I underlined some points of interest in your quotes. So, you contend that people thought the ***** were "new" and "hot", and that you yourself actually thought the ***** were "new" and "hot"? I don't recall reading one post ANYWHERE about how people thought the ***** were even remotely cool. Now that is not to say that no one thought they weren't cool, I cannot claim that my knowlege of all that has been posted is perfect, but if you look at the ***** i'm sure you'll agree they are nothing to write home about. Certainly not "new" and "hot", unless you still want to stick to that opinion. Remember we're talking specifically about the **** color and quality here for the AC/vents/heat.

I wish people would take a critical thinking class. You simply stated they weren't "horrid" on your second post. Now you are interjecting that you thought they were "new" and "hot" to somehow solidify that your rebuttle was valid. This is called "weasel wording". Allow me to quote you:


next point below

No kidding. I never stated that my opinion was everyone's opinion.


In conclusion I made some inflammatory comments, but it was out of frustration. No excuse really. I had felt that you didn't really read my original comment because you stated "But then again, I don't make a decision on buying a car base on a ****." I was trying to point out that the focal point of this post was "...that they always make improvements on first year cars, hence not making it worth it to buy them :P" That was the whole point of my comment back to you in the first place. You very quickly avoided that, and started arguing separate points.

 

My slang use of "zero" was meant to imply "none". Hence "no substance" Maybe you'll have to rearticulate yourself to help me understand your original implication. Because after re-reading it, your implication escapes me.