Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Headers and a SC...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #21  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

^basically what my 8 paragraphs said
The only reason you make less power in lower RPMs w/ a free flowing exhaust is because of a poorly designed exhaust collector. A well designe dexhaust collector would mean power gains in the mid and lower RPMS range, and no difference in the upper range because angry drivers dont give a crap.\

Id like to add that another factor to concider is the pulse generated by the valves opening and closing. These travel much faster than the gas exelled by the wave, and the collector and length of the primary exhaust tube is what determines efficiency.

Last edited by plumpzz; Jul 25, 2006 at 12:08 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 05:03 PM
  #22  
blown in nc's Avatar
blown in nc
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
From: charlotte, nc
Default

Didn't mean to start a debate. I uderstand that headers make the engine more efficient and the boost readings decrease. You don't lose hp or tq----you gain, but the curve at which they come in is higher.

I just didn't understand Stillen saying that they were contraindicated with FI when roots/centrifigal V8s benefit from them.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2006 | 07:03 PM
  #23  
Z ELIMINATOR's Avatar
Z ELIMINATOR
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 245
Likes: 0
From: gta ont canada
Default

I have headers on my stillen and my bottom end power is awsume. When i added the random cats I lost 6 rwhp. Car makes 8.5lbs of boost with headers on a 9lb pulley. its a 5 AT. with 3.53 gears and there is no loss of power in first or 2nd gear. Goes like hell and very easy to hit the rev limiter when shifting in MM. Stillen says that i am losing 3/4 lb of boost and about 12 rwhp. will post dyno results with 9 lb pulley soon.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 04:41 AM
  #24  
jpc350z's Avatar
jpc350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: columbia md.
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
a simplified explanation is a highway and rush hour.

there's only so many cars on the road (amount of air)

a 2 lane highway will clog up easier than a 8 lane highway (how restrictive the exhaust is)

when rush hour happens (throttle) , the cars bunch up and get pissed off (condensed air)

when those pissed off cars finally get out of rush hour, they speed up beyond normal because they're pissed off (air wants to decompress and moves faster due to the barometric pressure difference to get outside to where the air is normal density again)

if you had a 8 lane highway, the cars would just pass right thru at their normal speed
With due respect your analogy's are mind boggling...
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 07:51 AM
  #25  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by jpc350z
With due respect your analogy's are mind boggling...
well then here's some physics forumla stuff that hopefully are more up your alley that you were originally requesting

velocity = airflow/area

Power = torque x rpm

Force = power/velocity

Power = original power x new pressure ratio x density ratio x volumetric efficencies ratio x drive power efficiency

airflow rate = (cid x rpm x .5 x E) / 1728

density ratio = original absolute temp / final absolute temp

pressure ratio = (14.7psi + boost) / 14.7 psi


bore area = (pi squared) / 4

bore diameter = square root of (4 x area)/pi

Last edited by sentry65; Jul 26, 2006 at 07:57 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:00 AM
  #26  
jpc350z's Avatar
jpc350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: columbia md.
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
well then here's some physics forumla stuff that hopefully are more up your alley that you were originally requesting

velocity = airflow/area

Power = torque x rpm

power = original power x new pressure ratio x density ratio x volumetric efficencies ratio x drive power efficiency

airflow rate = (cid x rpm x .5 x E) / 1728

density ratio = original absolute temp / final absolute temp

pressure ratio = (14.7psi + boost) / 14.7 psi
Great formulas but it doesn't answer the mail..And You don't say what E is ! PlumpZZ has nicely answered the question "more flow means more power" which was my basic query... Thanks
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:05 AM
  #27  
sentry65's Avatar
sentry65
the burninator
Premier Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 9,722
Likes: 2
From: phoenix, AZ
Default

E is the volumetric efficency of the engine

thought those formulas would help you get started for plugging numbers into things, but they give you single numbers so you'll have to plug in different numbers for different rpms and engine loads


there's some technical articles online that give examples how to use them

otherwise I've done all I can at this point to try to help
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2006 | 08:18 AM
  #28  
jpc350z's Avatar
jpc350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,041
Likes: 0
From: columbia md.
Default

Originally Posted by sentry65
E is the volumetric efficency of the engine

thought those formulas would help you get started for plugging numbers into things, but they give you single numbers so you'll have to plug in different numbers for different rpms and engine loads


there's some technical articles online that give examples how to use them

otherwise I've done all I can at this point to try to help
E is usually written as Ve.. Really appreciate the help..
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B Esquire
Autocross/Road
0
Sep 24, 2015 07:52 AM
z33z_nutz
Intake Exhaust
22
Sep 23, 2015 07:22 PM
NissanZcrazy
Forced Induction
4
Sep 23, 2015 07:59 AM
EnjukuRacing
Engine
0
Sep 9, 2015 06:42 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:17 AM.