Notices
Motorsports The Z in its Natural Habitat

158 mph in a 350Z

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2003, 10:16 PM
  #21  
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
BriGuyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by Rob Nance
You know how it is as well as anyone BriGuyMax, owning a bike! Bike manufacturers and mags always claim rediculously low weights for new bikes, 300-400 lbs and crap, but in reality they are 400-500+
It's so true....
BriGuyMax is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 04:43 AM
  #22  
webcarconnection
Registered User
 
webcarconnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by BriGuyMax
People on this board love to talk about the base Z's curb weight of 3186lbs...they don't say anything about "street weight" so why should we talk about "street weight" when talking about other cars but curb weight when talking about 350Zs? sounds like a double standard to me.

I weight my car in the speedway, 3,186lbs are "street weigth"... of corse w/o me in it (200lbs more).
webcarconnection is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 07:21 AM
  #23  
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
BriGuyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by webcarconnection
I weight my car in the speedway, 3,186lbs are "street weigth"... of corse w/o me in it (200lbs more).
interestingly enough that's also the listed curb weight EXACTLY.

Was this with a full tank of gas, and the spare and jack in place? (I doubt it was since you were at the track) If not then the your 3186lbs is hardly a street weight.
BriGuyMax is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 08:33 AM
  #24  
webcarconnection
Registered User
 
webcarconnection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by BriGuyMax
interestingly enough that's also the listed curb weight EXACTLY.

Was this with a full tank of gas, and the spare and jack in place? (I doubt it was since you were at the track) If not then the your 3186lbs is hardly a street weight.
yes w spare and jack in place and almoust no gas in the tank.
webcarconnection is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 09:05 AM
  #25  
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
BriGuyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by webcarconnection
yes w spare and jack in place and almoust no gas in the tank.
Ah...there it is...nearly no gas. Do you drive around on the street everyday with a near empty tank? If so then I guess 3186lbs is your "street weight"...but a full tank of gas in a 350z weighs about 120lbs....so most of our "street weights are at least 100lbs over curb weight.
BriGuyMax is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 09:08 AM
  #26  
integrate
Registered User
 
integrate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, Ca
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by BriGuyMax
Ah...there it is...nearly no gas. Do you drive around on the street everyday with a near empty tank? If so then I guess 3186lbs is your "street weight"...but a full tank of gas in a 350z weighs about 120lbs....so most of our "street weights are at least 100lbs over curb weight.
****...I drive around everyday with almost no gas. Gas ain't cheap!!
integrate is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 09:17 AM
  #27  
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
BriGuyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by integrate
****...I drive around everyday with almost no gas. Gas ain't cheap!!
BriGuyMax is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 09:18 AM
  #28  
integrate
Registered User
 
integrate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Irvine, Ca
Posts: 333
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by BriGuyMax
Yea yea yea...sad part is I'm not even joking..

I'm going to start taking the bus .
integrate is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 09:33 AM
  #29  
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
BriGuyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by integrate
Yea yea yea...sad part is I'm not even joking..

I'm going to start taking the bus .
that's why I love my bike....50-60mpg...
BriGuyMax is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 09:49 AM
  #30  
cjbaldw
Registered User
 
cjbaldw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bear, DE
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

C&D magazine racing stats:

350Z stats:

60mph 5.4sec
1/4 mile 14.1@101
0-130mph 26.6sec
0-140mph 34.4sec

540is stats:

60mph 5.4sec
1/4 mile 14.1@100
0-130mph 25.4sec
0-140mph 32.5sec

This was with a Touring model 350Z and a 540is 6-spd, tested on differing days of course. The auto in the 540is really saps the power over 75mph, resulting in a high 14's E.T. instead of 14 flat in the close ratio 6-spd of the sport 6-spd model. You ran an auto, a 6-spd would pull away from a stock Z equally driven, as the 130 and 140 mph times indicate, two seconds is a lot of distance at those speeds. The 540's are electronically limited to 155mph, although a Dinan chip can remove that limit.

I don't know what the weight differences are between Touring and other model Z's however, that could have made a difference as well.

Last edited by cjbaldw; 03-20-2003 at 09:51 AM.
cjbaldw is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 09:53 AM
  #31  
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
BriGuyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by cjbaldw
C&D magazine racing stats:

350Z stats:

60mph 5.4sec
1/4 mile 14.1@101
0-130mph 26.6sec
0-140mph 34.4sec

540is stats:

60mph 5.4sec
1/4 mile 14.1@100
0-130mph 25.4sec
0-140mph 32.5sec

This was with a Touring model 350Z and a 540is 6-spd, tested on differing days of course. The auto in the 540is really saps the power over 75mph, resulting in a high 14's E.T. instead of 14 flat in the close ratio 6-spd of the sport 6-spd model. You ran an auto, a 6-spd would pull away from a stock Z equally driven, as the 130 and 140 mph times indicate, two seconds is a lot of distance at those speeds. The 540's are electronically limited to 155mph, although a Dinan chip can remove that limit.

I don't know what the weight differences are between Touring and other model Z's however, that could have made a difference as well.
That's a VERY small difference in time to speed acceleration tests, especially for tests done on different days in different conditions. I'd say a 6-speed 540i and a 6-speed 350Z would be a drivers race from any speed.
BriGuyMax is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 10:00 AM
  #32  
max2000jp
Registered User
 
max2000jp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by BriGuyMax
That's a VERY small difference in time to speed acceleration tests, especially for tests done on different days in different conditions. I'd say a 6-speed 540i and a 6-speed 350Z would be a drivers race from any speed.
A 2 second gap @ 140 is a pretty big distance.
max2000jp is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 10:18 AM
  #33  
S8ER95Z
New Member
 
S8ER95Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Quad Cities
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by max2000jp
A 2 second gap @ 140 is a pretty big distance.
Exactly!!!
S8ER95Z is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 10:35 AM
  #34  
ZFlyer
Registered User
 
ZFlyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: DFW
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I raced a 2003 540i Auto and pulled it pretty hard off the line. He wasn't too far behind when I shut down, maybe a car length but it was still obvious that I was pulling him. I don't know if the manual is that much faster, because I've driven a 540i with that geartronic transmission, and it shifts faster than most autos. I think the auto runs close to a 14.4 to 14.6. I've never heard of a manual running under 14 seconds. I think the Z can take a manual in a drag, because those 540's are geared more towards the highway than off the line.

-Bryan
ZFlyer is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 11:17 AM
  #35  
cjbaldw
Registered User
 
cjbaldw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bear, DE
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by BriGuyMax
That's a VERY small difference in time to speed acceleration tests, especially for tests done on different days in different conditions. I'd say a 6-speed 540i and a 6-speed 350Z would be a drivers race from any speed.

When you are travelling at a rate of 205 feet per second, every second counts, do the math.

Just as an example, take the delta of each car's capability to accelerate from 130-140MPH. The Z's numbers work out to 7.8 seconds, the 540is to 7.1 seconds. So roughly a 0.5 second difference. Let's take the middle ground of 135mph, so each car is travelling roughly 198 feet per second. Half a second difference equates to roughly 100 feet to make up the 1/2 second to get to 140mph, that's quite a few carlengths if I'm doing the math right (not saying I am, just working this out right here).

Last edited by cjbaldw; 03-20-2003 at 11:24 AM.
cjbaldw is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 12:02 PM
  #36  
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
BriGuyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by cjbaldw
When you are travelling at a rate of 205 feet per second, every second counts, do the math.

Just as an example, take the delta of each car's capability to accelerate from 130-140MPH. The Z's numbers work out to 7.8 seconds, the 540is to 7.1 seconds. So roughly a 0.5 second difference. Let's take the middle ground of 135mph, so each car is travelling roughly 198 feet per second. Half a second difference equates to roughly 100 feet to make up the 1/2 second to get to 140mph, that's quite a few carlengths if I'm doing the math right (not saying I am, just working this out right here).
If these were performance number achieved on the same day in the same conditions than this would be true. The 540 could have had better conditions for the test than the 350Z....which makes these numbers near useless.

My old maxima could run 14.4 on a nice cool, dry day....but on hot, humid days it would be lucky to even break into the 14s...
BriGuyMax is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 12:25 PM
  #37  
cjbaldw
Registered User
 
cjbaldw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bear, DE
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by BriGuyMax
If these were performance number achieved on the same day in the same conditions than this would be true. The 540 could have had better conditions for the test than the 350Z....which makes these numbers near useless.

My old maxima could run 14.4 on a nice cool, dry day....but on hot, humid days it would be lucky to even break into the 14s...
That is why in my first post I prefaced it with "tested on differing days of course".

Last edited by cjbaldw; 03-20-2003 at 12:41 PM.
cjbaldw is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 12:53 PM
  #38  
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
BriGuyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by cjbaldw
That is why in my first post I prefaced it with "tested on differing days of course".
Yes, but others are obviously not taking that into consideration.

The point is that the two cars were tested in different conditions, in different YEARS, and probably also in different magazines.

This is the true definition of "mag racing"

Until we get people with 6-speed Zs to run some 6-speed 540i's we won't know what the real outcome will be, so lets stop speculating based on ONE SET of mag numbers.
BriGuyMax is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 02:09 PM
  #39  
max2000jp
Registered User
 
max2000jp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It really doesnt matter if you are mag racing or not, a 2 second difference is huge.
max2000jp is offline  
Old 03-20-2003, 02:54 PM
  #40  
BriGuyMax
Turbo Whore
iTrader: (4)
 
BriGuyMax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: West suburbs of Chi-town
Posts: 7,303
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by max2000jp
It really doesnt matter if you are mag racing or not, a 2 second difference is huge.
actually from 0-140mph a 2 second difference is not "huge" at all. Figure they were going the SAME speed at the 1/4mile with the 540i being 1 tenth or less ahead of the Z. Probably because of a more highly skilled driver launching the 540.

"Conditions" could allow a Z to be ahead of the 540i in the comparison buy 1-3 tenths and a couple of MPH simply based on what people have actually run in Zs. This fictional "internet race" could then have been swayed in the other direction with the Z ahead at 140mph. The fact is...a car could pull from another very slowly and easily be 2 seconds behind by 140mph....0-140 is a LONG race...

If we were talking about a quarter mile run a 2 second difference would be HUGE. but not in a 0-140mph run.
BriGuyMax is offline  


Quick Reply: 158 mph in a 350Z



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:18 PM.