Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

Turbo Kit for 350Z

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 21, 2003 | 08:25 AM
  #41  
bluetouring350's Avatar
bluetouring350
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
From: jacksonville, fl
Default

I would go with the single turbo option, why pay the extra money for another turbo if you dont need it? A T-04 would be perfect for this engine, 10 psi is nowhere near the potential of the turbo. With the stock internals it will be hard to dial up much boost but come on guys 400 hp is a lot in a little car. If you dialed the T-04 to 30 psi you would have about 600+hp. Who needs a supra? All it will take is some low compression pistons and fuel systems.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2003 | 03:30 PM
  #42  
inG35coupe's Avatar
inG35coupe
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
From: Georgia
Default

Originally posted by D'oh
Axis,

(but like I said, I will most likely go N/A or stay stock)

-D'oh!
NA is stock. NA Naturally Aspirated. I'm not being a smart@$$, I just corrected you.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2003 | 04:56 PM
  #43  
BurnOutz's Avatar
BurnOutz
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
From: Hercules
Default

Originally posted by inG35coupe
NA is stock. NA Naturally Aspirated. I'm not being a smart@$$, I just corrected you.
I think what he meant was that he would either leave the car as is or, if he were to ever mod it, then he would rather stick with the N/A route rather than go FI.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 03:58 AM
  #44  
350zhawaii's Avatar
350zhawaii
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Hawaii
Default

option 2
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 04:48 AM
  #45  
sschmuve's Avatar
sschmuve
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix AZ
Default

Option 1
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 05:08 PM
  #46  
Strange's Avatar
Strange
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
From: Savannah Ga
Default

Lag..what Lag. Are you kidding me, a small single putting out 400 hp on a 3.5L 6 will have almost no lag. I had a single turbo Supra with over 500RWHP and it spooled faster than the stock twins. Believe me, simple is better. Also a single= less weight and fewer things to go wrong.
Just my 2 cents.

PS
the real questions is: is 400 RWHP all the 350 can support with stock internals. Not flaming but just wondering how bullet proof the engine is??

Last edited by Strange; Mar 23, 2003 at 05:11 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 05:24 PM
  #47  
Zyal8tr's Avatar
Zyal8tr
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: MS
Default

My question is when in the hell are we gonna stop talking about what its supposedly gonna do and someone actually sell a damn turbo kit. I wanna see some STATS!
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2003 | 05:42 PM
  #48  
Ore417's Avatar
Ore417
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
From: Miami
Default Bit off topic

Can the stock Automatic tranny hold up that much horses (400hp)? and a little bit off topic here.... James, how much was it to mod up that Q45, you know, the grand total?
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2003 | 02:49 PM
  #49  
calc1's Avatar
calc1
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
From: San Diego, California
Default Option 1

Would put up with a little extra lag time for the cost savings. Even $5K makes me nervous.

cal
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2003 | 03:10 PM
  #50  
Sudou's Avatar
Sudou
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 0
From: Washington DC
Default

this thread should have been a poll
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2003 | 06:20 PM
  #51  
TJZ's Avatar
TJZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 806
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, Florida
Default

Option 1
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2003 | 08:09 PM
  #52  
hyperxmr2's Avatar
hyperxmr2
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: nowhere
Default

any thoughts when designing the turbos to have it able to fit the g35 coupes? i mean if it would fit 2 cars you'll have a larger market. if your making a single kit, where are you going to place the turbo? wouldn't two small t3, or gt25/28 be eaiser to fit into the tight engine bay? and really 7000 isnt even much for a twin kit, keep in mind hks twin gt28 kit retails over 9k and thant does't even come with a i/c. 7000 is a decent price in my mind, considering you pretty much getting two small turbo kits. but hey what do i know.
Reply
Old Mar 27, 2003 | 10:37 PM
  #53  
D'oh's Avatar
D'oh
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 1
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default

Originally posted by inG35coupe
NA is stock. NA Naturally Aspirated. I'm not being a smart@$$, I just corrected you.
What BurnOutz said.

I could stay NA but add cams, headers, forged pistons, ECU remap, stroker kit, etc. and it would no longer be stock, but still would be NA (not that those parts exist yet, but you get the idea).

I guess it was a bit confusing given the nature of this post, however.

Now, back on topic, any updates? My only thought on cost is that I think you really want to make sure it's done right. If I were to go turbo, I would be more willing to spend a certain amount money on a well designed, well engineered, single turbo kit than a slapped together twin turbo kit. As long as the turbo kit has a steady torque curve without any wicked peaks, then it still might work for curvy racing applications.

-D'oh!
Reply
Old Mar 28, 2003 | 06:35 PM
  #54  
zland's Avatar
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 48
From: Oceanside Ca
Default

Am I the only guy a little frustrated that we do not have any turbo on the market yet? We supposely got the Stillen SC but to my knowledge, no one has it on yet and no track or Dyno results. I think it is pathetic that Stillen does not have Dyno results posted with the product anyways.

Some of you might say that it is too early but from my perspective, the VQ motor has been out for years (maybe not 3.5L) so adapting it to the Z cannot be a year long engineering problem.

When I began 350z.com last year, a lot of talk was on how great this car would be to mod. To date, it seems we do not have a marketable ECU, Turbo, or anything else besides a louder sound with 5-12 hp. I am hoping I can push this motor out to or close to 400hp and still have dependability. Am I being unrealistic?

Nismo need to be in the USA as promised for starters.

Jeff
Reply
Old Apr 6, 2003 | 02:31 PM
  #55  
Del350's Avatar
Del350
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
From: canada
Default

Any word on a production date?
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 09:39 PM
  #56  
axis007's Avatar
axis007
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 46
Likes: 0
From: somewhere in Orange County
Default

still working on it,

the engine is really TIGHT on space,

if it works well, we will probably do one for the G35 coupe, it is basically the same car.
Reply
Old Apr 7, 2003 | 11:22 PM
  #57  
zland's Avatar
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 48
From: Oceanside Ca
Default

axis007:

Can You give us a little more detail of work in progress such as expect range of hp and issues still being worked on before release?
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2003 | 04:24 PM
  #58  
arpus809's Avatar
arpus809
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: new jersey
Default

Strange. I agree with you about a single being able to spool faster. I ha d a 94 supra with HKS 2835 turbos made as much as 809RWHP but the lag was bad. my buddy had a T78 made about the same power and even that turbo that is not ballbearing spooled faster.
Reply
Old Apr 8, 2003 | 09:36 PM
  #59  
GradZ's Avatar
GradZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Axis, I hope this turbo kit you're speaking of produces better numbers than the Greddy version. They're saying figures around the neighborhood of 345hp! Not 345WHP, 345HP!
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2003 | 03:29 AM
  #60  
mytalon's Avatar
mytalon
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
From: Tampa, Fl
Default

Power extreme has a 400+ kit. With a twin setup the turbo is only spooling of a bank of 3 cyl for each turbo with the single there are 6 to spool that is why it is faster. The point of the twins is to use smaller and spool faster to make the same power (stock) That is why the 300ZX had twins. I would think the theory would be a little different with the supras sequential setup.

I doubt that you could get a single on the 350 there isn't enough room to make both manifold meet at the single turbo. IMO. Stranger things have happened though.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 08:53 AM.