Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

resonated TP vs HFC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 10:59 AM
  #1  
audster56's Avatar
audster56
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
From: florida
Default resonated TP vs HFC

i am leaning towards using resonated test pipes but am concerned that the sensors are not going to recognize the drop in CO and reconfigure the engine parameters with what i would assume to be a richer fuel mixture and a change in timing resulting in a drop in performance. i noticed that there are many members running exhausts with TP. How are you adressing this so the engine runs correctly? i apologize in advance if this question has been adressed before but i am having difficulty in searching for the answer. I am looking at purchasing the fast intentions intimidator cat back exhaust and plan on keeping the car NA.

Last edited by audster56; Jun 8, 2006 at 11:05 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #2  
lex350's Avatar
lex350
Registered User
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 661
Likes: 0
From: Orange County, CA
Default

I’ve heard of something you could buy to fix this problem. I think it’s called a turbonator. I can get you one but I need $500 from you first.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 05:50 PM
  #3  
Cannysage's Avatar
Cannysage
New Member
iTrader: (29)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,374
Likes: 1
From: SO_CAL
Default

Originally Posted by audster56
i am leaning towards using resonated test pipes but am concerned that the sensors are not going to recognize the drop in CO and reconfigure the engine parameters with what i would assume to be a richer fuel mixture and a change in timing resulting in a drop in performance. i noticed that there are many members running exhausts with TP. How are you adressing this so the engine runs correctly? i apologize in advance if this question has been adressed before but i am having difficulty in searching for the answer. I am looking at purchasing the fast intentions intimidator cat back exhaust and plan on keeping the car NA.
Dude, are you 'DATA' from Star Trek? I think I've heard this thread in one of the episodes, 'Return of Spok' or something, rather
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 06:41 PM
  #4  
03_Track_Z's Avatar
03_Track_Z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Texas
Default

it seems like most people eat the insane cost and fix it with either

1) reflash
2) EU
3) UTEC

All three options I despise, the first because its mail in and that never comes out perfectly, the second because its expensive, and the third because its ***** expensive
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 06:49 PM
  #5  
plumpzz's Avatar
plumpzz
New Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
From: Jersey, New
Default

The rear 02 sensors are for the smog system. It has nothing to do with engine parameters ect. The ones in the headers are for that.
Reply
Old Jun 8, 2006 | 09:15 PM
  #6  
TheCajunStyle's Avatar
TheCajunStyle
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 532
Likes: 0
From: Berkshires
Default

Originally Posted by plumpzz
The rear 02 sensors are for the smog system. It has nothing to do with engine parameters ect. The ones in the headers are for that.
To elaborate a little more...

The requirement of the O2 sensors is:

Temp(front) > Temp(rear)

Therefore, all four O2 sensors are for the smog system. The Help! nonfouler workaround simulates this requirement by pulling the rear sensors away from the exhaust flow, thereby reading a slightly lower temperature than the front sensors--the ECU is happy
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sales@czp
Engine
33
Sep 23, 2019 03:30 PM
nanotech
Exhaust
6
Oct 2, 2015 05:02 AM
Red G Coupe
Videos
0
Sep 8, 2015 08:36 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:25 AM.