Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

40lbs loss on wheels how much quicker?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-05-2005, 12:20 PM
  #21  
doodeitstom
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
doodeitstom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: dallas
Posts: 741
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jenny Craig could improve some of your guys 1/4 times.
Old 02-05-2005, 04:22 PM
  #22  
Armitage
350Z-holic
iTrader: (15)
 
Armitage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 5,163
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally posted by doodeitstom
Jenny Craig could improve some of your guys 1/4 times.
Not if your like me... 5'7" and 140 lbs. I want to put weight on a bit.
Old 02-05-2005, 04:22 PM
  #23  
JonsilvZ
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
JonsilvZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NYC Area
Posts: 2,170
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by ZpikeZ
No kidding. That was one of the main reasons why i dumped my fat *** girlfriend last month.
Old 02-05-2005, 04:53 PM
  #24  
StarcraftBW
Registered User
iTrader: (10)
 
StarcraftBW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fairfax, VA
Posts: 960
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

so what is the weight for 350z track rim? how much lighter compare to stock 17"?
Old 02-05-2005, 06:26 PM
  #25  
NzZ
New Member
 
NzZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: LV
Posts: 984
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Armitage
Not if your like me... 5'7" and 140 lbs. I want to put weight on a bit.
Fatass, I'm 5'7" and 135. Totally JK, wish I could put some more muscle on...but hey if being skinny makes my car faster...I better not work out.

NzZ
Old 02-05-2005, 06:51 PM
  #26  
FLZ_Boy
Registered User
 
FLZ_Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Hiding in So. Cal
Posts: 1,001
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by StarcraftBW
so what is the weight for 350z track rim? how much lighter compare to stock 17"?
The stock 17" rims are 23 - 24 lbs. The 18" track rims weigh roughly 18 lbs.

5 ~ 6 lbs. difference, however, the diameters are different. I wouldn't expect huge gains on 1/4 mile runs, but you'll see a difference in handling, since the 18" are wider.
Old 03-28-2005, 08:16 PM
  #27  
typeR
Registered User
 
typeR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: port richey Fl.
Posts: 474
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I WENT WITH ssr COMPETITIONS 14.3 LBS compared to 26lb stock 17's gained a 10th in the 1/8th mile
Old 03-28-2005, 09:58 PM
  #28  
Shamblin
Registered User
 
Shamblin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Another dimension
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZpikeZ
No kidding. That was one of the main reasons why i dumped my fat *** girlfriend last month.
Good one!

Good posts too on gains from reducing rotating mass vs. just dropping a few lbs. from chunking the spare.
Got the Nismo lightweight flywheel on, plus the Rays rims that come on the Track, and a set of Goodyear F1GSD3's coming (front's are on perpetual backorder) which according to The Tire Rack will save another 10 lbs. of rotating mass over the OEM Potenza's.

DIE, rotating mass . . . DIE !!!
Old 03-28-2005, 10:18 PM
  #29  
Shamblin
Registered User
 
Shamblin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Another dimension
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Speaking of rotating mass . . .

'Bout time to rotate m' *** up off the couch and fetch another miller lite . . .
Old 03-28-2005, 11:31 PM
  #30  
DSGMach714
Registered User
 
DSGMach714's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Coming from a long history of drag racing, unsprung weight yields much more advantage than sprung weight. 40 lbs difference from the wheels is good for a .2 off your ET.. When I would run skinnies on my front with my Mustang, I would consistantly run .2 to .3 faster in the quarter mile..
Old 03-29-2005, 08:27 PM
  #31  
Shamblin
Registered User
 
Shamblin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Another dimension
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by DSGMach714
Coming from a long history of drag racing, unsprung weight yields much more advantage than sprung weight. 40 lbs difference from the wheels is good for a .2 off your ET.. When I would run skinnies on my front with my Mustang, I would consistantly run .2 to .3 faster in the quarter mile..
DSGMach714, I think this post started on the subject of sprung weight and then migrated to it's more sophistcated cousin, roatating mass. One guy even brought up rotational inertia as in where the weight is concentrated, like near the center (best), or on the outer edge (worst).

Talking about the skinnies: No doubt on the rotating mass weight loss. You may also had some slightly better aerodynamics happenin' too that might have helped out a little, specially if your "fatties" stuck out from the front fender wells.

When you say 40 lbs. in reference to my situation, are you thinking I meant 10 lbs. per wheel? I meant 2.5 lbs per wheel for a total of 10, but hereagain it's rotating mass so hey I'm happy!

Rotating Mass

Last edited by Shamblin; 03-29-2005 at 08:31 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Obadabot
Maintenance & Repair
16
06-18-2023 11:31 PM
ablaine
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z
51
11-29-2016 10:13 AM



Quick Reply: 40lbs loss on wheels how much quicker?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:30 AM.