stupid spring rate question
Why does the 350Z spring rates have to be so high compared to cars like the RX-8 and S2000 to get good handeling? Those other cars have something (besides weight) better than us?
Just wondering =p
Just wondering =p
The Z uses 314*/342*, what does the RX8 and S2000 use?
*car's built after 11/30/03 are supposed to use a slightly higher spring rate as part of revised suspension settings, until I get my hands on a set, I can't give a amount on post 11/30/03 cars till then.
*car's built after 11/30/03 are supposed to use a slightly higher spring rate as part of revised suspension settings, until I get my hands on a set, I can't give a amount on post 11/30/03 cars till then.
Originally posted by Gsedan35
The Z uses 314*/342*, what does the RX8 and S2000 use?
*car's built after 11/30/03 are supposed to use a slightly higher spring rate as part of revised suspension settings, until I get my hands on a set, I can't give a amount on post 11/30/03 cars till then.
The Z uses 314*/342*, what does the RX8 and S2000 use?
*car's built after 11/30/03 are supposed to use a slightly higher spring rate as part of revised suspension settings, until I get my hands on a set, I can't give a amount on post 11/30/03 cars till then.
Originally posted by lawnmore
I'm confused! On several posts on this sight stock spring rates have been stated at F347-R419. I'm considering Tein H tech to "soften" my ride and they are rated atF358 R375,what am I suppose to make of all the conflicting info?
I'm confused! On several posts on this sight stock spring rates have been stated at F347-R419. I'm considering Tein H tech to "soften" my ride and they are rated atF358 R375,what am I suppose to make of all the conflicting info?
Originally posted by lawnmore
I'm confused! On several posts on this sight stock spring rates have been stated at F347-R419. I'm considering Tein H tech to "soften" my ride and they are rated atF358 R375,what am I suppose to make of all the conflicting info?
I'm confused! On several posts on this sight stock spring rates have been stated at F347-R419. I'm considering Tein H tech to "soften" my ride and they are rated atF358 R375,what am I suppose to make of all the conflicting info?
So, I am sorry for the confusion, I hope I've cleared it up for you. Corrected oem rates are 314/342.
Originally posted by ZZtopp
I believe the H-tech's ratings are at full compression. The springs are progressive, while the OEM's are linear. The H-Tech's are softer at low to mid compression.
I believe the H-tech's ratings are at full compression. The springs are progressive, while the OEM's are linear. The H-Tech's are softer at low to mid compression.
Eibach and Kg/mm are the only two Z33 spring makers that admit what their initial spring rates are in addition to their final rates.
Trending Topics
Originally posted by 350ZOWNZ
RX-8s are
Stock RX8 6spd
F 155.61 lb/in
R 112.86 lb/in
thats like ALOT lower than the 350Z (no wonder it has a nicer ride?)
RX-8s are
Stock RX8 6spd
F 155.61 lb/in
R 112.86 lb/in
thats like ALOT lower than the 350Z (no wonder it has a nicer ride?)
On the oem RX8 and S2000 spring rates vs the Z. One thing we have to know is the motion rates of both cars. In other words, how much of the springs force actually is leveraged to the wheel of either car(wheel rate). For example on the 350Z (G35 too) the front motion rate is .79 and the rear is .36 That means that for every 100lbs of spring rate 79lbs is exerted at the front wheels and in the rear 36lbs is exerted on the rear wheels for every 100lbs of spring rate. The S2000 and RX8 may have very high motion rates where the cars place their springs closer to the wheels to leverage more spring stiffness to the wheel.
Let's apply the Z's moton rates to get the wheel rates. First number is the spring rate followed by the actual rate leveraged at the wheel (wheel rate)
Front:314=248 Rear:342=123
What "if" the RX8 had motion rates of .90 and .65
Front 156=140 Rear 113=73
The Z is still higher of course.
Then, how does the after market dial in the spring rates for the RX8 and S2000? Here's Tein's take on that.
Tein flex RX8 504/391
Tein flex 350Z 671/671
(original flex system used 556/556 rates as do the JDM ones now)
Tein flex S2000 559/671
S-tech S2000 296/363
S-tech RX8 207/145
S-tech 350Z 386/402
I'm not a expert, but the above are somethings that crossed my mind on the subject.
Last edited by Gsedan35; Jul 11, 2004 at 11:46 PM.
Originally posted by Gsedan35
Let me undue your confusion. I am the source of the 347/419 oem rate info. I discovered a few months ago that I was in error and I did a post to correct myself. Problem is, not everyone say the correction post as the previous data keeps popping up. Of note is the fact that Hotchkis tested the oem springs and say's they are 310/350. We are close enough to each other to confirm each other. The difference between us can be explained by normal coil spring rate testor +or- error.
So, I am sorry for the confusion, I hope I've cleared it up for you. Corrected oem rates are 314/342.
Let me undue your confusion. I am the source of the 347/419 oem rate info. I discovered a few months ago that I was in error and I did a post to correct myself. Problem is, not everyone say the correction post as the previous data keeps popping up. Of note is the fact that Hotchkis tested the oem springs and say's they are 310/350. We are close enough to each other to confirm each other. The difference between us can be explained by normal coil spring rate testor +or- error.
So, I am sorry for the confusion, I hope I've cleared it up for you. Corrected oem rates are 314/342.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




