Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

Truth about CAI (Cold Air Intake)?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 10:02 AM
  #1  
Hupperware's Avatar
Hupperware
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 192
Likes: 0
From: Tempe, AZ
Question Truth about CAI (Cold Air Intake)?

I've heard bad things about CAIs. The worst probably is the fact that they increase the air flow over the Mass Air Sensor which tells the computer to lean out the car. A leaner car seems to run stronger (butt dyno), but is bad for the engine.

Is this true?
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 10:08 AM
  #2  
mofoz's Avatar
mofoz
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 1
From: Prospect Heights, IL
Default

a CAI will not cause your car to run lean. You need many more mods to cause anything of concern. After a few mods many people suggest to get the Technosquare ECU flash, which also raises the redline.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 10:55 AM
  #3  
FLY BY Z's Avatar
FLY BY Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,700
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

increased airflow will not tell the car to run leaner. it will make the car run leaner. more air without more fuel is leaner and leaner. it will cause the car to run lean and therefore tell the car to run richer.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 11:45 AM
  #4  
dr_gallup's Avatar
dr_gallup
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
From: South Carolina
Default Re: Truth about CAI (Cold Air Intake)?

Originally posted by Hupperware
I've heard bad things about CAIs. The worst probably is the fact that they increase the air flow over the Mass Air Sensor which tells the computer to lean out the car. A leaner car seems to run stronger (butt dyno), but is bad for the engine.

Is this true?
Mass Air Flow Sensors measures the (very minimal) increased air flow, computer adds fuel to compensate, Air Fuel ratio unchanged. Power increase (very minimal) due to increased energy released by greater quantity of air & fuel burning in the cylinders.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2004 | 12:53 PM
  #5  
Sins4u33's Avatar
Sins4u33
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
From: Annandale, VA
Default

meaning you get better gas mileage too!

Gruppe M intake soon to come!

Ben
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 03:58 PM
  #6  
alex30327's Avatar
alex30327
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

I did a comparison of the Nismo Intake, stock intake, injen and JWT intakes with a "car chip" that records ait intake temp, air flow, etc. and found that the intake that allows the most air flow is the JWT popcharger, then the stock set up, then Injen & Nismo.

As far as air temps I only have numbers comparing the Nismo and stock set up. The difference was only 2-3 degress colder air for the Nismo set up (avg. over an 12 mile run), but with less volume of air.

I don't know how accurate the "Car Chip" is, so these numbers could mean nothig at all, so take it as it is. I personally feel that this little experiment has some basis to it since the data was recorded off of the ECU itself, but who knows?

And yes, I do have all these intakes.

Craford Plenum air flow rate blew away all of the above.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 04:02 PM
  #7  
alex30327's Avatar
alex30327
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

pic of graph with Crawford Plenum and JWT pop charger air flow rate.
Attached Thumbnails Truth about CAI (Cold Air Intake)?-crawford.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 04:04 PM
  #8  
alex30327's Avatar
alex30327
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Stock intake graph
Attached Thumbnails Truth about CAI (Cold Air Intake)?-stock-intaketwoo.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 04:11 PM
  #9  
alex30327's Avatar
alex30327
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 575
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

speed, on closed track of course
Attached Thumbnails Truth about CAI (Cold Air Intake)?-sadc.jpg  
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 04:50 PM
  #10  
kzshin's Avatar
kzshin
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 954
Likes: 0
From: OC, CA.
Default

CAI doesn't work well on 350Z. So far JWT works the best, and if you really look into the design of JWT and carfully evalute the intake inlet behind 350Z's bumper it;'s not hard to undersand why.

For CAI, somthing works good on HONDA doesn't really mean it;s going to work good on Nissan or others.
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 07:06 PM
  #11  
sschmuve's Avatar
sschmuve
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 644
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix AZ
Default

It seems like CAIs will show more gain on a dyno, with relativly static air, than the stock/pop charger. But the tides turn when there is actual ram air applied. It's cool to see how these mods perform during real driving conditions. Thanks for the info!
Reply
Old Jan 6, 2004 | 07:11 PM
  #12  
350zdanny's Avatar
350zdanny
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,023
Likes: 0
From: Central Jersey
Default

I thought the injen had the best numbers? I've had a few different setups and I like the Injen the best. CAI's were never meant to make huge gains anyway.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 12:39 PM
  #13  
Hey Ya's Avatar
Hey Ya
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 484
Likes: 0
From: DFW
Default

I'm doing this for my Nismo when Roark (or I) get the time:

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread....103#post553103
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 01:49 PM
  #14  
FairladyZ's Avatar
FairladyZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
From: Allen, TX
Default

Anytime you "ram air" its better. Of course stock and JWT is going to show better on the dyno (designed to work with very little air). A guy did a comparison at the track (where real results are made) and it showed significant gains.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 02:03 PM
  #15  
2003z's Avatar
2003z
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Originally posted by FairladyZ
Anytime you "ram air" its better. Of course stock and JWT is going to show better on the dyno (designed to work with very little air). A guy did a comparison at the track (where real results are made) and it showed significant gains.
Alex's data above isn't from a dyno, its from autotap, which reads your ecu while driving. I think his comparison is the best we can get, and appreciate the info.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 02:40 PM
  #16  
dougrace zs's Avatar
dougrace zs
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Cool

Last edited by dougrace zs; Jan 7, 2004 at 02:59 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 04:05 PM
  #17  
MyZ4U2C's Avatar
MyZ4U2C
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 838
Likes: 6
From: Raleigh, NC
Default

Popcharger is the best aftermarket intake it seems.......
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 04:26 PM
  #18  
FairladyZ's Avatar
FairladyZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,407
Likes: 0
From: Allen, TX
Default

If the popcharger is so good, why wouldnt you just goto to autozone and buy a 10 dollar cone filter?
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 05:47 PM
  #19  
FLY BY Z's Avatar
FLY BY Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,700
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

because the popcharger is more than just a cone filter. you also get a heat shield and something to mount the MAF to which, in some certain cases, can be considered a necessity. the popcharger is also open filters in the nose of itself to take some advantage of the air path through the front of the Z which a typical cone filter will not do. you get all of this for maybe at most 50 dollars more than a cone filter all by itself. worth it? yes.
Reply
Old Jan 7, 2004 | 05:54 PM
  #20  
VandyZ's Avatar
VandyZ
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

Originally posted by FairladyZ
If the popcharger is so good, why wouldnt you just goto to autozone and buy a 10 dollar cone filter?
Because it allows air to enter from front and sides (most cone filters have flat non-filtered front) and it has a velocity stack and venturi built into the adaptor plate.

All this for $100. Not bad. It is a good mod as long as it gets the same air as the stock air box. I am in the process of doing similar tests with autotap. The only number I am concerned with is the air charge at speed and WOT. We know the cone flows as good if not better in stagnant air and on the dyno!

On a side note the JWT with an aluminum intake tube (like injen) sounds very very mean at WOT.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:58 AM.