Notices
North West Washington, Montana, Oregon, Idaho, Wyoming

soo lets talk about ford for a second

Old Dec 12, 2008 | 04:53 PM
  #1  
HaulinZ's Avatar
HaulinZ
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,913
Likes: 0
From: Seattle area
Default soo lets talk about ford for a second



the end
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #2  
sno's Avatar
sno
New Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 3,397
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
Default

All aboard the failout.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 09:19 PM
  #3  
xtrmspd's Avatar
xtrmspd
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

Nothing to talk about. All American car companies should shut down for making such chitty product for so long.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #4  
sdbarker's Avatar
sdbarker
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
From: '06 Lemans Sunset 6MT Roadster
Default

Originally Posted by xtrmspd
Nothing to talk about. All American car companies should shut down for making such chitty product for so long.
I don't think you get it.
Reply
Old Dec 12, 2008 | 10:31 PM
  #5  
Mixturepinoy's Avatar
Mixturepinoy
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 2,106
Likes: 0
From: Pacific nOWNEDwest!
Default

Originally Posted by sdbarker
I don't think you get it.
^^^ i want to say this to so many people these days..... people need to quit reading the headlines and read the whole article!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 12:25 AM
  #6  
xtrmspd's Avatar
xtrmspd
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

Read it, understand it. In short, what I said was, they just need to shut down period. When a company needs to be bailed out by the government with our tax money, they shouldn't be allowed to exist.

You boyz should try reading what I wrote.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 12:57 AM
  #7  
sdbarker's Avatar
sdbarker
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
From: '06 Lemans Sunset 6MT Roadster
Default

Originally Posted by xtrmspd
Read it, understand it. In short, what I said was, they just need to shut down period. When a company needs to be bailed out by the government with our tax money, they shouldn't be allowed to exist.

You boyz should try reading what I wrote.
I did read it. I quoted it. In fact, I'll do it again.

Originally Posted by xtrmspd
Nothing to talk about. All American car companies should shut down for making such chitty product for so long.
You should try writing what you mean.

Your two statements are not the same. There's a fundamental difference between "for making such chitty product for so long." and "needs to be bailed out by the government with our tax money, they shouldn't be allowed to exist."

It has nothing to do with making "chitty product". There are plenty of "chitty product" that are produced all the time. The issue lies in that nothing has been done to address long standing problems within the automobile industry. These companies have been in trouble and limping along since the 80s and have failed to do anything to fix the problems.

And that is why I am fundamentally opposed to the bailout plans. I fully understand the economic ramifications that will ensue when/if one or more of the Big 3 go out of business, however, I feel that it's a necessity. I understand that there will be many, many people put in dire straights in the event that a collapse occurs. I have family that works at GM.

However, business owners need to realize that they can not fail to maintain their business in a reasonable manner, let it flounder into an unrecoverable state, suffer irreparable financial damages, and expect that the government will be there, handing out OUR tax dollars to save them from the own idiocy, apathy, and complacence.

The financial industry was the start of what I presumed would be a very bad trend, and it seems as though I was right. It started with bailing them out for making poor decisions regarding a borrowers strength, securing loans against other loans, and the whole thing crumbled. Now, the Big 3 think that they should get some money because THEY made decisions. Tesla Motors is the most recent to ask for a bailout.

That's not the way things work.

I can't ask the government for a bailout because I can't afford the 80" LCD TV that I bought from Best Buy and therefore didn't make any payments, and expect to keep it. I understand that this is an almost near infinitely smaller scale analogy.

If there are no repercussions for unacceptable behavior, then there is no incentive to alter that behavior.

Last edited by sdbarker; Dec 13, 2008 at 01:00 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 12:59 AM
  #8  
AlvinHuyN's Avatar
AlvinHuyN
Nismo 370Z #697
Premier Member
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 4,580
Likes: 3
From: Los Angeles
Default

Originally Posted by sdbarker
I did read it. I quoted it. In fact, I'll do it again.



You should try writing what you mean.

Your two statements are not the same. There's a fundamental difference between "for making such chitty product for so long." and "needs to be bailed out by the government with our tax money, they shouldn't be allowed to exist."

It has nothing to do with making "chitty product". There are plenty of "chitty product" that are produced all the time. The issue lies in that nothing has been done to address long standing problems within the automobile industry. These companies have been in trouble and limping along since the 80s and have failed to do anything to fix the problems.

And that is why I am fundamentally opposed to the bailout plans. I fully understand the economic ramifications that will ensue when/if one or more of the Big 3 go out of business, however, I feel that it's a necessity. I understand that there will be many, many people put in dire straights in the event that a collapse occurs. I have family that works at GM.

However, business owners need to realize that they can not fail to maintain their business in a reasonable manner, let it flounder into an unrecoverable state, suffer irreparable financial damages, and expect that the government will be there, handing out OUR tax dollars to save them from the own idiocy, apathy, and complacence.

The financial industry was the start of what I presumed would be a very bad trend, and it seems as though I was right. It started with bailing them out for making poor decisions regarding a borrowers strength, securing loans against other loans, and the whole thing crumbled. Now, the Big 3 think that they should get some money because THEY made decisions. Tesla Motors is the most recent to ask for a bailout.

That's not the way things work.

I can't ask the government for a bailout because I can't afford the 80" LCD TV that I bought from Best Buy and therefore didn't make any payments, and expect to keep it. I understand that this is an almost near infinitely smaller scale analogy.

If there are no repercussions for unacceptable behavior, then there is no incentive to alter that behavior.


For personal reasons I do want to stay out of forum politics, but from an economic and political science standpoint I'd have to say this is very well put.

Last edited by AlvinHuyN; Dec 13, 2008 at 01:02 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 08:39 PM
  #9  
xtrmspd's Avatar
xtrmspd
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by sdbarker
I did read it. I quoted it. In fact, I'll do it again.



You should try writing what you mean.

Your two statements are not the same. There's a fundamental difference between "for making such chitty product for so long." and "needs to be bailed out by the government with our tax money, they shouldn't be allowed to exist."

It has nothing to do with making "chitty product". There are plenty of "chitty product" that are produced all the time. The issue lies in that nothing has been done to address long standing problems within the automobile industry. These companies have been in trouble and limping along since the 80s and have failed to do anything to fix the problems.

And that is why I am fundamentally opposed to the bailout plans. I fully understand the economic ramifications that will ensue when/if one or more of the Big 3 go out of business, however, I feel that it's a necessity. I understand that there will be many, many people put in dire straights in the event that a collapse occurs. I have family that works at GM.

However, business owners need to realize that they can not fail to maintain their business in a reasonable manner, let it flounder into an unrecoverable state, suffer irreparable financial damages, and expect that the government will be there, handing out OUR tax dollars to save them from the own idiocy, apathy, and complacence.

The financial industry was the start of what I presumed would be a very bad trend, and it seems as though I was right. It started with bailing them out for making poor decisions regarding a borrowers strength, securing loans against other loans, and the whole thing crumbled. Now, the Big 3 think that they should get some money because THEY made decisions. Tesla Motors is the most recent to ask for a bailout.

That's not the way things work.

I can't ask the government for a bailout because I can't afford the 80" LCD TV that I bought from Best Buy and therefore didn't make any payments, and expect to keep it. I understand that this is an almost near infinitely smaller scale analogy.

If there are no repercussions for unacceptable behavior, then there is no incentive to alter that behavior.
OK butthead, you're getting way too technical here. Can a guy just say a sentence or two without having to get soooooooooo deep into it. Sheeesh!!!! This is what happens when you drive an ORANGE car.


I see you put alot of thought into this. A**wipe.:ico n38:
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 10:06 PM
  #10  
sdbarker's Avatar
sdbarker
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
From: '06 Lemans Sunset 6MT Roadster
Default

Originally Posted by xtrmspd
OK butthead, you're getting way too technical here. Can a guy just say a sentence or two without having to get soooooooooo deep into it. Sheeesh!!!! This is what happens when you drive an ORANGE car.


I see you put alot of thought into this. A**wipe.:ico n38:
You can when you don't contradict yourself or go around shitting in threads. :-D

And I did put a lot of thought in to it. It's a decision that will very dramatically affect the state of our country. To me, that's important and worth a lot of thought.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 11:48 PM
  #11  
Looks Fast's Avatar
Looks Fast
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
From: Seattle
Default

Well I haven't gone into this with much detail, and I don't care to jump into the drama in the previous posts. All I got to say is, someone has to do something about the unions with some of these companies... US Auto, Boeing (sorry if anyone works at boeing), Airline companies, etc. I find they make it a lot more difficult to manage a company. Not saying that US auto companies didn't bring this upon themselves, but the unions didn't help. My 2 cents.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2008 | 11:58 PM
  #12  
350LowLife's Avatar
350LowLife
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: In my Mind
Default

We should Unite to abolish Unions....kind of like an Anti-Union Union.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 12:15 AM
  #13  
sdbarker's Avatar
sdbarker
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
From: '06 Lemans Sunset 6MT Roadster
Default

I don't know much about unions, but based on what I do know, I'd have to agree with both of you.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 01:19 AM
  #14  
killa.beez33's Avatar
killa.beez33
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,783
Likes: 0
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by AlvinHuyN
For personal reasons I do want to stay out of forum politics, but from an economic and political science standpoint I'd have to say this is very well put.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 09:09 AM
  #15  
Jeff92se's Avatar
Jeff92se
New Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 44,920
Likes: 1,080
From: nw
Default

Originally Posted by xtrmspd
Read it, understand it. In short, what I said was, they just need to shut down period. When a company needs to be bailed out by the government with our tax money, they shouldn't be allowed to exist.

You boyz should try reading what I wrote.
Nissan needed to be bailed out by Renault
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 09:20 AM
  #16  
zland's Avatar
zland
Sponsor
Sport Z Magazine
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 6,086
Likes: 48
From: Oceanside Ca
Default

Originally Posted by 350LowLife
We should Unite to abolish Unions....kind of like an Anti-Union Union.
As soon as management controls itself, unions will not be needed. I am tired of people only focusing on wage earners but not management.

" In 2000, the average CEO salary reached an unbelievable 531 times that of the average hourly worker."

http://management.about.com/cs/gener...OsOverpaid.htm
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 12:30 PM
  #17  
Netacoma2003's Avatar
Netacoma2003
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 360
Likes: 0
From: Puget Sound
Default

The 3 ignorant posts about union workers warrants a long winded and informed tongue lashing (or finger lashing in this case), however, since I'm at work and don't have the time to lash appropriately, I shall recuse myself from enlightining you all with my opine and business acumen.

Edit.....This is why I don't surf the political forums.....I should just stick to mod discussions!!

I also thought SDBarkers post (#7) was a good one.


Thanks

Last edited by Netacoma2003; Dec 14, 2008 at 12:53 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 01:13 PM
  #18  
sdbarker's Avatar
sdbarker
New Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3,148
Likes: 0
From: '06 Lemans Sunset 6MT Roadster
Default

Originally Posted by Netacoma2003
The 3 ignorant posts about union workers warrants a long winded and informed tongue lashing (or finger lashing in this case), however, since I'm at work and don't have the time to lash appropriately, I shall recuse myself from enlightining you all with my opine and business acumen.

Edit.....This is why I don't surf the political forums.....I should just stick to mod discussions!!

I also thought SDBarkers post (#7) was a good one.


Thanks
I'm all for the information. Hook it up!

And, thanks.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 08:39 PM
  #19  
xtrmspd's Avatar
xtrmspd
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by Jeff92se
Nissan needed to be bailed out by Renault
That's from another Manufacturer not everyones tax money.
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2008 | 08:43 PM
  #20  
xtrmspd's Avatar
xtrmspd
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 787
Likes: 0
From: Washington
Default

Originally Posted by sdbarker
You can when you don't contradict yourself or go around shitting in threads. :-D

And I did put a lot of thought in to it. It's a decision that will very dramatically affect the state of our country. To me, that's important and worth a lot of thought.
How is that contradicting myself? They both say the same thing (pretty much) except I added a sentence about the bail out.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:46 AM.