Zeitronix VS. AEM
Alright first of all for you sticklers and complainers, I used the search button, did a little research, but still dont have a clear answer!
i have the turbonetics ST kit, gonna b controlled through a UTEC, just wondering which wideband I should get? The Zeitronix or the AEM. Heard good things about both, but have heard the AEM is more common, thus making it a little more compatible w/ the shops when we tune. Any recommendations?
i have the turbonetics ST kit, gonna b controlled through a UTEC, just wondering which wideband I should get? The Zeitronix or the AEM. Heard good things about both, but have heard the AEM is more common, thus making it a little more compatible w/ the shops when we tune. Any recommendations?
If you're only looking for an external wideband, and the only tuning that will be done would be on a dyno that integrates their AFR readings with their logs, then the Zeitronix should work just fine.
I've been running an AEM on Bank1 and TXS Tuner on bank2 for almost 2 years. The AEM and TXS are always very close. So I have to assume the AEM is accurate. Couldn't say how long it'll last though, but I haven't had any troube with mine. They both use Bosch O2 sensors.
Last edited by gothchick; Oct 15, 2008 at 10:16 AM.
I have had both and the Zeitronix was the better wideband and is a boost and EGT display all in one . But the box is not the greatest looking display and you have to keep it out of the sunlight to see it . I mounted mine on the top of the dash to be in the line of sight . I could never see it in the day light so I built a shroud for it . I didnt think it looked good mounted anywhere else . I believe gauges look MUCH better !




