3.12 pulley Installed!
#1
3.12 pulley Installed!
Just wanted to share my results from the 3.12" (9lb) pulley install. Thanks McDuck for the install tips!
I installed the pulley on Saturday and took a run with my base fuel map. Then I spent the next 4 hours tweaking different maps with the R4 software and below are my results comparing my first run after the pulley install and my last run after tuning.
I'm making 9.9 psi at 6500rpm! I'm not quite sure why but I'm gonna stay away from the redline if at all possible.
I'll probably get it dynoed again at the first of the year to see what the HP #'s look like.
3.12"Before R4 tune 3.12"After R4 tune
RPM Boost PSI A/F Ratio Boost PSI A/F Ratio
2500 1.9 11.1 2.0 13.3
3000 2.6 11.1 2.6 13.0
3500 3.3 10.4 3.3 12.7
4000 4.2 10.1 4.2 12.4
4500 5.4 10.1 5.3 11.7
5000 6.5 10.0 6.4 10.4
5500 7.6 9.8 7.6 10.9
6000 8.7 9.7 8.7 10.9
6500 9.9 9.7 9.9 10.3
Enjoy
Steve
I installed the pulley on Saturday and took a run with my base fuel map. Then I spent the next 4 hours tweaking different maps with the R4 software and below are my results comparing my first run after the pulley install and my last run after tuning.
I'm making 9.9 psi at 6500rpm! I'm not quite sure why but I'm gonna stay away from the redline if at all possible.
I'll probably get it dynoed again at the first of the year to see what the HP #'s look like.
3.12"Before R4 tune 3.12"After R4 tune
RPM Boost PSI A/F Ratio Boost PSI A/F Ratio
2500 1.9 11.1 2.0 13.3
3000 2.6 11.1 2.6 13.0
3500 3.3 10.4 3.3 12.7
4000 4.2 10.1 4.2 12.4
4500 5.4 10.1 5.3 11.7
5000 6.5 10.0 6.4 10.4
5500 7.6 9.8 7.6 10.9
6000 8.7 9.7 8.7 10.9
6500 9.9 9.7 9.9 10.3
Enjoy
Steve
#3
Originally posted by mcduck
Steve, do you have figures for what you were boosting before you did the pulley swap?
Steve, do you have figures for what you were boosting before you did the pulley swap?
Here you go!
3.33" AA tuned
RPM Boost PSI A/F Ratio
2000 1.6 9.6
2500 2.2 9.6
3000 2.6 10.6
3500 2.9 10.4
4000 3.6 10.0
4500 4.3 9.6
5000 5.2 9.9
5500 6.2 9.9
6000 7.0 9.9
6500 7.9 9.9
6800 8.5 9.9
#6
Originally posted by booger
Good to see you got it on . What did you use to to datalog your runs on ? Or did you have it on a dyno to tune ?.....Bill
Good to see you got it on . What did you use to to datalog your runs on ? Or did you have it on a dyno to tune ?.....Bill
Trending Topics
#8
Originally posted by booger
Cool...I just dropped off a Zeitronix at the shop to go in my car . I should be breaking in the new motor by the end of the week
Cool...I just dropped off a Zeitronix at the shop to go in my car . I should be breaking in the new motor by the end of the week
#10
Originally posted by booger
9 to1 . Im putting on the 2.87 pulley after break in . Then I'll look into making a , or altering a smaller pulley on the blower
9 to1 . Im putting on the 2.87 pulley after break in . Then I'll look into making a , or altering a smaller pulley on the blower
#12
mcduck, I know what the math says about impeller speed etc. etc., but I may try the 2.62 pulley in the near future and see what happens. Who knows, the blower may be able to take it. No one has tried it yet, so no one really knows the answer.
My guess is that the Vortech would act more like a turbo (more of a kick than a linear boost pattern) with the 2.62, but you would have to pull so much timing that your top end power wouldn't be that good. Now on a low compression motor it is a different story.
My guess is that the Vortech would act more like a turbo (more of a kick than a linear boost pattern) with the 2.62, but you would have to pull so much timing that your top end power wouldn't be that good. Now on a low compression motor it is a different story.
#13
I think that the 2.62 maybe to small to grab the belt good enough . Besides...my 2.87 pulley [ havent figures out why ] was to small and tore up the outter edges of the jackshaft assembly that sticks out of the bracket . No one else has had that problem , but going to even a smaller pulley , will cause the same problem for every one