Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

What Octane Gas are you using?

Old Aug 22, 2005 | 04:26 AM
  #21  
TommyBoy76's Avatar
TommyBoy76
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
From: Toronto
Default

94 ultra at Sunoco......
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 04:36 AM
  #22  
Go Speed Ricer's Avatar
Go Speed Ricer
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
From: Virginia Tech
Default

Those shows are somewhat generalized to the average driver who drives a sedan or minivan auto where the engine barely even ever meets redline unless your a Schumacher at heart driving a 4 door. 20/20 did a piece on this with John Stossel and at the end he concluded that only sports cars and basically the Acura line of cars really need high octane so yes for our car it is justified.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 05:28 AM
  #23  
zzz350's Avatar
zzz350
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,255
Likes: 0
From: Kalifornia
Default

Just stop driving until gas prices go down, simply yet stupid.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 05:43 AM
  #24  
FCallender's Avatar
FCallender
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: CO
Default

When gas prices started to rise above two bucks I went from midgrade 87 to regular 85. I could detect no change in power, no change in mileage (a steady 26, town and country) and the engine runs just as well. I do most of my driving from 7500 to 6000 ft. so octane isn't as much of an issue.
When I first got it in 03 I did a 2200 mile round trip, most of it at midwest altitudes and almost all of it at freeway speeds. Again, I was unable to detect any significant difference in mpg or power when I tried different tankfulls (tanksfull?) of all the grades.
The experts say if it runs fine on lower octane then use it. Anything more is a waste of money.
These octane arguments always seem to revolve around a quality issue which is simply not true. Higher octane gas is not more refined or "better" in any way other than it contains more of an antiknock additive for higher compression engines. Today's engine electronics, if I recall correctly, have to pass a test of running an engine on 82 octane. Up to OBD II one could get chips that would refine that programming so that mileage and performance would improve if high octane gas was used. Less true since then.
The manual, in my opinion, is kind of vague about it and they don't say it will void the warranty.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 08:51 AM
  #25  
Barzten1's Avatar
Barzten1
Registered User
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,285
Likes: 0
From: New Mexico
Default

Originally Posted by Monsta
JP-8 w/ a lil Red Bull.








Give's it Wings.
Nice!!!!!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 08:55 AM
  #26  
MADDOG`'s Avatar
MADDOG`
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: Oregon, USA
Default

92 Chevron or Union 76 only.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 08:59 AM
  #27  
Clapton9286's Avatar
Clapton9286
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 891
Likes: 0
From: Honey Brook/Temple U
Default

Originally Posted by FCallender
When gas prices started to rise above two bucks I went from midgrade 87 to regular 85. I could detect no change in power, no change in mileage (a steady 26, town and country) and the engine runs just as well. I do most of my driving from 7500 to 6000 ft. so octane isn't as much of an issue.
When I first got it in 03 I did a 2200 mile round trip, most of it at midwest altitudes and almost all of it at freeway speeds. Again, I was unable to detect any significant difference in mpg or power when I tried different tankfulls (tanksfull?) of all the grades.
The experts say if it runs fine on lower octane then use it. Anything more is a waste of money.
These octane arguments always seem to revolve around a quality issue which is simply not true. Higher octane gas is not more refined or "better" in any way other than it contains more of an antiknock additive for higher compression engines. Today's engine electronics, if I recall correctly, have to pass a test of running an engine on 82 octane. Up to OBD II one could get chips that would refine that programming so that mileage and performance would improve if high octane gas was used. Less true since then.
The manual, in my opinion, is kind of vague about it and they don't say it will void the warranty.
How in the heck do you get 26?! The highest mine has read was 19.3..it averages around 18.6...
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 09:54 AM
  #28  
hypeiv's Avatar
hypeiv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,942
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

my old 626 recommended 91+ but my dad put 87 in once and the mileage and performance sucked. I don't care to try that again with my Z. In reality I would only save like $10 a month if I went from 93 to 87.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 12:33 PM
  #29  
BRZ3303's Avatar
BRZ3303
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 199
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

Sunoco Ultra 94
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 04:55 PM
  #30  
mikedZ33's Avatar
mikedZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Default

Nothing less than 93. If you want to pinch pennies sell your Z and buy a Honda Insight.

With lower octane gas the ecu will retard the ignition timing and increase your chance of knock. For a sports car like the Z paying the price of high octane gas is a must IMHO.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 05:00 PM
  #31  
The Brickyard Rat's Avatar
The Brickyard Rat
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, Ca.
Default

It looks like folks in the East can get "93"; best we can do in Cali is "91".

If "93" is tops in the East, what is the octane of the next highest grade?
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 05:05 PM
  #32  
mikedZ33's Avatar
mikedZ33
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Indy
Default

Originally Posted by The Brickyard Rat
It looks like folks in the East can get "93"; best we can do in Cali is "91".

If "93" is tops in the East, what is the octane of the next highest grade?
Yeah I don't get why the West doesn't offer 93. Most places in Indiana have 93, 91, and 87 octanes.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 06:03 PM
  #33  
platinum350's Avatar
platinum350
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 579
Likes: 0
From: Phila, PA (DE County)
Default

A local gas station offers 100 octane at the pump...
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 06:43 PM
  #34  
PrimeX's Avatar
PrimeX
Registered User
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 801
Likes: 0
From: Houston (Midtown)
Default

91-93 Octane at all times, and if they offered 100 Octane here I'd be filling her veins with that. Nothing but the best available for my *****, regardless of the extra dimes.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 07:05 PM
  #35  
Ztrackman's Avatar
Ztrackman
New Member
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 100
Likes: 1
From: Southern California
Default

100 octane Union 76 in Cali was $6.41 per gallon last weekend! What they call premium here, 91 octane, is about $3.00 per gallon. Tough to run 100 all the time!
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 07:37 PM
  #36  
lane myers's Avatar
lane myers
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,194
Likes: 0
From: the kid from greendale
Default

Originally Posted by platinum350
Well, with gas prices getting so high I have to find out if it is really necesary to use 93+ octane gas. I heard about some News study that revealed that it's not really any better. My Z is stock w/ the exception of an JWT pop charger.
So I was curious what you guys are running.
im sure this study wasnt focused on higher-than-average cars and was focused more on minvans and late model suv's... you bought a sportscar, everything about it is more expensive than the "normal" daily driver.

...besides i think the engineers at nissan understand the effects of premium fuel on your sportscar more than the news study does, imo.

i only use 93.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 07:40 PM
  #37  
domenic's Avatar
domenic
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: /
Default

Originally Posted by CervanteZ
Still and no matter how high it gets, it will always be Chevron Premium. Nothing's too good for "chata" (my Z).

i've been saying the same thing for the past 6 years i've owned my cars...
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 08:39 PM
  #38  
CorruptedZ's Avatar
CorruptedZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: montreal
Default

The z requires 91 octane. anything less is no good, anything better shouldn't make a difference but it won't hurt the car thats for sure.

I don't know how the z handles below 91 oct. I do know that bmw's have a sensor and will cut the power accordingly to match the lower grade fuel. I'm assuming the z has the same system.

Either way no matter what, don't put less than 91 oct. 3~6 extra $ won't kill you so don't risk damagin your engine for it.
Reply
Old Aug 22, 2005 | 09:03 PM
  #39  
AZZGUY's Avatar
AZZGUY
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 512
Likes: 0
From: Scottsdale, AZ
Talking Only the best for my baby!

[B]91 here - that's what the book says. Oil and gas are cheaper than replacing engines. Do you know they recommend 10-40 oil also??
Reply
Old Aug 23, 2005 | 06:26 AM
  #40  
jclayton's Avatar
jclayton
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 85
Likes: 1
From: Central Florida
Default

Originally Posted by The Brickyard Rat
It looks like folks in the East can get "93"; best we can do in Cali is "91".

If "93" is tops in the East, what is the octane of the next highest grade?
Rat in my area of Florida 93 then 89 is next and then 87.
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:17 AM.