performance figures???
07-16-2002, 09:35 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: montevallo, Alabama
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
performance figures???
Hi everyone.
Does anyone has numbers?
Top speed
0-60mph (not the quote from nissan in less than 6 secs :-)
etc
A nissan sales person called me today, they are offering a 3.9% rate on the car for 60 months. ANyone got something better?
One more week to decide on the 350z.
Damn, the car is so good looking and CHEAP.
If I buy one it will be the standard coupe 6 spd with burgundy or silver exterior.
Gio.
Does anyone has numbers?
Top speed
0-60mph (not the quote from nissan in less than 6 secs :-)
etc
A nissan sales person called me today, they are offering a 3.9% rate on the car for 60 months. ANyone got something better?
One more week to decide on the 350z.
Damn, the car is so good looking and CHEAP.
If I buy one it will be the standard coupe 6 spd with burgundy or silver exterior.
Gio.
07-16-2002, 09:44 PM
#3
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: maryland
Posts: 2,572
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
so far we only have one damn test. It's from Car and driver and you can find it on the news stand now. The review on the C&D web site does not give all the stats.
The numbers are quite good, but many think we will see better numbers when more tests are done such as motor trend or road and track.
0-60 5.4 sec 1/4 mine at 14.1 @ 101 mph top speed was 156mph. it appears that all of the acceleration numbers up to 140 mph are the same or very close to the Boxster S (a car that costs $55-65K). Also the numbers are quite close to the S2000 that is a better comparison as it costs just $32K.
For the price it a very fast car and good looking too.
The numbers are quite good, but many think we will see better numbers when more tests are done such as motor trend or road and track.
0-60 5.4 sec 1/4 mine at 14.1 @ 101 mph top speed was 156mph. it appears that all of the acceleration numbers up to 140 mph are the same or very close to the Boxster S (a car that costs $55-65K). Also the numbers are quite close to the S2000 that is a better comparison as it costs just $32K.
For the price it a very fast car and good looking too.
07-16-2002, 10:04 PM
#4
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The numbers are very close to the S2000. It will be fun to see some comparo's in the coming months.
I can't wait for my roommate to get a Z so that we can go out and run some "tests"
Steve
I can't wait for my roommate to get a Z so that we can go out and run some "tests"
Steve
07-17-2002, 01:10 AM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Richmond, Canada
Posts: 717
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by wake88
The numbers are very close to the S2000. It will be fun to see some comparo's in the coming months.
I can't wait for my roommate to get a Z so that we can go out and run some "tests"
Steve
The numbers are very close to the S2000. It will be fun to see some comparo's in the coming months.
I can't wait for my roommate to get a Z so that we can go out and run some "tests"
Steve
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post