s2k or z roadster? which do you prefer?
Originally Posted by LT_350Z
bad example except for the wheels....s2k all the way
That what I was thinking. Can't tell if sarcasm was present or not. Too much stuff going on, front is ugly minus the intercooler, rear is WAAY ugly minus... well nothing redeeming with the rear. Not feeling the hood either.
I like the s2k with a hardtop but that puts the whole convertible thing out the window. The ZR with the top off is nice, but the top up look is just UGLY UGLY UGLY. Can't imagine any ZR users agreeing it looks good with the top up.
Have you considered the Saturn Sky Redline or the Solstice GXP. The redline is awesome... Saw one the other day that had me turning my head backwards to look. Suspension and drivetrain is not as nice as the Z or s2k as I've heard but great looking cars imo.
Last edited by SoldzMyZ; Mar 21, 2008 at 01:40 AM.
..... I was joking
Sponsor
Shine Auto Project
Shine Auto Project
iTrader: (89)
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,517
Likes: 0
From: osaka ~ los angeles[213]
that one FI'ed my nismo sponsored silver roadster i saw on import tuner and formula D last year was a pretty sick car rocking a JP type N kit and some volks....
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (20)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 0
From: Monterey Park, CA
lol if it was in the s2k thread. i think it would be opposite. they wouldnt even take the regular Z over an s2k. and on top of that they would talk smack about the z. haha
I love the S2K and do agree that it is overpriced. It is a beautiful car. Compared to the Z roadster I would take the S2k....but I would like to add that I would take this Z roadster any day. This is one of my favorite cars that I have seen, much props to Built2shredZ.... 
