Notices
Intake Exhaust Moving all that air in and out efficiently

Best exhaust for going all NA?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 08:23 AM
  #21  
Diesel350's Avatar
Diesel350
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,378
Likes: 1
From: Tampa
Default

Originally posted by bwzabodyn
the thing with an N/A setup is that if you go with a too free-flowing exhaust (ie large diameter single outlet) - you might gain the most power up top, but you're also going to lose the most torque down low - a race car spends most of its time in the upper-range of the RPM band (that's why peak HP gain is most relevant to them) whereas street cars spend most of their time in the lower-to-mid range of the RPM band - some restriction/backpressure needs to be there on an N/A car in order to keep from losing the low-end torque these cars are known for - unless you're going to be tracking your vehicle constantly, I would first suggest a true-dual setup (Stillen, GReddy, Injen) then either a good y-pipe (JIC) paired with a good y-pipe back exhaust...
That's not the case with the APS exhaust. It's 2.5 in diameter and most of the power it low to mid range. Maybe APS can chime in.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 09:42 AM
  #22  
Speedracer's Avatar
Speedracer
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,144
Likes: 1
From: West Springfield, MA
Default

Originally posted by bwzabodyn
the thing with an N/A setup is that if you go with a too free-flowing exhaust (ie large diameter single outlet) - you might gain the most power up top, but you're also going to lose the most torque down low - a race car spends most of its time in the upper-range of the RPM band (that's why peak HP gain is most relevant to them) whereas street cars spend most of their time in the lower-to-mid range of the RPM band - some restriction/backpressure needs to be there on an N/A car in order to keep from losing the low-end torque these cars are known for - unless you're going to be tracking your vehicle constantly, I would first suggest a true-dual setup (Stillen, GReddy, Injen) then either a good y-pipe (JIC) paired with a good y-pipe back exhaust...

Yes....but whether you have one larger pipe, or two smaller ones, with the same combined cross-sectional area, it doesn't make a difference. Don't fool yourself into thinking it does. At the lower rpms, the gas/pipe surface dynamic resistance will not be as much of a factor, and at high rpm, where it does matter, the single pipe performance will be better.

Last edited by Speedracer; Jun 16, 2004 at 10:26 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 10:16 AM
  #23  
RA11325's Avatar
RA11325
Banned
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,918
Likes: 0
Default

i wouldnt expect more than 10whp from an exhaust system, and thats on a really good day
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 10:51 AM
  #24  
GY-Z's Avatar
GY-Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
From: Canada B.C.
Default

Originally posted by PoWeRtRiP
dont ever trust a manufacturers dyno sheet. they often take the lowest dyno they ever get stock then compare it to the highest one with their mods. at most i could see you gaining 15whp with header back exhaust on an na.
i dont know, the # Amuse cliamed for the s2k Ti exhaust wasn't off too much from ppl went to dyno their car.
so i'll just assume what u said is not the case for Amuse.
+ ppl on the bored had dynoed the amuse Ti exhaust only for 11~12 whp.(could'nt remember exatctly).
with a y-pipe and test pipe, i belive it can bump up at least another 6~8 whp without the headers u mentioned.

Last edited by GY-Z; Jun 16, 2004 at 11:04 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 01:33 PM
  #25  
bwzabodyn's Avatar
bwzabodyn
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: El Campo, TX
Default

APS's exhaust is also a dual exhaust - and regardless of who says what about the numbers that their exhaust can put out (remember they're trying to sell this product) it has been PROVEN with numerous dyno's that no combination of test pipes/high-flow cats and cat-back exhaust on an N/A car can produce over 15 HP... period. But I promise you that I will be pretty close to that number after I bolt my Greddy EVO II up to my test pipes... but maybe I'm wrong - either way I really don't care b/c 1-2 HP more or less really doesn't matter as long as YOU are happy with what you have - and that's probably my #1 reason for choosing the GREddy - liked the exhaust's designed and loved the sound it makes w/ test pipes....
Reply
Old Jun 16, 2004 | 08:57 PM
  #26  
Z BOY's Avatar
Z BOY
Registered User
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,264
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

Would someone be willing to submit a diagram showing where "y-pipe",
"test pipes", "cats", and "y-pipe back exhaust" are located, or tell me where to go to see this type of diagram, please?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 04:48 AM
  #27  
PoWeRtRiP's Avatar
PoWeRtRiP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 1
From: jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally posted by GY-Z
i dont know, the # Amuse cliamed for the s2k Ti exhaust wasn't off too much from ppl went to dyno their car.
so i'll just assume what u said is not the case for Amuse.
+ ppl on the bored had dynoed the amuse Ti exhaust only for 11~12 whp.(could'nt remember exatctly).
with a y-pipe and test pipe, i belive it can bump up at least another 6~8 whp without the headers u mentioned.
headers back means test pipes, y pipe, exh. not including headers gains.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 10:54 AM
  #28  
GY-Z's Avatar
GY-Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,204
Likes: 0
From: Canada B.C.
Default

Originally posted by PoWeRtRiP
headers back means test pipes, y pipe, exh. not including headers gains.
o sorry for my missunderstanding.
then i belive ur # is somehow correct, i have double check the # amuse claimed. they claimed 22 whp with test pipe, ti ypipe and exhaust.
which i bevlive wont be too much off.mabye somewhere saround 18~20 whp seems reasonable with test pipe and y-pipe.
as i said, the claimed 12 whp for just the exhaust. and some member on my350 with onlt the ti exhaust had dynoed with 11~12 whp already.so another 6~8 whp from test pipe and ypipe sounds reasonable?
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 11:11 AM
  #29  
kzshin's Avatar
kzshin
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 954
Likes: 0
From: OC, CA.
Default

A Japanese magaizne called HyperREV, they did the test on Amuse's exhaust, down pipe, Y- pipe, and Amuse ECU. The results are near 40hp gained.

Most of the powers acutally coming from test pipe, exhaust and ECU. The Y-pipe only increased around 2 hp.

And since Amuse unit are light weight unit, so overall performance gain regarding from power/weight ratio is very impressive.

You guys should buy a copy of that Magazine to check it out.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 11:20 AM
  #30  
PoWeRtRiP's Avatar
PoWeRtRiP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 1
From: jacksonville, FL
Default

the j-spec cars have less power than ours due to a more restrictive exhaust (i believe around 7-10hp less) you really cant compare gains on the z's from anywhere else in the world to ours.

the australian z's get 15-20 hp from exhausts alone for the same reason.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 11:32 AM
  #31  
genieman17's Avatar
genieman17
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 157
Likes: 0
From: CT
Default

Originally posted by PoWeRtRiP
the j-spec cars have less power than ours due to a more restrictive exhaust (i believe around 7-10hp less) you really cant compare gains on the z's from anywhere else in the world to ours.

the australian z's get 15-20 hp from exhausts alone for the same reason.
I thought J-spec cars had way more HP because of less restrictive exhausts and higher compression due to the availability of higher octane gas...and the reason the japanese companies focused on Ti exhausts was because the HP levels have been maxxed out and that the only thing they could do to improve is to lighten them...where as other places focus on flow because of the restrictiveness....thats what i thought...but i could be totally wrong...sometimes i just make stuff up for no reason...
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 11:43 AM
  #32  
PoWeRtRiP's Avatar
PoWeRtRiP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 1
From: jacksonville, FL
Default

they have exact same engine but are able to tune them different due to the availability of better gas. i believe they have the equivalent of 95 oct. they have diff exhaust due to emissions. there is definitely room to improve the stock exhaust, its the y pipe and cats that choke it not the muffler section.
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 12:32 PM
  #33  
bwzabodyn's Avatar
bwzabodyn
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: El Campo, TX
Default

ok, here's the deal - we're talking about N/A cars, but if you bring up the word "downpipe" that automatically signals **TT** in my head - which would definitely justify the increases you see - just an observation...
Reply
Old Jun 17, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #34  
Resolute's Avatar
Resolute
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,097
Likes: 3
From: @7000 ft
Default

Originally posted by bwzabodyn
the thing with an N/A setup is that if you go with a too free-flowing exhaust (ie large diameter single outlet) - you might gain the most power up top, but you're also going to lose the most torque down low - some restriction/backpressure needs to be there on an N/A car in order to keep from losing the low-end torque these cars are known for
This really isn't true, in fact, probably the most misunderstood concept in automotive tech, right next to viscous limited slip diffs
There is no such thing as a "too free-flowing exhaust." And backpressure is NEVER necessary to make power or torque at any range, just the opposite in fact.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 06:15 AM
  #35  
Z BOY's Avatar
Z BOY
Registered User
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,264
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default clarification

Originally posted by PoWeRtRiP
they have exact same engine but are able to tune them different due to the availability of better gas. i believe they have the equivalent of 95 oct. they have diff exhaust due to emissions. there is definitely room to improve the stock exhaust, its the y pipe and cats that choke it not the muffler section.
So you're saying that on the stock exhaust system, the biggest flow restriction is found in the y-pipe and the cats, and that the stock muffler is no more restrictive than aftermarket mufflers? What evidence do you have to support this statement?
How do you like your Injen exhaust? Is it the one with the exhaust tips exiting the undercarriage at an angle? I really like that style. Just wish they had it in titanium.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 06:46 AM
  #36  
Z BOY's Avatar
Z BOY
Registered User
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,264
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

What do you guys think of the Injen dyno test done at this website: http://www.hopupracing.com/insesex3512w1.html ???
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 06:52 AM
  #37  
Z BOY's Avatar
Z BOY
Registered User
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 5,264
Likes: 1
From: CA
Default

Originally posted by kzshin
A Japanese magaizne called HyperREV, they did the test on Amuse's exhaust, down pipe, Y- pipe, and Amuse ECU. The results are near 40hp gained.

Most of the powers acutally coming from test pipe, exhaust and ECU. The Y-pipe only increased around 2 hp.

And since Amuse unit are light weight unit, so overall performance gain regarding from power/weight ratio is very impressive.

You guys should buy a copy of that Magazine to check it out.
Does the mag have a website where i can find this article, and if so, is it in English?
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 07:05 AM
  #38  
PoWeRtRiP's Avatar
PoWeRtRiP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 1
From: jacksonville, FL
Default

Originally posted by mrgwski
What do you guys think of the Injen dyno test done at this website: http://www.hopupracing.com/insesex3512w1.html ???
dont believe it independent tests have shown that gains are in the 8-9whp range
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 07:09 AM
  #39  
PoWeRtRiP's Avatar
PoWeRtRiP
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,906
Likes: 1
From: jacksonville, FL
Default Re: clarification

Originally posted by mrgwski
So you're saying that on the stock exhaust system, the biggest flow restriction is found in the y-pipe and the cats, and that the stock muffler is no more restrictive than aftermarket mufflers? What evidence do you have to support this statement?
How do you like your Injen exhaust? Is it the one with the exhaust tips exiting the undercarriage at an angle? I really like that style. Just wish they had it in titanium.

yes thats why ppl gain 5-9whp from test pipes. and another 5whp from a ypipe on stock. the only ypipe back exh i can think of with proven gains is the nismo (3.16" pipe) which will only give gains of 5-6 whp.or the true dual exhausts only gain 8-9whp bc they have a ypipe replacement. do the math and youll notice that the muffler section difference is not significant compared to the other components.

its the angled tips, very loud. its also much lighter than stock i believe its the lightest true dual non-ti exhaust. dont quote me on this but i think it weighs like 45lbs? whats a true dual ti weigh 25lbs? is 20 lbs worth $1000 to you?

Last edited by PoWeRtRiP; Jun 18, 2004 at 07:13 AM.
Reply
Old Jun 18, 2004 | 07:09 AM
  #40  
zuff's Avatar
zuff
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

If you check the Australian regional forums in my350z you'll find the sticky we've posted for local dynos.

You'll find we gain between 15-20 rwkw with a full exhaust swap. Since we have pretty much the same car as Japan i'd say those figures can be reproduced anywhere except in the US. You guys already are 10-15hp over us.

The dyno thread is informative anyway.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:13 AM.