Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Torque: Does it really matter THAT much?

Old Jul 10, 2005 | 04:37 AM
  #21  
Barzten1's Avatar
Barzten1
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,285
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Default

Wish My torque matched my hp!
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 05:42 AM
  #22  
ken350z's Avatar
ken350z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by XxKrNxStyLeZxX
Can anyone explain to me, just generally, the difference between torque and horsepower? I know the formula and all the normal stuff everyone says, but I've never really understand the whole concept of horsepower and torque.
Horsepower is the product of torque and speed. Or... HP = torque x speed.

1 HP = 33,000 ft-lbs per min Or 1HP = 33,000ft-lbs/min OR 550ft-lbs/sec

So, lifting 550 lbs one foot in one sec is one hp.

If it takes two secs to lift it you got 1/2 HP. If you can lift 1100 lbs in one sec you got 2 HP.

If you were making a bulldozer you want a lot of torque but you aren't in a big hurry. If you were making something to set a speed record at Bonniville you want a lot of speed but only just enough torque to get you up to speed by the time you get to the starting line. You ever notice that the motorcycles there need a push to get going.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 08:45 AM
  #23  
arejohn's Avatar
arejohn
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 409
Likes: 0
From: durham, NC
Default

You drive with torque and race with HP.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 09:50 AM
  #24  
FormulaRX's Avatar
FormulaRX
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
Default

Just to make note of one of my pete peves: remember Torque is measured by "Pounds per Feet" (or Kilograms per Meter if you're in Japan and Newtons per Meter if you're in Europe) not "Feet per Pounds" or "Foot-Pounds" like those muscle car guys always say. It's always measured by weight over distance...
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 10:58 AM
  #25  
Jsn350Z's Avatar
Jsn350Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,981
Likes: 0
From: Los Gatos, CA
Default

Tacoma vs 350Z?? O.o

I would not think that there could possibly be any doubts in anyones mind about that one...

TQ is important in the low rpm's. HP is important in the high rpm's. TQ is that initial UMFH while HP is what keeps you going.

For example, an s2k can do 0-60 in the high 5's with 153 ft/lb tq while a Z can also do 0-60 in the high 5's with 274 ft/lb tq. That will mostly depend on the driver, and the s2k will take more skill to do so, but you have to take weight, gearing, and many other factors into it as well.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 11:14 AM
  #26  
Russ@Z1's Avatar
Russ@Z1
New Member
iTrader: (65)
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,493
Likes: 19
From: georgia
Default

unless the tacoma owner changes the tranny and rear end setup, he'll have nothing but bottem end power off the line. After that, it's all downhill in a race.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 01:16 PM
  #27  
ken350z's Avatar
ken350z
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 576
Likes: 0
From: Connecticut
Default

Originally Posted by FormulaRX
Just to make note of one of my pete peves: remember Torque is measured by "Pounds per Feet" (or Kilograms per Meter if you're in Japan and Newtons per Meter if you're in Europe) not "Feet per Pounds" or "Foot-Pounds" like those muscle car guys always say. It's always measured by weight over distance...
I think you need another pet peve.... Torque is NOT measured in Pounds PER Foot (or whatever units you care to use). Pounds PER foot implies Pounds/feet. This is NOT correct.

Torque is Pounds multiplied by feet. This is why pound-feet AND foot-pounds is equally correct. No matter which comes first, the result is the same.

Check your high school science book or google, it's easy to find.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 02:00 PM
  #28  
fg3's Avatar
fg3
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default This explains it all fairly clearly

HP & Torque
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #29  
whatmaname's Avatar
whatmaname
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
From: ny
Default

I CANT WAIT FOR MY Z only 48 hours of freaking waiting left!
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 02:11 PM
  #30  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by ken350z
I think you need another pet peve.... Torque is NOT measured in Pounds PER Foot (or whatever units you care to use). Pounds PER foot implies Pounds/feet. This is NOT correct.

Torque is Pounds multiplied by feet. This is why pound-feet AND foot-pounds is equally correct. No matter which comes first, the result is the same.

Check your high school science book or google, it's easy to find.
+1 I was cringing when I read "pounds per feet."

It's pretty easy to remember if you think of a torque wrench... let's say the torque wrench has a 1 foot handle, and you apply 1 pound of force. There you go, 1 foot-pound of torque. Same result if you have a 1/2 foot handle and 2 pounds of force. Thus, pounds and feet are multiplied together, not divided.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 02:12 PM
  #31  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

Originally Posted by whatmaname
I CANT WAIT FOR MY Z only 48 hours of freaking waiting left!

Dude talk about an off topic post...


whatmaname: Why don't you go to a honda dealership and go test drive a civic. That way, when you get your Z it will feel just that much better to drive.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 02:20 PM
  #32  
FormulaRX's Avatar
FormulaRX
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
Default

Whoops someone shoot me now (crawls into a hole and dies)...

My post was made from an assumption that I see so many times of people writing lb/ft of torque so I assumed it was weight divded by distance. I hear Pound-Feet all the time and Foot-Pound all the time but see it written lb/ft so I didn't realize they were multiplied together. Ok now I know...thanks
But "Foot-Pounds" still doesn't sound right though...oh well
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 04:04 PM
  #33  
EdgeOfSanity's Avatar
EdgeOfSanity
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 1
From: Breckenridge, Co
Default

Originally Posted by MEI
torque here plays major role in high speeds (top ends) that's why we beat S2000 after 90 or 100 mph cuz we have higher torque.

second thing you have other things that make you in good shape like transmition, weight, suspension, and acceleration. yes your co-worker has a higher torque but when his torque starts to work you will be 10 cars ahead of him.

bottom of the line tell him "kiss my @ss"
You have absolutly no idea what you are talking about. I suggest you go over to www.howstuffworks.com and search for torque and horsepower.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 04:11 PM
  #34  
The Brickyard Rat's Avatar
The Brickyard Rat
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, Ca.
Default

Isn't the only issue power to weight ratio?
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 04:18 PM
  #35  
EdgeOfSanity's Avatar
EdgeOfSanity
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,101
Likes: 1
From: Breckenridge, Co
Default

Originally Posted by The Brickyard Rat
Isn't the only issue power to weight ratio?
for the most part, other than when the power comes on in the power band.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 04:27 PM
  #36  
ROGUELITE's Avatar
ROGUELITE
the Zbler eLf
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 999
Likes: 1
From: Ashburn, VA
Default

yeah it's always funny when you talk to someone who knows just enough
about cars to be completely ignorant. for example, when they think since
their car has more hp it will be faster than your car. seems like power vs
weight would be an obvious concept... but it alludes most.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 04:47 PM
  #37  
MulhollandDrive's Avatar
MulhollandDrive
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Medford, OR
Default

Originally Posted by FormulaRX
uh you sure about that??? look at Honda's lines of VTEC engines...they're 4-cyl but they make high HP because of their ability to rev high, but they don't make much torque on the bottom end. An engine with more cylinders should deliver more torque or at least a more usable/braoder torque curve because the cylinders are firing at less than every 180 degree intervals (120 degree for a 6 cylinder) compared to a 4-cyl where each power stroke occurs at every 180 degree rotation of the crank shaft. This is why you would need to rev a 4-cyl higher to generate the same amount of torque that a V6 would make at a slightly lower RPM.
Smaller displacement motors can rev much higher than large displacement motors so that motorcycle motors rev crazy high. Single cylinder motors make mucho torque but cannot rev as high as multi cylinder motors of the same displacement.

http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/school-SectionSix.htm
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 04:55 PM
  #38  
FormulaRX's Avatar
FormulaRX
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 170
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
Default

Originally Posted by MulhollandDrive
Smaller displacement motors can rev much higher than large displacement motors so that motorcycle motors rev crazy high. Single cylinder motors make mucho torque but cannot rev as high as multi cylinder motors of the same displacement.

http://www.totalmotorcycle.com/school-SectionSix.htm

right, because the more cylinders an engine has, the less it's volume per cylinder and hence the less it's stroke which allows it to rev faster since piston travel distance is not as long as if it was a single cylinder engine of the SAME displacement.

This is probably the reason why big rigs, fire trucks, and busses use big displacement (10-12 liters???) inline 6 cylinder deisel engines as opposed to say a V12 of the same displacement since the 6 cyl would have a longer stroke per piston giving it more low end torque than a 12 cyl. It won't rev as high and won't make much hp but in these applications hp is not as important as towing power.

Last edited by FormulaRX; Jul 10, 2005 at 04:58 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 05:57 PM
  #39  
MulhollandDrive's Avatar
MulhollandDrive
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 434
Likes: 0
From: Medford, OR
Default

I said: For a given design and SIZE, the engine with more cylinders generally delivers more horsepower and the engine with fewer cylinders generally delivers more torque.

You said:
Originally Posted by FormulaRX
right, because the more cylinders an engine has, the less it's volume per cylinder and hence the less it's stroke which allows it to rev faster since piston travel distance is not as long as if it was a single cylinder engine of the SAME displacement.

This is probably the reason why big rigs, fire trucks, and busses use big displacement (10-12 liters???) inline 6 cylinder deisel engines as opposed to say a V12 of the same displacement since the 6 cyl would have a longer stroke per piston giving it more low end torque than a 12 cyl. It won't rev as high and won't make much hp but in these applications hp is not as important as towing power.
I think you are agreeing with me, but I could be wrong
Reply
Old Jul 10, 2005 | 06:34 PM
  #40  
g1hwang's Avatar
g1hwang
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 76
Likes: 0
From: walnut
Default

tacoma runs 1/4 low 16's and traps 85-87. Z runs 1/4 mid 13's to low 14's and trap 100-103. not even close.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:03 AM.