Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

!!Greedy TT HP Claims Backed Down To REALITY!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 08:07 AM
  #1  
dc350z's Avatar
dc350z
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, California
Cool !!Greedy TT HP Claims Backed Down To REALITY!!

Don't want to start a war of arguments, just want to report what I saw at the LA Show last night.
Remember the outlandish power figures they were quoting for the car, with all the boost they were running on a 10.3 baseline compression ratio?

Well, it's no more.
The car on display had a window sticker listing all the features and the power gains.
The motor now only puts out 345HP, because they are only quoting 5.7PSI of boost. Sounds like they came to their senses on what you can do with stock compression.

Personally, to pay all that money for all that hardware and increased weight and only gain that, seems pretty stupid to me.

The car was on display downstairs, below the main floor, where all the vendors and accessory guys are.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 08:23 AM
  #2  
Gendo Ikari's Avatar
Gendo Ikari
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 183
Likes: 0
From: Fairfax, VA
Default

345 to the wheels...thats almost 100more than stock. I think it is worth it.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 08:41 AM
  #3  
dc350z's Avatar
dc350z
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: Long Beach, California
Cool No, not to the wheels.

It was the engine HP at the crank. Makes sense for 5.7PSI
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 08:45 AM
  #4  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

hmmm so about 60hp... yeah that is rough. have to see how power enterprises is, otherwise good thing theres a quality shop in the area that speciallizes in nissans. have to go with a custom turbo and toss in low compression pistons while Im there.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 09:18 AM
  #5  
PeelBoy's Avatar
PeelBoy
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas, USA
Default

Originally posted by ares
hmmm so about 60hp... yeah that is rough. have to see how power enterprises is, otherwise good thing theres a quality shop in the area that speciallizes in nissans. have to go with a custom turbo and toss in low compression pistons while Im there.
Don't forget the exhaust.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 09:25 AM
  #6  
PeelBoy's Avatar
PeelBoy
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Texas, USA
Default

60 to 80hp sounds about right with stock compression. I was expecting it to be closer towards 80hp though

It would be nice to see what it looks like on a dyno to see how much it raises the powerband throughout the rpm range.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 10:12 AM
  #8  
Apexi350z's Avatar
Apexi350z
Charter Member #50
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

60hp gain for twin turbo? give me a break...

NOS, here I come
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 10:26 AM
  #9  
ColecatZ's Avatar
ColecatZ
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,460
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, Tx
Default

Hard to believe that they would develop the kit on the car and then turn around and pull it all out to do a crank dyno.


I would have taken the window sticker to be at the wheels.....for only 60 hp why not go with the less expensive supercharger route. Now....100-125+ that would be a different story.

They'll easily push 5.7 psi
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 10:26 AM
  #10  
Alang's Avatar
Alang
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

I talked to the owner of a shop in LA that works with imports and nissans a lot. He is actually working with Nissan doing R&D on head work for the 350 and also development of a street cam. His initial though based on his work with other Nissan motors was that there would be 50 to 60 whp from head work, and a good set of street cams.

Personally, I think this sounds too good to be true, but he sounded very confident since he was basing these numbers on previous work he has done with VQ motors.

The only reason I bring it up is that the increase is close to the numbers stated above, but his very gross estimate of the cost would be around $800 + install. He is planning on having real numbers in about 60 days. I will be sure to pass them along, and if he really does as well as he thinks he will, this sounds like a much more cost effective route.

The waiting is the hardest part.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 10:28 AM
  #11  
SKiDaZZLe's Avatar
SKiDaZZLe
Charter Member #34
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,228
Likes: 0
From: -
Default

this 345 might be where they are now... they have not upgraded the ECU, right? have they confirmed they are done with R&D on that Z kit?

m
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 11:10 AM
  #12  
Monkey Man's Avatar
Monkey Man
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 274
Likes: 0
From: Ky
Default

They are nowhere near completion yet. Right now, they are still having issues with the fuel maps. As expected, this will be the hardest part. They also have an exhaust system in development, just for this kit. Rumor is, it could be a true dual exhaust. Don't expect to see the full potential of this kit till later this summer.

-Jeremy
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 11:26 AM
  #13  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

I do remember they were still trying for 400hp, which is over 100hp even if its at the crank. so we'll see what they manage.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 02:38 PM
  #14  
fdao's Avatar
fdao
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Default

Alang,

Keep us posted. 50-60 hp gain is quite impressive with just head work and cams. I wouldn't mind going this route if the expectations are achieved at that kind of price with reliability as well.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 03:16 PM
  #15  
TCL's Avatar
TCL
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 766
Likes: 0
From: Northern Virginia
Default

Originally posted by Alang
I talked to the owner of a shop in LA that works with imports and nissans a lot. He is actually working with Nissan doing R&D on head work for the 350 and also development of a street cam.
Is he working with the NISMO division
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 05:37 PM
  #16  
speedtrip's Avatar
speedtrip
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Boise, ID
Default Re: !!Greedy TT HP Claims Backed Down To REALITY!!

Originally posted by dc350z
Well, it's no more.
The car on display had a window sticker listing all the features and the power gains.
The motor now only puts out 345HP, because they are only quoting 5.7PSI of boost. Sounds like they came to their senses on what you can do with stock compression.
Something fishy is going on. Assuming a 15% drivetrain loss 345 crank hp is 293 rwhp. To gain 50-60 hp with a turbo is laughable! I can buy a turbo kit for my 97 maxima run 9psi safely and be around 350 front wheel hp. Now considering a stock 5-spd max dynoes in the low to mid 160's I can almost double my hp with a turbo. This can't be right.

Turbo max dyno #'s
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 07:29 PM
  #17  
Traffic's Avatar
Traffic
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default Re: !!Greedy TT HP Claims Backed Down To REALITY!!

Originally posted by dc350z
Don't want to start a war of arguments, just want to report what I saw at the LA Show last night.
Remember the outlandish power figures they were quoting for the car, with all the boost they were running on a 10.3 baseline compression ratio?

Well, it's no more.
The car on display had a window sticker listing all the features and the power gains.
The motor now only puts out 345HP, because they are only quoting 5.7PSI of boost. Sounds like they came to their senses on what you can do with stock compression.

Personally, to pay all that money for all that hardware and increased weight and only gain that, seems pretty stupid to me.

The car was on display downstairs, below the main floor, where all the vendors and accessory guys are.
You're the same guy months ago that said the entire system was a fake. Here, I pulled up your quote:

The GREEDY TURBO 350 AT SEMA IS A FAKE!!!!
It's just an intercooler in the radiator intake, that doesn't go anywhere!
There is no turbo, and no plumbing. How sad is that? Especially for a company of their level. Why even bother to show it?
LOL, did GReddy steal your girlfriend or something?

Now, they said they weren't finished tuning the kit. Why not be patient and wait until they're done designing the setup? Unless, of course, you'd like to fabricate a twin turbo system for us?
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 07:48 PM
  #18  
Alang's Avatar
Alang
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Originally posted by TCL
Is he working with the NISMO division
He just said Nissan. I'll be going back up in a few weeks for the after mods dyno runs, I'll talk to him some more about it. What I really want to talk about is if his head work would interfere with a turbo setup in the future.

From my Z32 TT days, I remember some really impressive HP numbers from relativly low boost when a combination of bigger turbos, head work and upper and lower intake plenum work. This combination might just be the way to deal with the high compression VQ and turbos. Don't increase the boost, but increase the flow.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 08:20 PM
  #19  
TJZ's Avatar
TJZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 806
Likes: 1
From: Gainesville, Florida
Default

why the hell would they bother to measure the HP at the crank. I find this HIGHLY doubtful. I think it's MUCH more likely if they numbers are at the wheels.
Reply
Old Jan 10, 2003 | 08:45 PM
  #20  
NissaNZ's Avatar
NissaNZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

I don't wanna sound like an *** but I think he's full of ****. Just got back from the LA Auto Show, the window sticker just listed the parts that were installed there was no mention of any horsepower. I tried asking one of the guys around the car and they didn't know for sure.
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:08 PM.