Performance; May 18, 2005 at 04:11 PM.
Reply
Old May 19, 2005 | 07:08 AM
  #23  
NismoGCoupe's Avatar
NismoGCoupe
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 585
Likes: 0
From: Jersey
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
-2.1 camber up front is not exactly excessive at all
-2.1 is not excessive? I though min was -1.3
Reply
Old May 19, 2005 | 07:14 AM
  #24  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

not excessive at all and will greatly improve turn in - toe wears the tires alot more than camber does
Reply
Old May 19, 2005 | 08:14 AM
  #25  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Yep, to ramp this platform up, some won't be comfortable with the camber numbers they need to run, especially in the G community I think. Though I don't think they're looking for that type of setup in general.
Reply
Old May 19, 2005 | 08:19 AM
  #26  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

I'd def agree - people see the number and tend to "freak out", when fact its a relatively minor change relative to stock, and pays big dividends
Reply
Old May 19, 2005 | 08:24 AM
  #27  
V35's Avatar
V35
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Default

So with my -2.1 front and -1.3 rear camber, do you think that I would just be wasting $400 on buying the front A-arms for the minimal adjustment that I will get from it?
Reply
Old May 19, 2005 | 08:35 AM
  #28  
Gsedan35's Avatar
Gsedan35
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 3,121
Likes: 7
From: Central California
Default

Originally Posted by V35
So with my -2.1 front and -1.3 rear camber, do you think that I would just be wasting $400 on buying the front A-arms for the minimal adjustment that I will get from it?

Your at -2.1 AFTER the Cusco arm install!? Question I have to know, how low is your car set? And what were the before numbers?
Reply
Old May 19, 2005 | 08:41 AM
  #29  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

I think he saying his car is at -2.1 before the a arm install

I was just going to ask what the rideheight was too

My car is exactly 25 inches from the center of the fender line to the ground. That gave a "natural" camber of -2.1 degrees pre a arm install. Post a arm install I can get down to -1.3 on the a arms if I want
Reply
Old May 19, 2005 | 09:56 AM
  #30  
konspec's Avatar
konspec
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
From: pa
Default

I'm def. getting these arms soon, I'm dropped about 2in so tire wear is crazy. I cearly am getting these to improve tire wear but I don't want stock settings. For the events I attend I like a little oversteer so i still want streetable wear has anyone found the sweet spot? (adam)
Reply
Old May 19, 2005 | 03:51 PM
  #31  
V35's Avatar
V35
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: so cal
Default

Yea, im -2.1 BEFORE a-arm install. I don't exactly know how low my car is set. Hopefully I can get it down to -1.3 with these Cusco arms.
Reply
Old May 22, 2005 | 02:17 PM
  #32  
kgb's Avatar
kgb
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 212
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default

Originally Posted by V35
FL: camber: -1.5 Toe: -.04
FR Camber: -1.5 Toe: -.08


With Cusco A Arms, SPC camber arms and toe bolts and Volk LE37Ts 19" settings are:

FL Camber: -1.6 Toe: -.05
FR Camber: -1.3 Toe: -.05


Is it Just me or did you not get too much adjustment with the Cusco arms? I have -2.1 camer up front and i'm looking for a set of front arms that will bring it back closer to spec but it seems like the Cusco's don't offer much adjustment.

I went with EVO A-arms; the Tech that aligned my car said I had enough adjustment to go to +.5. The car was sitting at -1.9 and -1.7--I have Tein Basics. ...had the camber adjusted to -.3. ..."feathering" stopped also.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 02:55 AM
  #33  
herbGT350808's Avatar
herbGT350808
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Waipahu, HI
Default

Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
Yeah before with just B&G springs and stock 17s my settings were

FL: camber: -1.5 Toe: -.04
FR Camber: -1.5 Toe: -.08
RL Camber: -2.0 Toe: .20
RR Camber: -2.3 Toe: .04


With Cusco A Arms, SPC camber arms and toe bolts and Volk LE37Ts 19" settings are:

FL Camber: -1.6 Toe: -.05
FR Camber: -1.3 Toe: -.05
RL Camber: -1.3 Toe: 0.0
RR Camber: -1.2 Toe: 0.0
Why can't the final FL and FR atlease be both the same at -1.6? Thanks
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 04:08 AM
  #34  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

because he has lowering springs only, which very typically lower one side slightly more than the other - virtually every car is like this - plus he has fitted aftermarket wheels and tires which alter the final alignment settings
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 07:41 AM
  #35  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
because he has lowering springs only, which very typically lower one side slightly more than the other - virtually every car is like this - plus he has fitted aftermarket wheels and tires which alter the final alignment settings
Damn you make me sound all f@cked up Yes what he said is correct. Lowering springs are never even side to side. I'm switching to some Swift springs and Tokico D Specs soon which should raise the car a bit and hopefully make it more even.
Reply
Old Dec 2, 2005 | 10:42 AM
  #36  
herbGT350808's Avatar
herbGT350808
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
From: Waipahu, HI
Default

Then will it make it precisely even with coilovers?
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 08:45 AM
  #37  
Z1 Performance's Avatar
Z1 Performance
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 5
From: Long Island, New York
Default

part of the benefit with a coilover is you can make rideheight side to side completely even.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 09:37 AM
  #38  
JDMFairlady21's Avatar
JDMFairlady21
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 1
From: LI, NY
Default

i was curious about the stock vs 19/9.5 and 19/10.5 camber and toes settings
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 06:40 PM
  #39  
350Zteve's Avatar
350Zteve
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 2
From: So. Cal.
Default

What bushings come with these? Are they urethane? Spherical? Rubber?
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2005 | 07:17 PM
  #40  
JDMFairlady21's Avatar
JDMFairlady21
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,853
Likes: 1
From: LI, NY
Default

i think they come wit urethane bushings
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:03 AM.