Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Just out of curiosity, has anyone ever used 87 and has their Z lived to tell the tale

Old Sep 11, 2006 | 10:41 AM
  #1  
GalvatronType_R's Avatar
GalvatronType_R
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,157
Likes: 0
From: Van down by the river
Default Just out of curiosity, has anyone ever used 87 and has their Z lived to tell the tale

Let's start by saying that I am EXTREMELY picky about my Z and would never use anything less than 91 (and I would strongly advocate that others do the same).

I'm just curious as to whether the people on this forum who ask about gasoline grade have ever used 87 in their Zs and not had any engine knocking, breakdowns, engine explosions, etc.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 10:42 AM
  #2  
SpeedRcr's Avatar
SpeedRcr
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 2,385
Likes: 1
From: USA
Default

my local dealer refuels their cars with 89 octane from the pumps on site...all the cars they sell are fueled as such that they test drive as well.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #3  
efx's Avatar
efx
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

the dealer used 87 for the first 35 miles, after that I used 92. It hasnt knocked, but you can tell it was an 87 because of the exhaust sound. Id rev it at neutral a few times and you can definately hear the fuel burning inefficiently.

edit: ohh wait, couldve been an 89.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:24 AM
  #4  
BrianV's Avatar
BrianV
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

When I got mine it came with a free tank of 87. I didn't take it over 4500 rpm and never past 2/3 throttle. I also put an octane booster in after about 50 miles.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:33 AM
  #5  
efx's Avatar
efx
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by BrianV
When I got mine it came with a free tank of 87. I didn't take it over 4500 rpm and never past 2/3 throttle. I also put an octane booster in after about 50 miles.
I was thinking of adding additives to the gas tank. I just dont know exactly when to start doing it.... any pointers?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:40 AM
  #6  
bailey bill's Avatar
bailey bill
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 2
From: sims, nc
Default

Using a lower octane on a modern car with a knock sensor and dynamic closed loop timing control will not damage the engine. The ECU will simply retard timing, and possibly increase the A/F to accomodate it.

But it will definitely result in loss of performance.

bill
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:44 AM
  #7  
roast's Avatar
roast
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 1
From: Okay, see?
Default

The mods should consider making the sticky thread an open discussion instead of a one post closure. I understand, it should be a one post, "it's as simple as this", "there is nothing to talk about", "end of story", but as it is, these threads are going to keep popping up. Might as well keep it all in one thread??
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:48 AM
  #8  
Z_freak's Avatar
Z_freak
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,169
Likes: 1
From: G-vine
Default

I reccomend what the owners manual says......
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #9  
BrianV's Avatar
BrianV
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by efx
I was thinking of adding additives to the gas tank. I just dont know exactly when to start doing it.... any pointers?
I just picked one up at the auto store and since the tank was almost full I just put it in the top. Ideally, you'd probably want to put the additive in and then fill up, but if given that choice, just put 93 in since 87 + additive costs more than 93 (or 91 depending on where you live).
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 11:59 AM
  #10  
BrianV's Avatar
BrianV
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by bailey bill
Using a lower octane on a modern car with a knock sensor and dynamic closed loop timing control will not damage the engine. The ECU will simply retard timing, and possibly increase the A/F to accomodate it.

But it will definitely result in loss of performance.

bill
Some will argue that it has to sense knock to retard and by sensing knock that means it did knock and hence damage to the engine. I think that's an over-generalization and tend to think your statement is right, that the car will adjust and no damage will occur.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 12:00 PM
  #11  
BrianV's Avatar
BrianV
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

Originally Posted by Z_freak
I reccomend what the owners manual says......
Owner's manual says something like if you are forced to put lesser gas in, only put in the minimum you have to (say you know you need to go 50 miles, then only put 3 gallons in), and then at the next filling fill up with the proper unleaded gas.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 12:12 PM
  #12  
IndustrialDuane's Avatar
IndustrialDuane
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 198
Likes: 0
From: Delaware
Default

when i got my 383 in my camaro anything under 91 would make the car sputter and hesitate really bad!
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 12:16 PM
  #13  
HyperSprite's Avatar
HyperSprite
Mad Scientist
Premier Member
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 2,795
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, CA
Default

A motor build with high octane fuel in mind can only retard the timing so far before it just knocks anyway (like a diesel). On other Nissan VQ products they "Recommend High Octane for best performance" but you can run them on lower grade flue, on the Z they require it. Sure maybe if you are driving in Kansas on a cool fall day, you can get away with it on the other hand, on a hot day, under load, it's a bad idea.

Also, adding octane booster to 87 wont even get you 89.

Chris
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 01:01 PM
  #14  
Fletch69z's Avatar
Fletch69z
Registered User
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: Indiana
Default

The dealership put regular in mine when I first bought it and it never knocked. It just runs less aggressive maps to adjust and keep from knocking. Not good for performance but it will run on 87. I don't put anything but premium in though because I want to take care of my baby, .
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 01:09 PM
  #15  
efx's Avatar
efx
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,045
Likes: 0
From: WA
Default

Originally Posted by BrianV
I just picked one up at the auto store and since the tank was almost full I just put it in the top. Ideally, you'd probably want to put the additive in and then fill up, but if given that choice, just put 93 in since 87 + additive costs more than 93 (or 91 depending on where you live).

But when (at what mileage) should I put additives to the gasoline.
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 02:36 PM
  #16  
bailey bill's Avatar
bailey bill
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 2
From: sims, nc
Default

Originally Posted by BrianV
Some will argue that it has to sense knock to retard and by sensing knock that means it did knock and hence damage to the engine. I think that's an over-generalization and tend to think your statement is right, that the car will adjust and no damage will occur.
A modern knock response system will sense potential knock, and take corrective action, long before it can cause any damage.

These systems are actually designed to keep the ignition curve near the knock limit, as this is where the engine can safey make max power, and operate at max efficiency.

bill
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 02:48 PM
  #17  
GFrnk69's Avatar
GFrnk69
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 807
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

https://my350z.com/forum/showthread.php?t=188064

doesnt hurt to search
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 02:50 PM
  #18  
finallyaZdriver's Avatar
finallyaZdriver
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta, GA
Default

Putting 87 in might not be what the manual says to do, but your engine isn't going to explode....that doesn't even make sense. I cheaped out on a couple tanks when I first bought the car, but I decided that I was just being stupid by not wanting to pay an extra $3 for a car I just paid thousands of dollars for (or signed a piece of paper to that effect rather). The only difference is that 93 feels a lot more powerful than 87. I'm sure over a long period of time using 87 is not a good idea, but why cheap out a couple dollars?
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 02:52 PM
  #19  
Wired 24/7's Avatar
Wired 24/7
Dr. Wired
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 17,582
Likes: 9
From: San Mateo, CA
Default

ECU will pull timing and everything will be fine.

Your performance will suck.

you will need to reset your ECU once you put in some 91+ again

NOT recommended for turbo guys (if you're F/I and reading this and didn't know this then )
Reply
Old Sep 11, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #20  
TK2005's Avatar
TK2005
New Member
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 5,961
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
Default

Originally Posted by efx
the dealer used 87 for the first 35 miles, after that I used 92. It hasnt knocked, but you can tell it was an 87 because of the exhaust sound. Id rev it at neutral a few times and you can definately hear the fuel burning inefficiently.

edit: ohh wait, couldve been an 89.
LOL
Reply

Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:43 PM.