Speed/Quickness
#21
Wow! This is a real thread going on here. I'm GETTING EXCITED!
Here's my 2c. You're all right!
Just don't let me catch you at my favorite track with those Bose Sterio brakes of yours. Ha! Real men don't even need A/C let alone heated seats!
BTW: Real men live in tepid climates
Here's my 2c. You're all right!
Just don't let me catch you at my favorite track with those Bose Sterio brakes of yours. Ha! Real men don't even need A/C let alone heated seats!
BTW: Real men live in tepid climates
Last edited by Flyingscot; 06-22-2002 at 06:12 AM.
#22
Originally posted by exsilio
Oh man...this debate...I was waiting for it to start...here we go.
In the real world I'd rather cruise the boulevard in my heated leather seats, listening to my upgraded bose *snip* and sipping on my latte as I check out my navigation...
Oh man...this debate...I was waiting for it to start...here we go.
In the real world I'd rather cruise the boulevard in my heated leather seats, listening to my upgraded bose *snip* and sipping on my latte as I check out my navigation...
Let’s just say you're driving along with your wife when you take a corner a little too quick (cause your stock brakes didn't slow you in time). Your wife reacts violently to your sudden maneuver and accidentally jabs her knee into the fragile little cup holder with you piping hot Latte. While trying not to scream from the pain emanating from your southern region, you fail to notice a small amount of coffee seeping into the guts of your Nav system.
Well this spells big trouble for you when the Nav system promptly shorts out leaving you stranded in the middle of nowhere. Of course you didn't bring your $10.00 map because why should you, you bought a Nav system. So, there you are stuck in the middle of nowhere with a wife who's becoming increasingly more upset with her predicament. Trying to calm her down, you turn to your wife with a slightly crooked smile and say,
"Well at least we still have our heated seats."
Of course, you're in the middle of New Mexico and it's 110deg outside. Suffice to say, she's not amused!
Now this scenario is just one example of why I chose to buy the track model instead. So all I can say is GOOD LUCK!
Last edited by Flyingscot; 06-22-2002 at 06:54 AM.
#23
Originally posted by Flyingscot
BTW: Real men live in tepid climates
BTW: Real men live in tepid climates
Last edited by blackSunshine; 06-22-2002 at 06:51 AM.
#24
Originally posted by raceboy
In reality your car insurance is still plenty valid on the racetrack. However, it is NOT valid in a competitive event. This means that if you want to attend hot lapping track days you can do it without the fear of your insurance company balking at the claim, but if you plan on racing wheel to wheel or if you plan on doing time trial events you are not covered. Rule of thumb: If there is a trophy or money at the end of the day then you ARE NOT covered. Otherwise a racetrack is no different than any other piece of private property for insurance purposes.
In reality your car insurance is still plenty valid on the racetrack. However, it is NOT valid in a competitive event. This means that if you want to attend hot lapping track days you can do it without the fear of your insurance company balking at the claim, but if you plan on racing wheel to wheel or if you plan on doing time trial events you are not covered. Rule of thumb: If there is a trophy or money at the end of the day then you ARE NOT covered. Otherwise a racetrack is no different than any other piece of private property for insurance purposes.
Ah, really? That's very nice to know. All the events I go to are untimed events with no wheel-to-wheel racing allowed. (Events such as the Thunderhill track school in California) It's good to hear that my insurance might actually be okay if something happened.
On that note, has anyone here actually called their insurance companies and asked them about this? I might do so just to see what they say.
#25
Excilio, you really think the Brembos are only gonna get you 3-5 feet better braking? Don't get me wrong, I don't know squat about this but it just seems like a $3000 performance option like that would be worth more than just 3-5 feet
#27
Originally posted by jreiter
Ah, really? That's very nice to know. All the events I go to are untimed events with no wheel-to-wheel racing allowed. (Events such as the Thunderhill track school in California) It's good to hear that my insurance might actually be okay if something happened.
On that note, has anyone here actually called their insurance companies and asked them about this? I might do so just to see what they say.
Ah, really? That's very nice to know. All the events I go to are untimed events with no wheel-to-wheel racing allowed. (Events such as the Thunderhill track school in California) It's good to hear that my insurance might actually be okay if something happened.
On that note, has anyone here actually called their insurance companies and asked them about this? I might do so just to see what they say.
#28
Originally posted by Dr Bonz
Excilio, you really think the Brembos are only gonna get you 3-5 feet better braking? Don't get me wrong, I don't know squat about this but it just seems like a $3000 performance option like that would be worth more than just 3-5 feet
Excilio, you really think the Brembos are only gonna get you 3-5 feet better braking? Don't get me wrong, I don't know squat about this but it just seems like a $3000 performance option like that would be worth more than just 3-5 feet
All of the other models might stop within the same distance as the track intially(sp), but after repeated attempts, the brembo's on the track will last much longer.
#29
rotational mass
Originally posted by exsilio
Oh man...this debate...I was waiting for it to start...here we go.
HOLD ONTO YOUR FOREIGN PARTS!!!
50lb of difference...sprung/un-sprung who gives a crap?!
That's it 50lb diff...0-60 might be a tad diff of .005 secs.
Stopping speed will be better by maybe 3-5 feet...
In the real world I'd rather cruise the boulevard in my heated leather seats, listening to my upgraded bose (bose haters please dont flame me), and sipping on my latte as I check out my navigation...the best 50lb money can buy.
FYI, I do dig the RAYS and the Brembos though...I'm not jealous dammit, not one bit.
Oh man...this debate...I was waiting for it to start...here we go.
HOLD ONTO YOUR FOREIGN PARTS!!!
50lb of difference...sprung/un-sprung who gives a crap?!
That's it 50lb diff...0-60 might be a tad diff of .005 secs.
Stopping speed will be better by maybe 3-5 feet...
In the real world I'd rather cruise the boulevard in my heated leather seats, listening to my upgraded bose (bose haters please dont flame me), and sipping on my latte as I check out my navigation...the best 50lb money can buy.
FYI, I do dig the RAYS and the Brembos though...I'm not jealous dammit, not one bit.
So here is something to think about:
if the stock 18s weigh around 25 pounds and the Rays weigh around 16 pounds...each wheel would weigh 9 pounds lighter x 4 wheels = 36 pounds lighter. Once the car begins in motion motion 36 pounds x 7 = 252 pounds lighter. I belive that could be an amount that you would notice in acceleration, handling, braking.
just my 2 cents...flame away.
- Josh
PS. Here are my heavy wheels
#31
Guest
Posts: n/a
As I tried to point out before...I'm talking real world effectiveness will be nominal at best, as in, it won't be noticed.
And as I stated before, sprung, unsprung, it simply wont matter out on the raods...ona track it will make a slight difference, but essentially when the cars will be this close in specs, it boils down the the driver not the sprung/unsprung weight.
Bonz,
I really do believe that, and I think dvlad helped clarify the point. The brembos are indeed awesome, but they won't necessarily make a huge diff in straight line braking..but they should offer less fade and a shorter stopping distance...but not by much...in the real world. Now out on the track it's a whole different thing...you are braking all the time...while I am sure the stock 350z brakes are nice, they will not last as long or perform as consistently as the brembos...and that's what people are paying for. That is why it is the track version...
And as I stated before, sprung, unsprung, it simply wont matter out on the raods...ona track it will make a slight difference, but essentially when the cars will be this close in specs, it boils down the the driver not the sprung/unsprung weight.
Bonz,
I really do believe that, and I think dvlad helped clarify the point. The brembos are indeed awesome, but they won't necessarily make a huge diff in straight line braking..but they should offer less fade and a shorter stopping distance...but not by much...in the real world. Now out on the track it's a whole different thing...you are braking all the time...while I am sure the stock 350z brakes are nice, they will not last as long or perform as consistently as the brembos...and that's what people are paying for. That is why it is the track version...
#32
wait for the tests and reviews before making assumptions. Weight makes a difference. I'm looking for a track car where every little thing like weight counts, not a boulevard cruiser. YMMV.
Last edited by iMR2; 06-22-2002 at 11:44 PM.
#33
the only thing i changed in my car was going to heavier wheels (5 lbs heavier) and I notice a difference in every day driving...as have other people that have driven my car. Sounds like real world to me.
I will say this. If you don't drive the track version with the lighter wheels, you will never know the difference from the other models. So I wouldn't worry about it. You can always purchase the track wheels down the road.
I will say this. If you don't drive the track version with the lighter wheels, you will never know the difference from the other models. So I wouldn't worry about it. You can always purchase the track wheels down the road.
#34
Guest
Posts: n/a
I have made zero assumptions...you can't argue with the laws of physics...there just simply will not be that big of a diff...if there is, I'll buy you a tee shirt imr2... my argument is based on logic, not the passion of owning the track version of the Z.
#35
exsilio,
we agree to disagree. that's cool.
As with the Spyder it's the tech specs that i find the Z attractive. I frequent non competitive open track events and one of the best things about the Spyder is it's light weight. I'm able to take and hang with more powerful cars out there on track. BTW, if i do get a Z it'll be a enthusiast or performance model (not sure if i'd want VDC) with aftermarket brake upgrades and my own choice of light weight wheels.
we agree to disagree. that's cool.
As with the Spyder it's the tech specs that i find the Z attractive. I frequent non competitive open track events and one of the best things about the Spyder is it's light weight. I'm able to take and hang with more powerful cars out there on track. BTW, if i do get a Z it'll be a enthusiast or performance model (not sure if i'd want VDC) with aftermarket brake upgrades and my own choice of light weight wheels.
Last edited by iMR2; 06-23-2002 at 12:43 AM.
#38
Excilio, you know there is one simple way to end all of these assaults on you concerning the Track vs other Z's..........Just join us! Dump your preorder and buy a Track! Yes, Excilio.....listen to the soothing sound of my voice.......Track is good......Track is inner peace....Track is tranquil.............Yes......Join us my friend.....join us in paradise! (insert your own goofy sounding TM Mantra here)
#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
must
order
track
must
order
track
big shiny brakes
.0005% faster
must have unsprung wight reduction
must...
....rosebud...
ha ha doc...I love the track version...in retrospect I might have considered it..but I am happy with my selection...the bottomline...we will all be happy come that day.
must
order
track
must
order
track
big shiny brakes
.0005% faster
must have unsprung wight reduction
must...
....rosebud...
ha ha doc...I love the track version...in retrospect I might have considered it..but I am happy with my selection...the bottomline...we will all be happy come that day.
#40
Personally I ordered a Track because I, well.............. drive on the track!! If you won't track the car then it doesn't really matter. However, I also feel that a sports car is just that so if it's the luxury you really want, why not buy a G35?? I also have an I35, that's my luxo car and my Z is my track car. I personally never understood buying a car for looks or image. My MR2 Spyder is ugly as hell but it's pure magic on the track. My biggest fear is the Z won't have the magic the 2200lb mid engined MR2 has on the track. I am not a bad driver if I don't say so myself (ask iMR2) and it has been really fun humbling much faster and more expensive cars on the track. I hope the Z just takes me to the next level. And of course it's marketing. The marketing dept gave the fastest car to the mags to generate the best numbers regardless of what the other models are capable of (my take on things at least). I would also be willing to bet that over a 30 minute session with equal drivers the track will be 2 seconds a lap (average lap 80-120 seconds) so the Track will be 1.6-2.5% faster not .0005!!! LOL
Last edited by raceboy; 06-23-2002 at 08:35 AM.