Forced Induction comparsion
Originally posted by mcduck
Hmmm... than my car must be a Superfreak! My best dyno hit 424.9rwhp end 340ftlbs of torque with the Vortech.
Hmmm... than my car must be a Superfreak! My best dyno hit 424.9rwhp end 340ftlbs of torque with the Vortech.
By the way Esemes... great numbers in that kind of heat, congrats!
Registered User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Originally posted by little_rod
Great numbers esemes, with a better torque curve than I come to expect from the Vortech.
Great numbers esemes, with a better torque curve than I come to expect from the Vortech.
That's no torque curve- it's a torque TABLETOP!
Very nice and flat- good job Scott!
Thread Starter
Registered User
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
From: Silverdale, WA
Originally posted by InfinitiTech
That's no torque curve- it's a torque TABLETOP!
Very nice and flat- good job Scott!
That's no torque curve- it's a torque TABLETOP!
Very nice and flat- good job Scott!
I was thinking the same thing. But It's because they started sampling at almost 4000 rpm. I'd like to see how much the mods helped his low end TQ.
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 660
Likes: 0
From: clearh2o, FL
guys--
i dont know the reason for the flatline TQ, but im not complaining....
i wonder if my tuner has the info (below 3700) or not......
i do remember seeing that the sample start speed was like 46mph or something.....
maybe its due to the load control of the mustang dyno??
either way, much thanks for the praise....
eS
i dont know the reason for the flatline TQ, but im not complaining....
i wonder if my tuner has the info (below 3700) or not......
i do remember seeing that the sample start speed was like 46mph or something.....
maybe its due to the load control of the mustang dyno??
either way, much thanks for the praise....
eS