Notices
Forced Induction Turbochargers and Superchargers..Got Boost?

Greddy or GTM TT kit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 07:59 AM
  #21  
Kuhan's Avatar
Kuhan
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by 2004Black350z
Why not SP?
Is SP stand for "Sound Performance" shop here in Chicago area?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 08:01 AM
  #22  
tiguy99's Avatar
tiguy99
New Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 609
Likes: 0
From: Chicago
Default

Yup!
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 08:30 AM
  #23  
John@z1's Avatar
John@z1
Sponsor
Z1 Motorsports
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
From: GA
Default

Ball Bearing FTW.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 08:39 AM
  #24  
Cass007's Avatar
Cass007
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 5,419
Likes: 2
From: In teh Mid-A
Default

Originally Posted by Kuhan
Is SP stand for "Sound Performance" shop here in Chicago area?
- If you want a monster, go see the guys at SP. Hook up with Tom or some of the other Chi-Town guys and go for a ride.... you won't ever look at your car the same way again
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 08:42 AM
  #25  
Kuhan's Avatar
Kuhan
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,208
Likes: 1
From: Chicago, IL
Default

Originally Posted by Cass007
you won't ever look at your car the same way again
That's what I'm afraid of.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 08:45 AM
  #26  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

I disagree with Tom, being an auto, and assuming you want to hit your goals on pump gas I would say you DO need cams at a minimum.

BC2's + 18G should be 550whp on a bad day on 93, even on the auto. Sell the GTM IMO.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 09:57 AM
  #27  
UMW350Z's Avatar
UMW350Z
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Piscataway, NJ
Default

Are the dBB turbos really that much better than the Mitsu/GReddy 18 or 20G? I like the water-cooled effect to prevent coking at shutdown and a bit better turbo heat disbursement, hence why I went with PL over TN, but it operating temps, is there really a big difference?
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 10:27 AM
  #28  
Z PHAT Z's Avatar
Z PHAT Z
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
From: Amherst NY
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
I disagree with Tom, being an auto, and assuming you want to hit your goals on pump gas I would say you DO need cams at a minimum.

BC2's + 18G should be 550whp on a bad day on 93, even on the auto. Sell the GTM IMO.
Bert,
My car with built long block with head works, cams ...etc...CJM stage 2 FRS, RC 750cc, Meth injection, APS 2.5 exhaust, Crawford plenum, only made 523.xx RWHP on Injected PErformance's dyno with about 17 psi then It started to get into fuel delivery problem.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 11:00 AM
  #29  
jmicaelk's Avatar
jmicaelk
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

Thanks all.
Alberto I agree with you that I probably get more for the GTM, and as long as both kits gives me about the same output then that is what I will do.
I will probably use meth injection and I guess 3" exhaust to be on the safe side. My fuel pump should be able to handle all the fuel I need and then some, and I have some SARD 800cc injectors. Not sure about the cams yet, don't want to put more in there than I can use with the AT. But if cams will give me a better power delivery and some other benefits then I think I will go for it.
Thanks again everyone for all the advise, and if you have some more please let me know
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 02:46 PM
  #30  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

Originally Posted by Z PHAT Z
Bert,
My car with built long block with head works, cams ...etc...CJM stage 2 FRS, RC 750cc, Meth injection, APS 2.5 exhaust, Crawford plenum, only made 523.xx RWHP on Injected PErformance's dyno with about 17 psi then It started to get into fuel delivery problem.
IIRC they have a DD.

Every car is different, every tuner is diff, but if they do run a DD, your 523 is easily over 550whp on a DJ. You run cams/heads but only a 2.5" exhaust, the setup isnt ideal IMO-IM NOT downing you just pointing out key differences compared to my setup with a big exhaust and only cams with no headwork.

My car is a 6 speed, but with BC cams it does 605whp @ 13psi straight pump. Some shops/owners push harder than others, Injected is well respected and they know their $hit, but my point is it doesnt mean it couldnt make more with another tuner or another dyno. All reasons why we shouldnt chase dyno #'s....

Last edited by Alberto; Jul 5, 2010 at 02:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 04:19 PM
  #31  
Z PHAT Z's Avatar
Z PHAT Z
New Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,068
Likes: 0
From: Amherst NY
Default

Originally Posted by Alberto
IIRC they have a DD.

Every car is different, every tuner is diff, but if they do run a DD, your 523 is easily over 550whp on a DJ. You run cams/heads but only a 2.5" exhaust, the setup isnt ideal IMO-IM NOT downing you just pointing out key differences compared to my setup with a big exhaust and only cams with no headwork.

My car is a 6 speed, but with BC cams it does 605whp @ 13psi straight pump. Some shops/owners push harder than others, Injected is well respected and they know their $hit, but my point is it doesnt mean it couldnt make more with another tuner or another dyno. All reasons why we shouldnt chase dyno #'s....
Understand what you're saying Bert. My previous tune on a different dyno netted me 645 WHP and 670 WTQ LOL! I know the exhaust and injectors were preventing from getting more power. I always followed ur build up post and learned from there.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 04:57 PM
  #32  
jmicaelk's Avatar
jmicaelk
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 415
Likes: 0
From: Bangkok, Thailand
Default

Originally Posted by Z PHAT Z
Understand what you're saying Bert. My previous tune on a different dyno netted me 645 WHP and 670 WTQ LOL! I know the exhaust and injectors were preventing from getting more power. I always followed ur build up post and learned from there.
Yeah I have heard the same, follow Alberto's build and you will make good reliable hp over 600rwhp. I just hope the AT can hold up, they say between 550-600rwhp
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2010 | 07:31 PM
  #33  
GBoger's Avatar
GBoger
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 730
Likes: 1
From: Charlotte
Default

i would go with the 18g's if i were going with greddy simply for the powerband and they will have plenty of flow to achieve your desired numbers. 20g's just seem to be a bit laggy on the vq35
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 04:31 PM
  #34  
nathanwl2004's Avatar
nathanwl2004
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 738
Likes: 0
From: charlotte ,nc
Default

how big of a difference is there in the spool characteristics of the GTM kit?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 05:11 PM
  #35  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

they would be within a 100 rpms is not closer
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 05:58 PM
  #36  
nomyth46's Avatar
nomyth46
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 295
Likes: 0
From: NC
Default

how much more lag does the 20g's have then the 18gs. my 18g's reach full boost at 3800rpms. what about the 20g's?
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2010 | 07:13 PM
  #37  
str8dum1's Avatar
str8dum1
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 8,807
Likes: 7
From: raleigh-wood NC
Default

of all the dynos I have seen and compared with in my spreadsheet, it really depends on the tune and the build. no one has done side by side on the same build, but all else equal, less than 400 rpms.

no one has shown that the 20gs make that much more top end over a properly setup 18g to warrant the extra lag though.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 08:24 AM
  #38  
midz350's Avatar
midz350
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,054
Likes: 24
From: around.
Default

Originally Posted by str8dum1
of all the dynos I have seen and compared with in my spreadsheet, it really depends on the tune and the build. no one has done side by side on the same build, but all else equal, less than 400 rpms.

no one has shown that the 20gs make that much more top end over a properly setup 18g to warrant the extra lag though.

Actually Greddy did 750whp on their 4.2 HR Z with the new 20Gs kit. I haven't seen anyone did +700whp (just boost) with the 18Gs!!
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 08:48 AM
  #39  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

750whp "should" be attainable on a 3.5 w/20G's and proper setup, IMO thats weaksauce for a 4.2L

I have seen a 3.5L do over 700whp (DJ) with 18G's.

Last edited by Alberto; Jul 8, 2010 at 08:49 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 8, 2010 | 01:37 PM
  #40  
nightcrawler_8's Avatar
nightcrawler_8
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 800
Likes: 0
From: UAE
Default

both kits are good. but i would go with GTM.

1) oil/watercooled
2) GTM is in the US. and lets assume a part was missing. comon. it will take a day or two to be shipped. and SAM is a great person to deal with. ( i got my kit from SAM and i am in the other part of the word and all the parts were there. not a single bolt missing ) .. i guess it happened couple of time before not now.
3) with the GTM kit you can upgrade up to stage 6 ( 900+ hp ) .. so the growth path is better with GTM.



GTM FTW .
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:14 AM.