Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Weight Myth

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-08-2006, 09:24 AM
  #41  
dutchboy350Z
Finally some go
iTrader: (5)
 
dutchboy350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZlleH
Sure, if that makes the fact feel better for you, I really don't care. People can come up with any excuse they want. Theories about Nissan using a different weighing machine, weighing with gas one year and weighing without gas another year. Weighing it in different climates. Weighing the car with a driver one year, and no driver another year.
Do you have any proof other than 2nd hand "facts"?

My Mid-A members DID weigh their cars at a Track day event @ MIR and one our member's Stock 2006 model weighed 3230 lbs.
Old 12-08-2006, 09:36 AM
  #42  
350zQ45a
Registered User
 
350zQ45a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dutchboy350Z
Do you have any proof other than 2nd hand "facts"?

My Mid-A members DID weigh their cars at a Track day event @ MIR and one our member's Stock 2006 model weighed 3230 lbs.


I agree. I don't understand why some continue to ignore all the evidence presented by members here, in favor of anecdotes


It's not just one person doing the weighing, but I haven't seen anyone able to confirm this supposed increase.
Old 12-08-2006, 09:37 AM
  #43  
97supratt
Registered User
iTrader: (61)
 
97supratt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Glendale California
Posts: 5,034
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

We're all the same damnit!!!
Old 12-08-2006, 09:56 AM
  #44  
dutchboy350Z
Finally some go
iTrader: (5)
 
dutchboy350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 350zQ45a
I agree. I don't understand why some continue to ignore all the evidence presented by members here, in favor of anecdotes


It's not just one person doing the weighing, but I haven't seen anyone able to confirm this supposed increase.
I know it's not like there weren't 20+ people at this MIR track Event to verify these weights. Alberto, DavidV, MDRacer76, and a bunch of other my350Z members were there.

I actually thought this whole weight mix up was resolved months ago.
Old 12-08-2006, 10:07 AM
  #45  
roast
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
roast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Okay, see?
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by 97supratt
We're all the same damnit!!!
it depends on how you look at it.... not very many Z's are the same weight if you ask me... there are all kinds of added features you can get with the exact same year/model that will affect weight.... aero-kits, splash guards, kick panels, floor mats, navigation, side airbags.... etc... and there can be changes year to year that affect things as well... added reinforcements... added standard features.... changes in tire sizes...etc etc...

The trick is to forget theoretical he said she said nissan said bs. Weigh your car, don't worry about the next person or what the magazine says, and go from there.... then there is nothing to debate or fight over.

My '04 base weighs 3300lbs (+/- 5lbs) with me in it (170lbs) and 1/4 tank of gas. I have splash guards, kick panels, aero kit, front floor mats, no spare/tools, and a mostly stripped rear interior.

People compile or list all these weights....and without all the details they are just meaningless numbers as far as I'm concerned. Then you have the people who lie/cheat/steal just to muck up the water and what's the point? Who cares anyway?
Old 12-08-2006, 10:10 AM
  #46  
dutchboy350Z
Finally some go
iTrader: (5)
 
dutchboy350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Here's a perfect example of misinformation. This reviewer has no clue what he's talking about.

First he claims that the 2006 Z weighs 3400 lbs. Then he states the 2006 Zs redline is 6250 rpm?

Last time I checked it was 7000 rpm. The jackass probably also thinks the red light flashing is permanently fixed @ 6,250 rpms.

Originally Posted by John Stein / autoMedia.com
Under-hood lives a smooth 3.5-liter DOHC all-aluminum V6 twisting out 300 hp at 6,400 rpm. Given the 350Z's 3,400-lb. curb weight, that's a weight-to-power ratio of 11.3:1—in the same league as the sporty Porsche Boxster S and Subaru WRX STI. Its 260 lb.-ft. of torque arrives at 4,800 rpm, but thanks to CVTCS, Nissan's continuously variable valve-timing system, the powerband is actually very flexible, pulling well down low as well as screaming to its 6,250-rpm redline, where a red light flashes a warning.
http://www.automedia.com/2006/Nissan...t20060601nz/1/
Old 12-08-2006, 10:14 AM
  #47  
roast
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
roast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Okay, see?
Posts: 4,092
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

LOL.... makes 300hp at 6400RPM, but redline is at 6250.... how unfortunate... nice find...
Old 12-08-2006, 10:33 AM
  #48  
dutchboy350Z
Finally some go
iTrader: (5)
 
dutchboy350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by roast
LOL.... makes 300hp at 6400RPM, but redline is at 6250.... how unfortunate... nice find...
The sad thing is he has nothing but good things to say about the Z, but since he's a imbecile the compliments don't really mean much.
Old 12-08-2006, 10:41 AM
  #49  
ZlleH
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
ZlleH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I never said what I posted are proofs, somebody asked if anyone happened to have data from Nissan 2005 weight so they can compare to 2006 Nissan weight.

I happened to have saved the 2005 track and touring data I collected from The Nissan website and posted a reply.

I then stated how and where I got the data and that I didn't care what outcome people will conclude from it. People can conclude that the 2006 can weigh LESS then the 2005 for all I care.


If you choose to doubt Nissan's own published data then good for you, I can accept that. Whatever floats your boat.

Originally Posted by dutchboy350Z
Do you have any proof other than 2nd hand "facts"?

My Mid-A members DID weigh their cars at a Track day event @ MIR and one our member's Stock 2006 model weighed 3230 lbs.
Old 12-08-2006, 10:55 AM
  #50  
dutchboy350Z
Finally some go
iTrader: (5)
 
dutchboy350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZlleH
I never said what I posted are proofs, somebody asked if anyone happened to have data from Nissan 2005 weight so they can compare to 2006 Nissan weight.

I happened to have saved the 2005 track and touring data I collected from The Nissan website and posted a reply.

I then stated how and where I got the data and that I didn't care what outcome people will conclude from it. People can conclude that the 2006 can weigh LESS then the 2005 for all I care.


If you choose to doubt Nissan's own published data then good for you, I can accept that. Whatever floats your boat.
Here's a suggestion try finding facts on your own (weigh your own car)instead of reading 2nd hand info--even if it's from the factory specs. Believe it or not Nissan any and other car manufacturer are not always accurate when it comes to listing their specifications.

Last edited by dutchboy350Z; 12-08-2006 at 01:31 PM.
Old 12-08-2006, 01:50 PM
  #51  
ZlleH
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
ZlleH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 4,589
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Yes sir! Next time I go and research on what trim of car to buy, I will definitely go out and weigh those trims I'm interested in buying myself. How ridiculous of me to go directly to Nissan's website for the facts, um, sorry, for Nissan's lies. I also humbly apologize to the person that asked for the previous year's weight information from Nissan. Sorry if the lies offended.

Forgive me for replying to this type of thread, I see that this issue is very sensitive to you and I will refrain myself from responding anymore with outrageous information in this thread. Good luck with your movement. I take my leave of this thread.

Originally Posted by dutchboy350Z
Here's a suggestion try finding facts on your own (weigh your own car)instead of reading 2nd hand info--even if it's from the factory specs. Believe it or not Nissan any and other car manufacturer are not always accurate when it comes to listing their specifications.
Old 12-09-2006, 07:40 AM
  #52  
dutchboy350Z
Finally some go
iTrader: (5)
 
dutchboy350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZlleH
Yes sir! Next time I go and research on what trim of car to buy, I will definitely go out and weigh those trims I'm interested in buying myself. How ridiculous of me to go directly to Nissan's website for the facts, um, sorry, for Nissan's lies. I also humbly apologize to the person that asked for the previous year's weight information from Nissan. Sorry if the lies offended.

Forgive me for replying to this type of thread, I see that this issue is very sensitive to you and I will refrain myself from responding anymore with outrageous information in this thread. Good luck with your movement. I take my leave of this thread.
Thank you come again.
Old 12-09-2006, 11:36 AM
  #53  
bailey bill
Registered User
 
bailey bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: sims, nc
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ZlleH
Yes sir! Next time I go and research on what trim of car to buy, I will definitely go out and weigh those trims I'm interested in buying myself. How ridiculous of me to go directly to Nissan's website for the facts, um, sorry, for Nissan's lies. I also humbly apologize to the person that asked for the previous year's weight information from Nissan. Sorry if the lies offended.

Forgive me for replying to this type of thread, I see that this issue is very sensitive to you and I will refrain myself from responding anymore with outrageous information in this thread. Good luck with your movement. I take my leave of this thread.
When people's minds are made up, don't try to confuse them with documentation and facts.

bill
Old 12-09-2006, 12:11 PM
  #54  
mikead_99
Registered User
iTrader: (5)
 
mikead_99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: N.VA
Posts: 500
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bailey bill
When people's minds are made up, don't try to confuse them with documentation and facts.

bill

Facts are verifiable by demonstration. It seems it's been demonstrated here that the published numbers are not factual.
Old 12-09-2006, 01:58 PM
  #55  
dutchboy350Z
Finally some go
iTrader: (5)
 
dutchboy350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bailey bill
When people's minds are made up, don't try to confuse them with documentation and facts.

bill
When people don't read the entire thread they make uninformed posts.
Old 12-09-2006, 03:23 PM
  #56  
bailey bill
Registered User
 
bailey bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: sims, nc
Posts: 1,100
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I read it all...every single post...from the beginning, right down to here.

bill
Old 12-09-2006, 03:59 PM
  #57  
350zQ45a
Registered User
 
350zQ45a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 548
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bailey bill
I read it all...every single post...from the beginning, right down to here.

bill

So all the JDM turbo cars from the 90s era only had 280 hp in Japan right?

Do you not believe the dynos of the 335 showing much more then 300 hp ?

It's been demonstrated over and over again. Why is it not capable of happening here?

Not one person who has weighed their 06 has shown the gains on paper.
Old 12-09-2006, 04:59 PM
  #58  
dutchboy350Z
Finally some go
iTrader: (5)
 
dutchboy350Z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 350zQ45a
So all the JDM turbo cars from the 90s era only had 280 hp in Japan right?

Do you not believe the dynos of the 335 showing much more then 300 hp ?

It's been demonstrated over and over again. Why is it not capable of happening here?

Not one person who has weighed their 06 has shown the gains on paper.
+1

I'd also add the LS1 and LS2s of the 90's were highly underrated as well. GM thought (and they were probably right) that if they actually listed the real hp numbers it would detract certain people from buying it because the insurance would be too high. I wish the Z had that problem.

Why do people think that if it's written on paper it must be written in stone?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sales@czp
Engine
33
09-23-2019 03:30 PM
tm9293
North East Marketplace
13
10-17-2015 09:14 PM
1973camarolt
Drivetrain
5
10-11-2015 01:26 PM
Shane86
Autocross/Road
2
09-17-2015 05:33 PM



Quick Reply: Weight Myth



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:04 AM.