Amuse 350z vs. MCR R34 Skyline Touge Battle!
11-06-2006, 03:33 PM
#22
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Whorelando
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Any one knw how to get our Zs at that hp man god they must release the details. That amuse Z is rediculous and they didnt even touch the intake is the stock intake that well not even a pop charger. lool
11-06-2006, 04:57 PM
#23
New Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jersey, New
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The intake doesn't do much so why bother. Hell the stock intake is probably better than my intake.
I think the biggest difference in that car was the ECU/wheels/tires. HP aint nothing if you can't control it. I remmeber seeing the 350Z NA battle, and the amuse car was fast, but the thing that the driver liked most about it was how the power was delivered.
Apparently, on a Z, 255/265 tires is the best combination on the track, w/ superlightweight tires and a powerful ECU
I think the biggest difference in that car was the ECU/wheels/tires. HP aint nothing if you can't control it. I remmeber seeing the 350Z NA battle, and the amuse car was fast, but the thing that the driver liked most about it was how the power was delivered.
Apparently, on a Z, 255/265 tires is the best combination on the track, w/ superlightweight tires and a powerful ECU
11-06-2006, 06:49 PM
#26
New Member
iTrader: (10)
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Jersey, New
Posts: 7,146
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Idk. Japan is way ahead of the USA in terms of NA tuning. I wish we had some of that know how. You also forget that crawford is just one of a hand ful of shops in the US that are into NA tuning. In japan, its ALL about NA tuning.
11-06-2006, 10:23 PM
#29
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 437
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RBlover69
how are they able to get that much of a 287 vq and teams like crawford cant reach a rep 300rwd im stumped is it there tuning technique.
Jason
11-06-2006, 11:21 PM
#33
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 193
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Perhaps weight might've been another factor.
stock GTR weighs 100 kg's more than a stock Z.
Amuse Z was said to have saved an additional 100kg's
so that's a total of 200 kg diff between both cars. that 200 x 2.2 = +400lbs.
stock GTR weighs 100 kg's more than a stock Z.
Amuse Z was said to have saved an additional 100kg's
so that's a total of 200 kg diff between both cars. that 200 x 2.2 = +400lbs.
11-07-2006, 09:46 PM
#34
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Whorelando
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
there was a power diff none the less that Z wons alot on that course. But imagine a buggati vrs a exige. Exige would own it preety bad.. The skyline couldnt put the power down aswell as the Z bottom line. Well it also helps when ur like 100 hp less and more lol
11-07-2006, 10:38 PM
#36
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 491
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The Amuse Z owns it. *Drool. Lightweight, entire exhaust system is titanium, sounds like a exotic...I wish Amuse would make some bada$$ lightweight fenders and doors for the G. I'd be all over it.
11-07-2006, 11:27 PM
#37
Retired Admin
iTrader: (95)
Originally Posted by RBlover69
there was a power diff none the less that Z wons alot on that course. But imagine a buggati vrs a exige. Exige would own it preety bad.. The skyline couldnt put the power down aswell as the Z bottom line. Well it also helps when ur like 100 hp less and more lol
11-08-2006, 05:13 AM
#38
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Whorelando
Posts: 2,995
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 3hree5ive0ero
What?
