AEM piggyback
#2
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: So cal
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by booger
I heard and seen a few adds on the AEM piggyback . My sop owner seems to think it has total control over timing . Does anyone know if this is true ? And has anyone seen or used the unit ?
works quite well for F/I
#3
Originally Posted by unchi
has total fuel control and can retard timing from stock if necessary
works quite well for F/I
works quite well for F/I
When you say retard timing from stock....do you mean just off setting it ? If stock is 26 degree's advanced at WOT . Do you put in....say....10 . So final timing would be 16 degree advance ?
THANKS !!!!!!
#6
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
those who don't like how a UTEC behaves generally are not well versed in how to tune it...it's quite easy to use, but like anything, past experience very much dictates how it all goes.
Anything that has it's own drivers can dial in exact timing. On the old Emanage Blue, it required additional harnesses to do timing. On the new Emanage Ultimate, not sure if its the same or not...never used one, nor would I at this point, given how well the UTEC works.
Anything that has it's own drivers can dial in exact timing. On the old Emanage Blue, it required additional harnesses to do timing. On the new Emanage Ultimate, not sure if its the same or not...never used one, nor would I at this point, given how well the UTEC works.
#7
Originally Posted by Z1 Performance
those who don't like how a UTEC behaves generally are not well versed in how to tune it...it's quite easy to use, but like anything, past experience very much dictates how it all goes.
Anything that has it's own drivers can dial in exact timing. On the old Emanage Blue, it required additional harnesses to do timing. On the new Emanage Ultimate, not sure if its the same or not...never used one, nor would I at this point, given how well the UTEC works.
Anything that has it's own drivers can dial in exact timing. On the old Emanage Blue, it required additional harnesses to do timing. On the new Emanage Ultimate, not sure if its the same or not...never used one, nor would I at this point, given how well the UTEC works.
Like I said , Im just looking at all possibilities and like to know how all of them work . The only thing Ive ever seen is the SS box .
Trending Topics
#8
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The AEM box works as stated above. Complete control over fuel (boost referencing available) but will only retard/advance timing from the stock curve not complete ignition control. At least thats what the last article I read said. Theres a short write up in last month's issue of Modified Mag. I'll scan and post tonight for you.
#9
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
The AEM box works as stated above. Complete control over fuel (boost referencing available) but will only retard/advance timing from the stock curve not complete ignition control. At least thats what the last article I read said. Theres a short write up in last month's issue of Modified Mag. I'll scan and post tonight for you.
If thats what the artical says . Dont bother going through the trouble of scanning and posting it . I wouldnt use it if thats how it works . It wouldnt be much better than the SS box Ive got .
Thanks for the info guys ! !
#10
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by booger
Mia
If thats what the artical says . Dont bother going through the trouble of scanning and posting it . I wouldnt use it if thats how it works . It wouldnt be much better than the SS box Ive got .
Thanks for the info guys ! !
If thats what the artical says . Dont bother going through the trouble of scanning and posting it . I wouldnt use it if thats how it works . It wouldnt be much better than the SS box Ive got .
Thanks for the info guys ! !
I'll double check the article tonight. If its other then what I posted I'll scan and post.
EDIT:
Nevermind, quick look at their site confirms its only adjustments. No 100% control for timing. It does do 100% injector control though:
http://aempower.com/ViewCategory.aspx?CategoryID=116
Last edited by MIAPLAYA; 07-12-2007 at 08:08 AM.
#11
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Blue Roof City, NOLA
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
The AEM box works as stated above. Complete control over fuel (boost referencing available) but will only retard/advance timing from the stock curve not complete ignition control. At least thats what the last article I read said.
#12
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Blue Roof City, NOLA
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by booger
Mia
If thats what the artical says . Dont bother going through the trouble of scanning and posting it . I wouldnt use it if thats how it works . It wouldnt be much better than the SS box Ive got .
Thanks for the info guys ! !
If thats what the artical says . Dont bother going through the trouble of scanning and posting it . I wouldnt use it if thats how it works . It wouldnt be much better than the SS box Ive got .
Thanks for the info guys ! !
#13
Originally Posted by panapower
if SS you mean split second, IMHO its much better than SS. you can tune real time with the FI/C unlike the SS. that right there is a huge advantage. to me at least.
#14
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Blue Roof City, NOLA
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by booger
When I said SS box...I meant Split Second and the R$ software to tune it . With it , you off set injector pulse width + or - and timing is only retarding timing by offset also .
#15
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Escondido
Posts: 11,373
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by panapower
yep, were familiar with it as well but we'd rather be able to do steady state tuning and with the FI/C its possible.
#16
Registered User
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Blue Roof City, NOLA
Posts: 419
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by MIAPLAYA
I think Boogs point is why would he spend the money on an EMS that does exactly what his SS box can do sans real time adjustments. He's already installing the UTEC and was looking for a better solution in the same price range. The AEM F/IC is not it. Boog, just pony up for the Haltech when its out. It'll be far more worth it. Between all the Fcon features, PLUS cam timing control, and end user tuneable its going to be your best bet. I know you like to tweak like I do and thats my choice right now.
#17
Im still running the SplitSecond piggyback . And if it could do 20psi instead of 16psi max . I would stay with it for awhile and flash the stock ECU to run both the regular and aggresive maps at the same timing .
Im actually thinking between the Utec and AEM standalone from Sound Performance . And right now I dont like the idea of forking out $3000 for the AEM and to get it tuned
Im actually thinking between the Utec and AEM standalone from Sound Performance . And right now I dont like the idea of forking out $3000 for the AEM and to get it tuned
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bcoffee20
Zs & Gs For Sale
5
11-19-2015 06:39 PM
350Shadow
NorCal Marketplace
0
09-22-2015 08:30 AM