Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

single or TWIN?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2005 | 10:05 PM
  #1  
Boosting350Z's Avatar
Boosting350Z
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Palm Springs SoCal
Default single or TWIN?

why are some reasons some would chose a single VS a twin turbo set up, Or vice versa? what are the hp differences and what are the advantages or disadvantages over the other .. thank you in advance RD.
Reply
Old May 5, 2005 | 11:02 PM
  #2  
tommygunz's Avatar
tommygunz
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
From: Etobicoke,Ontario
Default

check out APS turbos....they give you quite the breakdown.
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 04:39 AM
  #3  
Zivman's Avatar
Zivman
New Member
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 7,179
Likes: 27
From: MPLS/ST.Paul MN
Default

Originally Posted by Boosting350Z
why are some reasons some would chose a single VS a twin turbo set up, Or vice versa? what are the hp differences and what are the advantages or disadvantages over the other .. thank you in advance RD.
in terms of aps ST vs TT I chose the TT for the following reasons:
1 - TT comes with cast manifolds
2 - TT less turbo lag - though this may not be the case in the real world
3 - TT bolts up to stock exhaust location
4 - Power potential is higher with TT

If your in Cali, you definitely want something that bolts up to stock exhaust location as to keep you looking a bit more stock. The APS TT kit has a chance of becoming CARB exempt, where as their ST kit doesn't
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 06:26 AM
  #4  
tonio's Avatar
tonio
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....99#post1409099
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 07:33 AM
  #5  
PoWeRtRiP's Avatar
PoWeRtRiP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 1
From: jacksonville, FL
Default

I actually prefer singles, lag is nice to me. it makes the power more noticeable when it comes in. your accellerating and its bogging a little, then all of a sudden your like oh S$#&!
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 01:11 PM
  #6  
webcarconnection's Avatar
webcarconnection
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

With the TT you have more WHP than the Single at the same PSI beside that both are A+ products for the Z
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 01:15 PM
  #7  
xxlbeerZ's Avatar
xxlbeerZ
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

If you're leaving the motor stock TT is a waste of money. ST is cheaper initially and the install is easier cheaper. IMO, ST is a much better choice for people like me using their car as a daily driver with stock internals.
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 01:31 PM
  #8  
tonio's Avatar
tonio
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: atlanta
Default

Why would a TT be a waste? A single could flow just as much as twins putting the same amount of stress on the stock internals.
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 01:45 PM
  #9  
webcarconnection's Avatar
webcarconnection
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by xxlbeerZ
If you're leaving the motor stock TT is a waste of money. ST is cheaper initially and the install is easier cheaper. IMO, ST is a much better choice for people like me using their car as a daily driver with stock internals.

Mine is a daily driver with stock internals!
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #10  
xxlbeerZ's Avatar
xxlbeerZ
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by tonio
Why would a TT be a waste? A single could flow just as much as twins putting the same amount of stress on the stock internals.
You seem to have missed the point. Since they both do the amount of HP the stock motor will handle, why spend extra money for horsepower you can't even utilize with the TT?
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 03:59 PM
  #11  
Bran_BranZ33's Avatar
Bran_BranZ33
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: Cumming GA
Default

Sorry to steal this thread but
-webcarconnection how many miles do you have on your turbos and have you had any
problems since install(like with stock internals and all)
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 04:23 PM
  #12  
Zcool's Avatar
Zcool
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 818
Likes: 0
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default

Originally Posted by webcarconnection
Mine is a daily driver with stock internals!

So is mine (APS TT). Now 5 months and 5,000 miles (2 track days) and no problems (414 RWHP at 8psi, 91 octane)
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 05:06 PM
  #13  
Gman2004's Avatar
Gman2004
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by xxlbeerZ
You seem to have missed the point. Since they both do the amount of HP the stock motor will handle, why spend extra money for horsepower you can't even utilize with the TT?

Maybe once you feel the power you will want more. The TT will be more expensive at first, but when you end up selling you ST to buy a TT the ST will cost you a whole lot more. This happened to me, only I bought a s/c and 3 weeks later sold it....lost a couple grand between parts and labor.
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #14  
xxlbeerZ's Avatar
xxlbeerZ
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,593
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Gman2004
Maybe once you feel the power you will want more. The TT will be more expensive at first, but when you end up selling you ST to buy a TT the ST will cost you a whole lot more. This happened to me, only I bought a s/c and 3 weeks later sold it....lost a couple grand between parts and labor.
ST vs. TT really just boils down to budget, time, and HP goals.

$2.5-3k extra for TT and install, and $6k for a motor buildup exceed my budget constraints. If I could afford to build my motor, buy a more expensive turbo kit, and do all the other stuff that goes along with that. Plus I would have to buy another car since I wouldn't have a DD anymore, then the single or twin question would be moot. I would go TT of course. (However if I had that much money, I wouldn't be driving a Z! )

For now the HP goal is only what the stock motor will take, and in the future will not exceed 550whp. The car is my daily driver, so I need an easy install over one weekend and a safe kit. Also, I need to stay around $6k, not the $9k the TT and install costs.

In other words ST is perfect for me.



BTW, are you building the motor Gman2004? Whether you're running the Vortech or Greddy TT you're going to have ~ the same hp on a stock motor. What was the point?

Last edited by xxlbeerZ; May 6, 2005 at 07:29 PM.
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 08:04 PM
  #15  
Gman2004's Avatar
Gman2004
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,328
Likes: 0
From: Miami, FL
Default

Originally Posted by xxlbeerZ
BTW, are you building the motor Gman2004? Whether you're running the Vortech or Greddy TT you're going to have ~ the same hp on a stock motor. What was the point?

Even if you net the same hp with a s/c as a tt you will have more power through out the band with the tt and more tq.

And yes I am building my motor. It is currently at SGP becoming an Ultimate Short Block 500-530rwhp for me in the very near future!
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 08:44 PM
  #16  
webcarconnection's Avatar
webcarconnection
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by Bran_BranZ33
Sorry to steal this thread but
-webcarconnection how many miles do you have on your turbos and have you had any
problems since install(like with stock internals and all)

Around 4000 NO problems at all
Reply
Old May 6, 2005 | 08:46 PM
  #17  
webcarconnection's Avatar
webcarconnection
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

Originally Posted by xxlbeerZ
ST vs. TT really just boils down to budget, time, and HP goals.

$2.5-3k extra for TT and install, and $6k for a motor buildup exceed my budget constraints. If I could afford to build my motor, buy a more expensive turbo kit, and do all the other stuff that goes along with that. Plus I would have to buy another car since I wouldn't have a DD anymore, then the single or twin question would be moot. I would go TT of course. (However if I had that much money, I wouldn't be driving a Z! )

For now the HP goal is only what the stock motor will take, and in the future will not exceed 550whp. The car is my daily driver, so I need an easy install over one weekend and a safe kit. Also, I need to stay around $6k, not the $9k the TT and install costs.

In other words ST is perfect for me.

The Single Turbo is a great choice also... both will make a big smile on your face
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 06:59 AM
  #18  
thillskier's Avatar
thillskier
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Default

The ST can also VERY EASILY be uprated by simply going to a bigger compressor section, or a complete new unit for 1/2 the cost of TT upgrade.
You MAY add a few hundred rpms to where boost kicks in, but it will pull longer and harder to redline...This is a much proven concept and is called a HYBRID turbo...many in use in Hondas and Toyota Mitsubishi cars...
The labor to change, and costs to do the same are MUCH less with the ST. Thats why I waited on the APS system, I wanted the choices this system gives me as well as the ultimate HP potential with their additional fueling in their Intake manifold setup.
There are PLENTY of 1000+ Toyotas etc using ST's.
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 07:58 AM
  #19  
MIAPLAYA's Avatar
MIAPLAYA
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
From: Escondido
Default

The lag comment still gets me...There is honestly not any lag in either of the single turbo set ups. Where are TT kits making full boost? Cause I know my Turbonetics kit makes full boost at 3200 RPMs. Yes a FULL 8 PSI. So lag can be dropped from the topic all together. AS for power and performance BOTH single turbos are making more with out of the box tune then some tt kits out of the box. Greddy out of the box is what 355-365? PE is what 360-370? Turbonetics is making 380+ and APS is making pretty close to the same. And quite frankly the curve is not THAT much different. I myself got the Single turbo for quite a few reasons, principally I like the design of my kit, the power delivery, and it is the best bang for the buck F/I kit available.
Reply
Old May 9, 2005 | 09:44 AM
  #20  
Alang's Avatar
Alang
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

One hugh drawback of the ST over the TT is that no ST kit is being CARB certed. For us poor slobs that live in CA and don't want to hassle with the risks of running an illegal system, CARB exempt is a must. CARB sucks, but those of us that plan on keeping our cars long term have to live with it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bcoffee20
Zs & Gs For Sale
5
Nov 19, 2015 06:39 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:16 AM.