Personal pic/ babes section
#1
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pa
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Personal pic/ babes section
Since a new section was created for "politics" under the offtopic section how about a section for the personal pics/zbabes pictures. Its pretty apparent that these threads see alot more traffic than politics so why isn't there a personal/babes section. Also this would alleviate the NWS problems. The section could be titled NWS and for those that this is a problem they don't have to visit it.
Example threads with pretty high view counts.
Zbabes
lets see your wife/girlfriend
firegirl
you and you z
would you hit it
funny pics
twins
Plus others
Example threads with pretty high view counts.
Zbabes
lets see your wife/girlfriend
firegirl
you and you z
would you hit it
funny pics
twins
Plus others
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 4,084
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It's an idea, however, NWS girl pics are *technically* not allowed on the site.
P.S. I promise the mods and Vic look in the feedback section, but no one seems to believe me. lol
P.S. I promise the mods and Vic look in the feedback section, but no one seems to believe me. lol
#5
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pa
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 350zSpeedRacer
It's an idea, however, NWS girl pics are *technically* not allowed on the site.
P.S. I promise the mods and Vic look in the feedback section, but no one seems to believe me. lol
It's an idea, however, NWS girl pics are *technically* not allowed on the site.
P.S. I promise the mods and Vic look in the feedback section, but no one seems to believe me. lol
We still haven't received a definition from Victor on what is considered NWS. For most of us everything is WS. Like Drbonz said in a thread "People at work shouldn't be viewing anything that isn't work related anyway".
How is viewing a picture of girl different than a picture of anything while your at work? Now there is a difference, I am not saying pornography I'm saying pictures of girls posing by cars or just posing. But then again pornography can be considered many different things.
Balloons - Check out how many balloon fetish sites their are.
Animal Pictures, Disgusting
Clothed women
Smoking cigs
Bulging bellies
and the list goes on
There isn't really anything that isn't considered sexual to certain people , Nothing is considered perverse objectively, its how its perceived by the individual. What they learned to have sexual connotations. Ex. Why isn't the statue of David considered ****? Its a naked guy. Its because its what we learned.
Isn't viewing anything at work considered slacking off? Lets see I'll look at a pic for maybe 5 seconds or get into a political discussion for 5 minutes. You get the idea. I would much rather have my employees viewing pictures
We really need a definition to alleviate any further problems.
#7
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pa
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Thanks to those responding. I doubt this thread will last long or be viewed by enough people to make a difference since it was placed in this forum.
Anyway I doubt anything would come out of it since it was thought of by just a member not a MOD
Anyway I doubt anything would come out of it since it was thought of by just a member not a MOD
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: BRONX NY
Posts: 1,614
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
SPEEDY GIRL may have a womens point of view on this so we will also have a
hunky man
firefighter man
z hunks
thread for ladies
however i wont be starting since BRONX IS NO ***
hunky man
firefighter man
z hunks
thread for ladies
however i wont be starting since BRONX IS NO ***
#9
03 CS Track 6MT
iTrader: (5)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 2,841
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't get it, NWS ? Can you please post an example of a NWS pic so that we can make an informed decision. :8
Also if the only thing standing in the way is 350zsr then maybe she could just resign or retire or something. Just a suggestion.
Also if the only thing standing in the way is 350zsr then maybe she could just resign or retire or something. Just a suggestion.
#10
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pa
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by 35ounces
I don't get it, NWS ? Can you please post an example of a NWS pic so that we can make an informed decision. :8
Also if the only thing standing in the way is 350zsr then maybe she could just resign or retire or something. Just a suggestion.
I don't get it, NWS ? Can you please post an example of a NWS pic so that we can make an informed decision. :8
Also if the only thing standing in the way is 350zsr then maybe she could just resign or retire or something. Just a suggestion.
#12
no, the reason why i created the politics/war forum is because there are alot of threads regrading those topics.
there are not many topics on babes and such. yes the threads are high traffic and long but there are only a few of those threads.
and if they continue to have nudity i'll have to shut them all down.
there are not many topics on babes and such. yes the threads are high traffic and long but there are only a few of those threads.
and if they continue to have nudity i'll have to shut them all down.
#15
[QUOTE]Originally posted by hugo1669
Like Drbonz said in a thread "People at work shouldn't be viewing anything that isn't work related anyway". [QUOTE]
...and he (and the other mods) are considered "moral"
authority because.....? (There are some cool mods out there btw)
You got my vote Hugo.
Like Drbonz said in a thread "People at work shouldn't be viewing anything that isn't work related anyway". [QUOTE]
...and he (and the other mods) are considered "moral"
authority because.....? (There are some cool mods out there btw)
You got my vote Hugo.
#19
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sesame Street
Posts: 5,096
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I dont know why nudity isnt alowed on this site anyway. Most Z owners are over 18 anyway. America is so uptight about the nudity sex thing Playboy shows nudity and still comes across as a fairly tasteful mag, we should be able to pull it off too on this forum. I dont know why We all have to be treated like children.
#20
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Pa
Posts: 938
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by hugo1669
Thanks for the responce 350zsr , but I think you are the only one that gives us any responce. I thought that the feedback section was to get responces from the mods, notice the "s" or if a question is directed to a certain mod he would answer.
We still haven't received a definition from Victor on what is considered NWS. For most of us everything is WS. Like Drbonz said in a thread "People at work shouldn't be viewing anything that isn't work related anyway".
How is viewing a picture of girl different than a picture of anything while your at work? Now there is a difference, I am not saying pornography I'm saying pictures of girls posing by cars or just posing. But then again pornography can be considered many different things.
Balloons - Check out how many balloon fetish sites their are.
Animal Pictures, Disgusting
Clothed women
Smoking cigs
Bulging bellies
and the list goes on
There isn't really anything that isn't considered sexual to certain people , Nothing is considered perverse objectively, its how its perceived by the individual. What they learned to have sexual connotations. Ex. Why isn't the statue of David considered ****? Its a naked guy. Its because its what we learned.
Isn't viewing anything at work considered slacking off? Lets see I'll look at a pic for maybe 5 seconds or get into a political discussion for 5 minutes. You get the idea. I would much rather have my employees viewing pictures
We really need a definition to alleviate any further problems.
Thanks for the responce 350zsr , but I think you are the only one that gives us any responce. I thought that the feedback section was to get responces from the mods, notice the "s" or if a question is directed to a certain mod he would answer.
We still haven't received a definition from Victor on what is considered NWS. For most of us everything is WS. Like Drbonz said in a thread "People at work shouldn't be viewing anything that isn't work related anyway".
How is viewing a picture of girl different than a picture of anything while your at work? Now there is a difference, I am not saying pornography I'm saying pictures of girls posing by cars or just posing. But then again pornography can be considered many different things.
Balloons - Check out how many balloon fetish sites their are.
Animal Pictures, Disgusting
Clothed women
Smoking cigs
Bulging bellies
and the list goes on
There isn't really anything that isn't considered sexual to certain people , Nothing is considered perverse objectively, its how its perceived by the individual. What they learned to have sexual connotations. Ex. Why isn't the statue of David considered ****? Its a naked guy. Its because its what we learned.
Isn't viewing anything at work considered slacking off? Lets see I'll look at a pic for maybe 5 seconds or get into a political discussion for 5 minutes. You get the idea. I would much rather have my employees viewing pictures
We really need a definition to alleviate any further problems.
Since Mike was here and commented about posting nudity I think that is his answer????????????? So I guess nudity is the NWS hes been talking about all alot. Well NO KIDDING. Then why does everyone get their avatar changed for bikini or thong pics then????????? All you commented on was nudity so we can all assume that is your definition.