Notices
Engine & Drivetrain VQ Power and Delivery

replacing full injectors for performance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 05:34 AM
  #21  
350zHalleck's Avatar
350zHalleck
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,984
Likes: 8
From: Lost in a Dark Alley
Default

Don't listen to all these haters. they are just jealous at your ability to get the most power for less money when they didn't think of it first. You are a pioneer in this community and I applaud you for what you are doing.

Keep up the fight OP
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 06:49 AM
  #22  
gabez33's Avatar
gabez33
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 1
From: SATX
Default

Originally Posted by travlee9374
how ya figure.... intakes, art pipes, tdx2 and tune......
intakes, art pipes, tdx2 and tune only gained you 15rwhp over your stock baseline?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 07:08 AM
  #23  
travlee's Avatar
travlee
Master
Premier Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49,724
Likes: 9,296
From: Texas
Default

Originally Posted by gabez33
intakes, art pipes, tdx2 and tune only gained you 15rwhp over your stock baseline?
yes sir..... but I am still on average 25 over my de buddies
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 07:23 AM
  #24  
gabez33's Avatar
gabez33
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,035
Likes: 1
From: SATX
Default

Originally Posted by travlee9374
yes sir..... but I am still on average 25 over my de buddies
same dyno? what kind of dyno.....Although dyno numbers should be taken with a grain of salt, as a tuning tool, if you not seeing expected or common gains from your mods, id be ..... Makes no sense, you should be closer to but not at 300 with those mods. I made 26rw on my DE back in the day over baseline at UPREV.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 07:26 AM
  #25  
travlee's Avatar
travlee
Master
Premier Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49,724
Likes: 9,296
From: Texas
Default

yes same dyno it was a mustang, so 286 on that would be around (if 8% low) 309 on a dynojet, (if 5% low) 300. I can tell a diff by all means....
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 09:29 AM
  #26  
phunk2's Avatar
phunk2
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 329
Likes: 5
From: chicago
Default

mustangs dont read a percentage different than dynojets, they just read differently. Only way to get Dynojet numbers is to run a dynojet
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 09:34 AM
  #27  
travlee's Avatar
travlee
Master
Premier Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49,724
Likes: 9,296
From: Texas
Default

they read low compared to the others..... just like dynapak read high.... not to mention how the have it calibrated also can make it read low or high

my tuner said they run anywhere from 5-10% lower, those numbers i just threw out as an example
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 10:42 AM
  #28  
phunk2's Avatar
phunk2
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 329
Likes: 5
From: chicago
Default

in their standard configuration they generally read lower than a dynojet, but again, not by any percentage.

however, most mustang dyno operators add a user input correction factor in attempt to emulate dynojet numbers. so they will put on 10-15% or whatever they need to feel better. In most cases this is an over-correction and actually higher than a dynojet, but still not in ALL cases since, again, there is no static percentage to convert between the two.

due to countless discrepancies, the ONLY way to know your dynojet numbers is to run on a dynojet. Dynojet only allows industry standard environmental correction factors to be applied. This is what makes dynojet the best dyno to use for comparing numbers across the internet. Dynos such as Mustang dynos, while just as good of tools as a dynojet, are pretty much worthless for comparison because nobody has any idea what they are set to.

Last edited by phunk2; Aug 13, 2014 at 10:45 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 10:45 AM
  #29  
travlee's Avatar
travlee
Master
Premier Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49,724
Likes: 9,296
From: Texas
Default

true, i will one day (year) but not going out of my way to do it
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 10:50 AM
  #30  
Classy's Avatar
Classy
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,606
Likes: 615
From: Houston
Default

Trav, just boost your shiz and be done with this stoopid less than 300 hp numbers
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 10:52 AM
  #31  
travlee's Avatar
travlee
Master
Premier Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49,724
Likes: 9,296
From: Texas
Default

nah, sentimental value to the car...... i think i am pretty much done with it, need to do clutch and flywheel though
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 10:52 AM
  #32  
Classy's Avatar
Classy
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,606
Likes: 615
From: Houston
Default

Originally Posted by travlee9374
nah, sentimental value to the car...... i think i am pretty much done with it, need to do clutch and flywheel though
need a clutch/flywheel for that LS swap?
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 10:55 AM
  #33  
travlee's Avatar
travlee
Master
Premier Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49,724
Likes: 9,296
From: Texas
Default

not doing a swap, if i ever toast the motor then i will.... i still have the OEM in mine now, prob one of the last stock bolt on parts left
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 01:18 PM
  #34  
Classy's Avatar
Classy
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 7,606
Likes: 615
From: Houston
Default

Booooo
Reply
Old Aug 13, 2014 | 05:41 PM
  #35  
travlee's Avatar
travlee
Master
Premier Member
10 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 49,724
Likes: 9,296
From: Texas
Default

i know.... sorry to disappoint
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:13 PM.