I also got 5.731 at the track with my sock Z

 

I mean stock z

 

False, I ran a 12.9 @ 99 MPH in my SRT-4 when I was on slicks and had only three mods which were Mopar Stage 1 Springs, AGP Wastegate Actuator, and K&N Drop-In Filter. You dont need to go past 105 to get a 12.9 ET

 

yah but thats only if the car is for say awd OR turbo cause you can get a really quick 60's and then die off later on and still get that kind of speed.. but on an na.. it'll be really hard...

if you get like 13 and trap under 100.. thats a good car from light to light.. but would get a beating on the highway by a lot of cars...

 

That 5at Ran O-60 Seconds!!!!!!!!!!

 

5.73 with my Chevro legs

 

I ran 6.11 WITHOUT the tiptronics prolly get high 5s with it.

edit: 6.11 1st try without much effort.

 

Cannysage..checked out your pix...pretty sweet!!!

 

Thanks bro, that means a lot to me

 

What are you talking about. He posted his times are faster in his MT. What is there for a MT owner to get upset about? I think it's funny how AT 'tards are always so quick to cry foul before there ever even is one. The AT is slower. Period.

Since when do turbos die off? Very interesting.

 

hawtness......

 

I think he was speaking from experience in the forum in the past. And I think your later comment proved his point. Congratulation on becoming a statistic.

 

So you drive an automatic. Congratulations to you too.

 

And before another illiterate person misinterprets my post, I was not referring to auto owners as tards. I was referring to the ones who get their panties in a wad when you point out the facts. In this case the guy started the argument before there even was one. How classic is that. I have a good friend who drives an auto Z. Guess who smokes who?

 

LOL, keep it up, you are acting just the way the OP expected you to act like. Look who turns out to be the "classic".

 

GUrrr duurrrr ber what?