Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

C&D testers are bad drivers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-26-2002, 09:26 PM
  #1  
max2000jp
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
max2000jp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default C&D testers are bad drivers

I wanna know how C&D got 14.1 out of the new Z. Come on, guys are running 14.2-14.4 with a FWD 6 speed Maxima STOCK. I am willing to bet that with a good driver with some seat time and a broken in engine the 350Z will be good for at least 13.7. I am planning on trading my 2000 Maxima in next summer for a 350Z Track, so I better see some good times by then


FYI....I dont know if this aplies to the 350Z, but on the 3.5VQ in the Maxima a HAI intake is good for 10 FWHP. Also, I would think that the Maxima UR UDP would also fit the 350Z. With those 2 cheap mods the 350Z should be pushin 300 Crank HP.
Old 06-26-2002, 09:33 PM
  #2  
Shalashaska
Registered User
 
Shalashaska's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Posts: 43
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Also given that it was a pre-production car, maybe they were given certain constraints from Nissan so as to not break it. Given this maybe they didn't run it as hard as they could have. I dunno, just a thought.
Old 06-26-2002, 09:35 PM
  #3  
max2000jp
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
max2000jp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,551
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Shalashaska
Also given that it was a pre-production car, maybe they were given certain constraints from Nissan so as to not break it. Given this maybe they didn't run it as hard as they could have. I dunno, just a thought.
The number that looks promising is the 101 mph trap speed, which indicates a high 13s car. I know that VQ's get stronger as they get miles put on.
Old 06-26-2002, 09:43 PM
  #4  
BILZ Z
Registered User
 
BILZ Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bay Village OH
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If they're bad drivers, maybe they hired Bronxwarrior to test the car for them. He's just trying to get the best of us for dumping his *** out of my350Z.com.
Old 06-26-2002, 09:58 PM
  #5  
Dave
Registered User
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Toronto, CANADA
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Car and Drivers writers are the ones that actually test the cars, not any special test-drivers. I say they should stick to writing. They initially gave the S2000 a 1/4 mile time of 15.1 in august 99, then they eventually changed it to 14.4 and 1/2 of the other magazines out there are reporting 13.9-14.2 now adays. It puts things in perspective for you.

I still believe the 350Z will be a high 13s car, based on the trap speed alone, the 95 LT1 Camaro pretty much had the same specs (weight/horsepower..) as the 350Z and it ran about a 13.6

You can take that to the bank.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lapham3
Maintenance & Repair
8
10-07-2022 03:15 PM
Gruppe-S
Body Interior
13
05-16-2016 10:42 PM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
04-04-2016 07:52 AM



Quick Reply: C&D testers are bad drivers



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:30 PM.