why is Z less quick than NSX, M3 and even 911s
Between most of these cars, it's usually gearing and redlines that make the difference. If the gearing is shorter, your acceleration is helped big time while the top speed is lowered. And if your redline is a couple thousand rpms higher than another car, you can stay in your gears even longer. For the NSX, the gears are shorter than our cars and the revs are higher. Explains how its acceleration is higher than most of the cars you listed.
Yeah, I thought about the gearing, but I figured if the NSX was geared any lower than our car that it would have to make a shift to 3rd before reaching 60 mph and that would slow it down...I don't know.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 1
From: coto de caza, ca
Originally posted by joeshow750
Yeah, I thought about the gearing, but I figured if the NSX was geared any lower than our car that it would have to make a shift to 3rd before reaching 60 mph and that would slow it down...I don't know.
Yeah, I thought about the gearing, but I figured if the NSX was geared any lower than our car that it would have to make a shift to 3rd before reaching 60 mph and that would slow it down...I don't know.
Originally posted by rodH
but the higher redline can make up for that (imagine the speed you could reach if our cars redlined at 8000k RPMs)
but the higher redline can make up for that (imagine the speed you could reach if our cars redlined at 8000k RPMs)
yes...but our cars actually make power below 5000rpms...while cars that redline @ 8000 and above don't. A higher redline doesn't automatically make your car faster.
Originally posted by BriGuyMax
A higher redline doesn't automatically make your car faster.
A higher redline doesn't automatically make your car faster.
Well, the NSX actually doesn't feel like it doesn't have power in the lower rpms. It's actually really awesome to drive as a daily driver. Hands down, if I had found a good 93 and up NSX before I got the Z, I don't think I would've gotten my car. I can almost say that the NSX is a better daily driven car if you believe it or not.
Originally posted by BriGuyMax
look at my STOCK dyno numbers in my sig. 244rwhp (I got 243) would be exactly 287 at the crank with a 15% drivetrain loss. Which isn't bad at all for a front-engine, rear-wheel drive car. I don't think the Z is overrated at all.
look at my STOCK dyno numbers in my sig. 244rwhp (I got 243) would be exactly 287 at the crank with a 15% drivetrain loss. Which isn't bad at all for a front-engine, rear-wheel drive car. I don't think the Z is overrated at all.
Originally posted by rodH
but the higher redline can make up for that (imagine the speed you could reach if our cars redlined at 8000k RPMs)
but the higher redline can make up for that (imagine the speed you could reach if our cars redlined at 8000k RPMs)
Originally posted by joeshow750
I don't understand how the NSX is so fast. Looking at the #'s I'm wondering how the it's faster than the 911. 911 has 6 more hp, 34 more tq, weighs 51 pounds less, and they both have rear engine, so drivetrain less should be close. Yet the NSX is faster in the 0-60.
I don't understand how the NSX is so fast. Looking at the #'s I'm wondering how the it's faster than the 911. 911 has 6 more hp, 34 more tq, weighs 51 pounds less, and they both have rear engine, so drivetrain less should be close. Yet the NSX is faster in the 0-60.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
From: Dallas TX ~ M Streets off Lower Greenville
A big point that I think yall have missed..... Lookat the dyno sheets for hp and torque and how the gearing is affected for each car....
For example, the M3 redlines at 8000 rpm but when I shift to 2nd, 3rd or 4th the revs never drop below 6XXX rpm staying well within my big powerband.
Even though the M3 makes less torque than the Z, what matters is where the torque/hp curves are at durring the acceleration run. While the Z may have a **peak** torque # that is higher than these cars, what really matters is what the torque curve looks like over the whole range....specifically 5000 rpm to redline.
Theoretically, In an acceleration run my M3 would start at a 4000 rpm drop w/ a clutch feathering and then never drop to less than 6XXX rpm in gears 2nd-6th.
Does that make sense?
Can someone post a dyno sheet??
Oh,
TX style.... I am back from vacation but traveling to Chicago this week for work. I am back on Monday so maybe we could arrange a "friendly run" next week?? I am around Tuesday, Thursday and Friday.
For example, the M3 redlines at 8000 rpm but when I shift to 2nd, 3rd or 4th the revs never drop below 6XXX rpm staying well within my big powerband.
Even though the M3 makes less torque than the Z, what matters is where the torque/hp curves are at durring the acceleration run. While the Z may have a **peak** torque # that is higher than these cars, what really matters is what the torque curve looks like over the whole range....specifically 5000 rpm to redline.
Theoretically, In an acceleration run my M3 would start at a 4000 rpm drop w/ a clutch feathering and then never drop to less than 6XXX rpm in gears 2nd-6th.
Does that make sense?
Can someone post a dyno sheet??
Oh,
TX style.... I am back from vacation but traveling to Chicago this week for work. I am back on Monday so maybe we could arrange a "friendly run" next week?? I am around Tuesday, Thursday and Friday.
I would guess mainly gearing... Just look at the BMW's like the Z4... only 225hp, but 0-60 in 5.4... of course if you look at 50-100 acceleration, we kill it (and, in fact, I have had this very race and stomped on a 3.0 z4).
Also, keep in mind that the low torque cars will have an easier time getting off the line with little tire spin. With our cars, we spin the tires like crazy (from all of the torque). I would guess that our cars would reap a larger gain from slicks than, let's say, an NSX...
Also, keep in mind that the low torque cars will have an easier time getting off the line with little tire spin. With our cars, we spin the tires like crazy (from all of the torque). I would guess that our cars would reap a larger gain from slicks than, let's say, an NSX...
Guest
Posts: n/a
i really want to race an "old gen. nsx"(before new 2003), and see how i do, there is a red automatic that cruises down the local "strip". i didn't know that m3s could rev up that high, that is new info to me, but do you z owners know approx where the powerband for the z33 is? i mean i've been gunning my z a lot and i think i now where the power starts kicking , around 4500 rpms + , peak tq is @ around 4800? or am i mistaken, the Z's power does flow pretty well from 4500- 6200 , anyways, i haven't been able to race the cars that i wanted to since i got the z, i want to race the nsx, rx7, and e36 and e46 m3(all stock), everything
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 1
From: coto de caza, ca
Originally posted by BlkStang
Redline doesn't mean much, I have to shift at 5200 for my best times and MPH...and my car is not too slow really for pretty close to stock.
Redline doesn't mean much, I have to shift at 5200 for my best times and MPH...and my car is not too slow really for pretty close to stock.
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 3,319
Likes: 1
From: coto de caza, ca
Originally posted by Mr B
Well, the NSX actually doesn't feel like it doesn't have power in the lower rpms. It's actually really awesome to drive as a daily driver. Hands down, if I had found a good 93 and up NSX before I got the Z, I don't think I would've gotten my car. I can almost say that the NSX is a better daily driven car if you believe it or not.
Well, the NSX actually doesn't feel like it doesn't have power in the lower rpms. It's actually really awesome to drive as a daily driver. Hands down, if I had found a good 93 and up NSX before I got the Z, I don't think I would've gotten my car. I can almost say that the NSX is a better daily driven car if you believe it or not.
This is a confusing topic, the gearing seems to make sense, but than how do you explain the 170+mph top speed for the Porsche and NSX, the M3 will do the same if it wasn't for the 155 electronic MPH limiter. The Z does 156 mph. I also notice the digital and analog speedo is off in the Z. I did 3 top speed runs with my Z and the analog was sitting on 160 everytime. BTW there was a very loud whine noise coming from the diff. from 130mph or so, and up. It was so loud I thought it was going to blow up. Good thing for warranties!!
Unless I am mistaken, the Z also has a cut off at 155 or so. I'm sure it will go much faster too (and, if I remember, there was one person who actually had the car still accelerating strongly when the limiter kicked in)




