350Z Rolls Royce edition.... WTF?!

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

May 15, 2007 | 10:28 PM

#61

Casanova

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2005

Posts: 6,225

Likes: 0

From: Sydney

That Looks Fcking SIK... I want one !

May 15, 2007 | 11:06 PM

#62

Wendy

L A d y z 3 3

iTrader: (26)

Joined: Jan 2006

Posts: 1,550

Likes: 0

From: 562- So CAli

lol..

May 19, 2007 | 01:38 PM

#63

UHATEIT

Registered User

iTrader: (7)

Joined: Apr 2007

Posts: 1,334

Likes: 0

From: Northridge/Canoga Park, SOCAL

Thats pretty f****n crazy lookin! Interesting IMO I don't know why everyone hates it, I really like it!

This is my straight up oppinion:
Imagine that.. the 350Z to this car would be like what the Chrysler 300 is for the Rolls Royce Phantom

Last edited by UHATEIT; May 19, 2007 at 02:06 PM.

May 19, 2007 | 01:56 PM

#64

moforeynolds

Registered User

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Dec 2003

Posts: 3,271

Likes: 1

From: St Louis

absolutely unreal...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Vorais

I swear people post without reading. I will enlarge some of the points so hopefully people see them.

1. Car is Real, Not a photoshop
2. Car is not a 350Z nor does it have Nissan parts, it is a modified Rolls Royce.
3. A company DC Design makes these as well as other one offs.
4. Again, car is real.

Here is a link to dcdesigns website.
http://www.dcdesign.co.in/

Once again, for the visually impaired and flat-out retards.

May 19, 2007 | 03:05 PM

#65

98MODMTR

Guest

Posts: n/a

Probably saggin real

May 19, 2007 | 09:09 PM

#66

Armitage

350Z-holic

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Dec 2004

Posts: 5,163

Likes: 3

From: North Jersey

Its freaking cool as hell, but at the same time its retarded as hell.

May 24, 2007 | 07:08 PM

#67

Amiricanmade

Registered User

iTrader: (6)

Joined: Jul 2005

Posts: 1,711

Likes: 0

From: Southern Cal

I would drive that. Hopefully it has somethign better on the inside than the Z!

May 24, 2007 | 07:27 PM

#68

noodleman

Registered User

iTrader: (13)

Joined: May 2004

Posts: 6,002

Likes: 0

From: Ontario, Canada

Quote:

Originally Posted by moforeynolds

absolutely unreal...

Once again, for the visually impaired and flat-out retards.

lol. needs more cowbell.

May 24, 2007 | 11:00 PM

#69

jinsei888

New Member

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 4,262

Likes: 2

From: South San Francisco, CA

Quote:

Originally Posted by drsifu

if that's real, i admire the workmanship and time spent coming up with the idea and creating it.

can you imagine how many hours it tooks to fabricate all those one off pieces?

on another note, the part fitments are pathetic, check out how the rear tail lights meet the fenders and trunklid, the attention to detail is far from adequate

May 24, 2007 | 11:14 PM

#70

gregtotheb

Registered User

iTrader: (49)

Joined: Feb 2007

Posts: 1,758

Likes: 0

From: Pasadena, CA

nasty.

Jul 17, 2008 | 01:18 PM

#71

east1999bt

Registered User

Joined: Oct 2004

Posts: 1,055

Likes: 0

From: NJ

nice done ride, def very nice. i'd rock it

Jul 17, 2008 | 01:54 PM

#72

saberphx

Registered User

iTrader: (5)

Joined: May 2005

Posts: 4,190

Likes: 0

From: america

Quote:

Originally Posted by east1999bt

nice done ride, def very nice. i'd rock it

Good job bumping an old-as-**** thread and ugly-as-hell car.

Makes me puke.

Jul 17, 2008 | 07:40 PM

#73

GT47R

Registered User

iTrader: (14)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 2,974

Likes: 0

From: Miami

Oh God!!
Horrible!! If the company focuses on one offs, shouldn't they design it from scratch and not base it around another existing model, IMO!
Oh Well...