Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

Motordyne's MREV Lower Plenum INSTALLED on 287 with Crawford v5

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 7, 2006 | 03:57 PM
  #1  
wren57's Avatar
wren57
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
From: I'm A Gypsy
Default Motordyne's MREV Lower Plenum INSTALLED on 287 with Crawford v5

Well I decided to celebrate my birthday by finally getting around to putting my MREV lower manifold on. I've probably swapped out upper plenums 6-10 times by now so it was a breeze... only took two hours with many, many extended breaks. Here are the specs:

2003 Model, 41,000 miles
Popcharger
U/R Crank Pulley
Crawford V5 Upper Plenum
Kinetix Hiflo Cats
JIC Y-pipe
Fujitsubo 3" Stainless Exhaust

I'm going to eat some pizza and watch TV while the gasket maker dries (I threw out the old gasket) but will report back in 30 minutes or so with butt dyno impressions. I hope I have good news.
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 04:06 PM
  #2  
Alberto's Avatar
Alberto
Cranky FI Owner
Premier Member
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 34,715
Likes: 8
From: DMV
Default

So same plenum as yours just machined some in the front 2 runners. IMO not worth the time or $$$ to do it at all.
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 04:08 PM
  #3  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Sorry to go off topic, do you have the inlet and outlet diameters of the JIC, and the where you got it / how much you paid... could you please PM me?

Thanks!
Mike
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 04:48 PM
  #4  
wren57's Avatar
wren57
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
From: I'm A Gypsy
Default

Butt dyno reports very minor loss in torque below 3krpm and moderate gains from 3krpm up... really jumps from ~6200-6600rpm now. I've attached a butt-dyno chart.

Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 04:54 PM
  #5  
andy2434's Avatar
andy2434
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 152
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

LOL . . . data looks good. Enjoy!
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 05:04 PM
  #6  
StarcraftBW's Avatar
StarcraftBW
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Default

Congrat Wren............look like you GAIN big time HP&Tq with that MREV+ lower collect ....
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 05:14 PM
  #7  
amG35's Avatar
amG35
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by wren57
Butt dyno reports very minor loss in torque below 3krpm and moderate gains from 3krpm up... really jumps from ~6200-6600rpm now. I've attached a butt-dyno chart.


A loss of torque doesn't sound too good, are the gains up top worth it? Thanks.
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 05:14 PM
  #8  
Armitage's Avatar
Armitage
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 3
From: North Jersey
Default

I hope you didn't use an A/F sniffer with that butt-dyno.
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 05:17 PM
  #9  
StarcraftBW's Avatar
StarcraftBW
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Default

Originally Posted by amG35
A loss of torque doesn't sound too good, are the gains up top worth it? Thanks.
??? I don't see any losing Tq
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 05:19 PM
  #10  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by wren57
Butt dyno reports very minor loss in torque below 3krpm and moderate gains from 3krpm up... really jumps from ~6200-6600rpm now. I've attached a butt-dyno chart.

I cant argue with the facts. I’ll have to get one and add 3 spacers. Will I need a new hood?
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 05:42 PM
  #11  
amG35's Avatar
amG35
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: Florida
Default

Originally Posted by StarcraftBW
??? I don't see any losing Tq

wren57 stated that he felt a loss of torque below 3K.
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 05:47 PM
  #12  
wren57's Avatar
wren57
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
From: I'm A Gypsy
Default

Yes there is some loss of torque, not too significant at all... and the gains up top ARE worth it. It certainly isn't the BEST N/A mod I've done but it is one of the last ones I can do before getting into the drivetrain...
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 06:01 PM
  #13  
Acree's Avatar
Acree
Registered User
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,342
Likes: 1
From: DFW
Default

Any clue what the improvement in actual HP with the crawford v5 vs stock?

-Acree
Reply
Old May 7, 2006 | 06:08 PM
  #14  
wren57's Avatar
wren57
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
From: I'm A Gypsy
Default

I have never dyno'd but I can say I felt a noticeable increase in power with the Crawford plenum.
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 06:45 AM
  #15  
Hydrazine's Avatar
Hydrazine
MOTORDYNE-MY350Z SPONSOR
iTrader: (53)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,399
Likes: 9
From: L.A. California
Default

Originally Posted by Armitage
I hope you didn't use an A/F sniffer with that butt-dyno.
Hahahaha!
Ohhh man thats too explicit!
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 07:42 AM
  #16  
StarcraftBW's Avatar
StarcraftBW
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Default

this is the question i have been asking for awhile ......now i got the answer wohoooooo ....
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 09:16 AM
  #17  
MustGoFastR's Avatar
MustGoFastR
Registered User
iTrader: (13)
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 4,797
Likes: 1
From: San Diego
Default

Some real dynos would be nice. Isn't someone slated to do this soon?
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 09:16 AM
  #18  
99atlantic's Avatar
99atlantic
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 555
Likes: 0
From: calgary
Default

are you sure those gains uptop arn't from your wallet-dyno, lmao
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 10:22 AM
  #19  
OCG35Coupe's Avatar
OCG35Coupe
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 362
Likes: 0
From: Orange County CA
Default

It could be that the loss in torque down low makes the power up high more noticiable now..

And you never said if it was the MREV+ or MREV++? All you said is "MREV" which is the exact same lower collector as your stock lower collector.
Reply
Old May 8, 2006 | 10:28 AM
  #20  
wren57's Avatar
wren57
Thread Starter
Banned
iTrader: (34)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,663
Likes: 0
From: I'm A Gypsy
Default

I don't know what the hell the difference between the MREV+ and MREV++ and MREV2 is... and to be honest I think it is a poor marketing decision by Motordyne to make it so ambiguous.

What I have is a stock lower collector that has had the front two runners shaven down a little bit. In addition to this I sanded/polished the rest of it and took out as much volume from the runners themselves as my 60grit sandpaper + elbow grease could...
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:06 PM.