How much rwhp is the VQ35 capable of strictly NA?
I'd like to know the *precise* difference between brake horsepower and wheel horsepower.
I don't really know a whole lot about aftermarket tuning. If I could keep solid reliability with FI I would do it, but my guess is that every extra bit of power you force the engine to produce reduces the realiability of that engine by an equivalent amount, assuming stock internals. Thus the reason for building up a motor.
I don't really know a whole lot about aftermarket tuning. If I could keep solid reliability with FI I would do it, but my guess is that every extra bit of power you force the engine to produce reduces the realiability of that engine by an equivalent amount, assuming stock internals. Thus the reason for building up a motor.
i think the pulley and clutch/flywheel are different in terms of showing measurable whp because the pulley is having an effect on other pullies and is actually physically part of the engine. The flywheel is not part of the engine. It's a point where there can be drivetrain loss
bhp = engine hp. Car manufacturers use this number because it's higher and therefore sounds cooler and is more universal/accurate. But since people don't measure their power in their car by taking the engine out and putting it in an expensive engine dyno, people measure hp at the wheels
whp = hp measured at the wheels = how much the wheels turn being an indication of of real world hp at that given location/time. There's more varience with this number since there's different manufacturers of wheel dynos and elevation/temp/ECU/gas octane/alignment of planets etc
Originally Posted by RVM
I'd like to know the *precise* difference between brake horsepower and wheel horsepower.
bhp = engine hp. Car manufacturers use this number because it's higher and therefore sounds cooler and is more universal/accurate. But since people don't measure their power in their car by taking the engine out and putting it in an expensive engine dyno, people measure hp at the wheels
whp = hp measured at the wheels = how much the wheels turn being an indication of of real world hp at that given location/time. There's more varience with this number since there's different manufacturers of wheel dynos and elevation/temp/ECU/gas octane/alignment of planets etc
Last edited by sentry65; Sep 4, 2005 at 04:18 PM.
Dammit, I already knew that. I thought there was some super sekret definition I was missing out on!
Originally Posted by sentry65
i think the pulley and clutch/flywheel are different in terms of showing measurable whp because the pulley is having an effect on other pullies and is actually physically part of the engine. The flywheel is not part of the engine. It's a point where there can be drivetrain loss
bhp = engine hp. Car manufacturers use this number because it's higher and therefore sounds cooler and is more universal/accurate. But since people don't measure their power in their car by taking the engine out and putting it in an expensive engine dyno, people measure hp at the wheels
whp = hp measured at the wheels = how much the wheels turn being an indication of of real world hp at that given location/time. There's more varience with this number since there's different manufacturers of wheel dynos and elevation/temp/ECU/gas octane/alignment of planets etc
bhp = engine hp. Car manufacturers use this number because it's higher and therefore sounds cooler and is more universal/accurate. But since people don't measure their power in their car by taking the engine out and putting it in an expensive engine dyno, people measure hp at the wheels
whp = hp measured at the wheels = how much the wheels turn being an indication of of real world hp at that given location/time. There's more varience with this number since there's different manufacturers of wheel dynos and elevation/temp/ECU/gas octane/alignment of planets etc
BHP is really butt horsepower. its measured at the seat of your pants and can be done most anywhere. it gives the most accurated feeling and rewards with the greatest excitement/adrenaline.
Sponsor
Performance Nissan
Performance Nissan
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,783
Likes: 3
From: So-Cal - Ready to go?
Originally Posted by CUxtopher
can you give an estimate of what it took?
how reliable was the engine?
how reliable was the engine?
we also have a motor that does over 400HP on the engine dyno...
Originally Posted by sentry65
i think the pulley and clutch/flywheel are different in terms of showing measurable whp because the pulley is having an effect on other pullies and is actually physically part of the engine. The flywheel is not part of the engine. It's a point where there can be drivetrain loss
Rotating mass is rotating mass, regardless where on the car it comes from. The more you can take off, the more power makes it to the ground. You have not produced any gross hp...you have only increased your net.
Originally Posted by sentry65
bhp = engine hp. Car manufacturers use this number because it's higher and therefore sounds cooler and is more universal/accurate. But since people don't measure their power in their car by taking the engine out and putting it in an expensive engine dyno, people measure hp at the wheels
Originally Posted by Jason@Performance
I've been speaking with a builder that does mostly race engines. He's saying 20k CND for 400whp NA. According to him, the idle wouldn't be too bad and it would rev to 8500rpm. Cams would be custom, and I could hit it with a 75 to 100 shot for special occasions.
Sponsor
Performance Nissan
Performance Nissan
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 8,783
Likes: 3
From: So-Cal - Ready to go?
upgrade to ligher rods if anything...
but save your self some money... just upgrade the connecting rod bolts... youll beable to get 7800 RPM and pleanty of power withthe stock bottom end, new cams / valve... and engine mangement...
but save your self some money... just upgrade the connecting rod bolts... youll beable to get 7800 RPM and pleanty of power withthe stock bottom end, new cams / valve... and engine mangement...
Thanks for the info Jason... I am sure you guys know more about VQ35DE's limitation than most of the people since you guys build vq35 engines for racing...
Also Peter Pilkington who races/builds his 350Z in Australia also said that it is fine to rev it up to 7500rpm with just the rod bolts swapped out, they haven't had any problem with the engine at all...
cheers!!!
richie
Also Peter Pilkington who races/builds his 350Z in Australia also said that it is fine to rev it up to 7500rpm with just the rod bolts swapped out, they haven't had any problem with the engine at all...
cheers!!!
richie
As far as a lightweight flywheel ADDING horsepower, that won't happen. All it's doing is freeing up lost horsepower due to drivetrain loss. That's why a car with 287 BHP will only dyno at 220-240 WHP. Say it dynos at 230 WHP. Add a light flywheel and that number will go up. Not additional HP, but just free'd HP that was already there, just lost in making **** turn. But I do understand where you all are coming from. It's not adding.
Example: My '96 Eclipse GS-T dyno'ed 199.3 WHP/216.8 WTQ before installing my ACT Streetlite. After, it dyno'ed 202.9 WHP/218.6 WTQ. Same dyno, next day, same boost, no other different mods.
Example: My '96 Eclipse GS-T dyno'ed 199.3 WHP/216.8 WTQ before installing my ACT Streetlite. After, it dyno'ed 202.9 WHP/218.6 WTQ. Same dyno, next day, same boost, no other different mods.
What compression to you guys think should be used to get maximum power, but keep it driveable on 93 octane? I was thinking maybe 12.0:1 or so. I would like to be able to get Porsche GT3 power or more and it is running a 11.7:1.
Originally Posted by Jason@Performance
upgrade to ligher rods if anything...
but save your self some money... just upgrade the connecting rod bolts... youll beable to get 7800 RPM and pleanty of power withthe stock bottom end, new cams / valve... and engine mangement...
but save your self some money... just upgrade the connecting rod bolts... youll beable to get 7800 RPM and pleanty of power withthe stock bottom end, new cams / valve... and engine mangement...
Is it just a matter of dropping the oil pan, swapping the bolts, and then installing a new oil pan gasket?
Originally Posted by thawk408
The site says "Horsepower approximately 350hp at 7000 rpm. Torque approximately 290 lb-ft at 5700 rpm.". Is this at the wheels or the crank?
Originally Posted by thawk408
What compression to you guys think should be used to get maximum power, but keep it driveable on 93 octane? I was thinking maybe 12.0:1 or so. I would like to be able to get Porsche GT3 power or more and it is running a 11.7:1.
With 93 octane I would say 11.5 and anything over and your pushing the limits of the fuel.
Originally Posted by sentry65
yeah i know the difference
I'm just going to have to agree to disagree with you then.
An engine makes a set amount of power - 287 bhp
it has a certain amount of mechanical limitations that mean by the time the power gets to the wheels it's making 235whp or so depending on dyno/temp/elevation/gas octane/ECU mapping, etc
if you add a tilton clutch, it's not going to put you at 240whp. Why? because even though you're taking the weight off of the drivetrain so that in theory the 15% or whatever drivetrain loss should be less, it really isn't. The only way for it to be less is if you have physically different setup as in the driveshaft was half as long or there were half as many junction locations where the hp can be lost - or the rubber transmission and engine mounts were converted to solid metal ones. But just taking weight off the physical parts will do nothing but YES shift the power curve forward a little more. It won't make your 287bhp engine work any harder to produce a higher peak whp number
I'm just going to have to agree to disagree with you then.
An engine makes a set amount of power - 287 bhp
it has a certain amount of mechanical limitations that mean by the time the power gets to the wheels it's making 235whp or so depending on dyno/temp/elevation/gas octane/ECU mapping, etc
if you add a tilton clutch, it's not going to put you at 240whp. Why? because even though you're taking the weight off of the drivetrain so that in theory the 15% or whatever drivetrain loss should be less, it really isn't. The only way for it to be less is if you have physically different setup as in the driveshaft was half as long or there were half as many junction locations where the hp can be lost - or the rubber transmission and engine mounts were converted to solid metal ones. But just taking weight off the physical parts will do nothing but YES shift the power curve forward a little more. It won't make your 287bhp engine work any harder to produce a higher peak whp number
Originally Posted by sentry
it's the same as if saying if you could take a 350Z and make it lose 2000 lbs that it'll raise it's top speed - just isn't true. It'd be godlike at accelleration, but top speed won't increase
Theoretical top speed would remain the same, but actual top speed should increase.
Ok, this is just a hypothetical situation.
Could you list what you would do to the engine with a $20k limit, excluding FI/NO2, and what would the expected power be?
ANyone make a stroker kit, or just the crankshaft? If so, how much? What is the displacement increase?
What's the compression ratio? Any room for an increase? Like close to 11:1. Of course you'd want to increase to 93 OC gas.
Any room to overbore the cylinders? If so how much?
How about changing out the pistons and rods for lightweight/stronger aftermarket ones? That'd allow the engine to rev a bit quicker, correct?
Head port and polish? New cams? Change the computer with a custom EFI system. Possibly multiple throttle bodies, this would take you over $10k though, and it'd be more appropriate for FI.
ANyways, you get the point. I'm just asking what can be done, and what will the results be?







