Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

how much faster is the 350Z track compared to the base?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2003 | 11:22 PM
  #1  
krazE's Avatar
krazE
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
From: CA
Default how much faster is the 350Z track compared to the base?

anyone?
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 03:04 AM
  #2  
tbcz's Avatar
tbcz
New Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,644
Likes: 0
From: Philly burbs
Default

There really hasn't been any evidence that there is any difference between the models. If there is, it's probably very small.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 03:05 AM
  #3  
AndyB's Avatar
AndyB
New Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default The base doesn't have the LSD

The base doesn't have the limited slip differential so it would not launch as well. (tire spin).

Other than that they should be comparable in acceleration.

In handling and braking the track model would be better due to larger rims, wider tires, and better brakes.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 04:57 AM
  #4  
j's350z's Avatar
j's350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Default

Although the base doesn't have a limited slip, it is the lightest model. I have already ran a 13.90 with my base and I think I can get 2 tenths better with a couple of more runs......
Jason
NJ
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 06:26 AM
  #5  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

base is the lightest, by about 50lbs I think... if you believe nissans claims anyway.

but the LSD and narrow tires are gonna limit the times. I think you'll find 60 foot times to vary between the models, and that will translate to a win.

of course, it is the same car, the driver could over come any handicap it might have.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 07:14 AM
  #6  
Zaphod 350z's Avatar
Zaphod 350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

I've explained this before, I'll do it again. The 50 pound curb weight difference between the base and the track is negated by the weight of the wheels.

Rotating parts of the drivetrain have different weight characteristics known as "rotational mass". Wheels, pulley, etc. Rotational mass equates to 10x's curb weight. Every 10lbs of rotational mass = 100lbs of curb weight.

That being said, let's look at the wheel set up on the base and the track. Nissan used the ray's wheels on the track for a reason. Searches have yeilded the following approximations for wheel weight. Base 17's = 24lbs each, Track 18's = 18lbs each. The math...

24 - 18 = 6 (difference in weight per wheel) 6 x 4 = 24 (total weight difference in wheels) 24 x 10 = 240 (curb weight equated to rotational mass) 240 - 50 = 190 (rotational mass minus base curb weight advantage)

So after performance based mathematics, the Track has a 190lbs weight advantage. Which basically means times will depend more on the driver, but with the same driver and conditions in each car, the track will yield slightly better times.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 07:14 AM
  #7  
Jewelz350's Avatar
Jewelz350
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 290
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

Actually the Track is 37lbs heavier according to Nissan. Base weighs 3188 and the track weighs 3225.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 07:36 AM
  #8  
Them Bones's Avatar
Them Bones
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default Are you sure?

Originally posted by Zaphod 350z
I've explained this before, I'll do it again. The 50 pound curb weight difference between the base and the track is negated by the weight of the wheels.

Rotating parts of the drivetrain have different weight characteristics known as "rotational mass". Wheels, pulley, etc. Rotational mass equates to 10x's curb weight. Every 10lbs of rotational mass = 100lbs of curb weight.

That being said, let's look at the wheel set up on the base and the track. Nissan used the ray's wheels on the track for a reason. Searches have yeilded the following approximations for wheel weight. Base 17's = 24lbs each, Track 18's = 18lbs each. The math...

24 - 18 = 6 (difference in weight per wheel) 6 x 4 = 24 (total weight difference in wheels) 24 x 10 = 240 (curb weight equated to rotational mass) 240 - 50 = 190 (rotational mass minus base curb weight advantage)

So after performance based mathematics, the Track has a 190lbs weight advantage. Which basically means times will depend more on the driver, but with the same driver and conditions in each car, the track will yield slightly better times.

I think you missed the fact that the brake rotors are heavier on the track model. That should at least make up for the lighter wheels. Also, the tires are probably a little heavier than the base model's.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 07:44 AM
  #9  
theblue's Avatar
theblue
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
From: Rochester NY
Default

also don't forget that most of the weight of a rim is on the outside... so a 17 inch rim that weights 20lbs. is BETTER than a 18 inch rim that also weights 20lbs.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 07:51 AM
  #10  
Zaphod 350z's Avatar
Zaphod 350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Originally posted by theblue
also don't forget that most of the weight of a rim is on the outside... so a 17 inch rim that weights 20lbs. is BETTER than a 18 inch rim that also weights 20lbs.
The weight encumberance in rotational mass is derivetted from the spinning of object. Doesn't really matter where the lip is, the weight will inevitably be focused at the hub.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 07:55 AM
  #11  
WayneTN's Avatar
WayneTN
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
From: TennessZee
Default

Originally posted by Zaphod 350z
Rotating parts of the drivetrain have different weight characteristics known as "rotational mass". Wheels, pulley, etc. Rotational mass equates to 10x's curb weight. Every 10lbs of rotational mass = 100lbs of curb weight.
I see what you are saying, but you can't just assume that a pound of rotational mass anywhere on the car is equal to 10 lbs. of dead weight. That may be a "rule of thumb" that you've heard somewhere, but you would actually have to consider what's called the "mass moment of intertia" or, in common terms, the measure of resistance to rotational motion. That's why it's a good idea to make big wheels light, like on the Track.

Anyway, everyone gets the idea.
WayneTN
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 07:58 AM
  #12  
Zaphod 350z's Avatar
Zaphod 350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

I agree. Without getting into to much technical detail, the point is, the 37 lbs curb weight difference on the base is not going to DEFINITELY equate to faster times. Nor will the advantages of the track always yield better times. Again, it's about driver, it's about conditions.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 08:00 AM
  #13  
WayneTN's Avatar
WayneTN
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,293
Likes: 0
From: TennessZee
Default

Originally posted by Zaphod 350z
The weight encumberance in rotational mass is derivetted from the spinning of object. Doesn't really matter where the lip is
Sure it does! That's why a spinning ice skater revolves faster when they pull their arms in. For wheels that weigh the same, it would be better to not have that weight on the rim. It would take less power to get the wheel rotating quicker.

WayneTN
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 08:02 AM
  #14  
Zaphod 350z's Avatar
Zaphod 350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

You are correct. I forgot my laws of inertia for a minute there.

Though I still do not believe that the 1" difference will make up for extra overall weight.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 08:04 AM
  #15  
Moodie's Avatar
Moodie
Minivan Racer
Premier Member
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,717
Likes: 0
From: Santa Clara, CA
Wink Same car guys! Driver skill is all that matters!!

Besides that 50lbs or so between the 2 cars??? Unless you are using the same driver and test both cars, the weight of the drivers may come into play. If a 150 lb driver race against a 200 lb driver, the car would weigh equal now, right?

Just a thought!
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 08:12 AM
  #16  
dkmura's Avatar
dkmura
General & DIY Moderator
MY350Z.COM
Premier Member
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
iTrader: (64)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 8,623
Likes: 1,392
From: Aurora, Colorado
Default Track model for road courses

As a track model owner, I gotta put in my $0.02. The 350Z track model was specifically designed to be faster on a road course than any of the other models. There's NO question that the braking ability and greater tire contact patch of the track model will help it to disappear into the distance as the laps unfold (assuming equal drivers, tires, etc). I've driven both the Enthusiast model and track model back-to-back on a road course and can say that they would be quite close over the course of say, a lap. Go five laps HARD and the track model would begin pulling away. Beyond ten laps, the base, enthusiast, performance and touring models will all begin to suffer extreme brake fade and will have to throttle back. Drag racing, while important, is only a portion of what this car is all about, IMO.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 08:14 AM
  #17  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

yes distance from center matters, but I think it will all just work to be somewhat equal. you could go on... oh 17" rim means more sidwall so tread weighs more... ect, there could never be a true answer.

also the rotor is not heavier I dont think, I know brembo uses a light weight design. probably equal to what the stock is, with a bigger rotor. so we'll call that a wash, unless you want to bring in the fact that its rotating mass is also farther from the center...

anyway, race em and find out, like i said, I dont think rim weight or car weight will play in, from a roll I bet its dead even, but from a launch, LSD and wider stickier(kinda...) tires will edge it out with a good launch that edges into LSD territory.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 08:21 AM
  #18  
Zaphod 350z's Avatar
Zaphod 350z
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 398
Likes: 0
From: NYC
Default

Ares, I hate these tires!! I can't wait to change them! S03's as soon spring rolls around. I had the re040's on my first S4 and when I went to the track, I spun all four wheels off the launch. These tires have me afaid to push the car. Plus the RE040's are very suseptable to bubbling.

When I change, I will probably go with at least a 255 in the rear.
Reply
Old Jan 14, 2003 | 12:13 PM
  #19  
ChinaClipper's Avatar
ChinaClipper
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 970
Likes: 2
From: Rockwall, Texas
Default brake rotor/caliper total weight

Originally posted by ares
also the rotor is not heavier I dont think, I know brembo uses a light weight design. probably equal to what the stock is, with a bigger rotor. so we'll call that a wash, unless you want to bring in the fact that its rotating mass is also farther from the center...
From an earlier thread, the total weight of the Brembo aluminum calipers and steel rotors on a Track model is 102.8 pounds. On the standard Nissan setup, the calipers and rotors weigh a total of 92.6 pounds. Difference is 10.2 pound weight disadvantage for the Track that is more than made up for by the lighter weight wheels. The other weight of a Track model is in the rear spoiler and the unique-to-Track model, diffuser/blockers under the car behind the rear wheels.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sales@czp
Suspension
54
Jan 17, 2018 09:24 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:37 PM.