Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

IZOOM article - AT preference and exhaust tuning...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 18, 2002 | 06:41 PM
  #2  
blueshift's Avatar
blueshift
Charter Member #83
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
From: Ellicott City, MD
Default

Awesome review....thanks for posting it.

For the first time I'm actually excited about choosing the Automatic


-Andrew
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2002 | 06:45 PM
  #3  
wooglin's Avatar
wooglin
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
From: Dallas, TX
Default

I haven't seen a single review without a mistake:

"The Touring model ($31,589 with manual or $33,179 with automatic) "

Umm...other way around, guys.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2002 | 06:48 PM
  #4  
EnthuZ's Avatar
EnthuZ
Banned
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,965
Likes: 1
From: Chicago Burbs
Default

Thanks for sharing!
I'd never heard of IZOOM, gotta add it to my fav's.

I don't know about the auto trans comment, but I LOVE the 200 ft. lbs.(or is that lb.ft.?) at 1200 RPM!
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2002 | 07:21 PM
  #5  
Tubbs SF's Avatar
Tubbs SF
Charter Member #85
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco
Default

I agree blueshift, first time in a while I have felt at ease with the auto tran. Though I love driving with a manual tranny, certain requests laced with underlying guilt trips made me pick the auto. Sure it helps while driving 2 mph in bay area commuting traffic, but I was worried about low end torque and a delayed response from when I hit the accelerator to power transfer to the wheels. This review gives me reason to think that my worries may be with no merit.
On a side, I went to the infiniti website to look at G35 stats since they share the same chasis design. Only available with an auto, it is listed with 0-60 time of 6.2 seconds (from motortrend). The car weighs more (i am pretty sure), has 27 less horse power, and was not meant to be a complete sports car like the Z is. If they are able to get the auto Z to run a 0 - 60 in less than 5.9 seconds I will be extremely satisfied.
The excitement, if posssible, keeps building.


Cheers,
Tubbs

Last edited by Tubbs SF; Jul 18, 2002 at 07:24 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 18, 2002 | 09:51 PM
  #7  
3rdpower's Avatar
3rdpower
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: In a Village!
Default

nice plus about the auto... too bad I could care less hehe Real sports car = manual :P (yeah so I'm opinionated - sue me!!)

Awesome article - the car didn't really blow this guy away but I think they really like the all around performance. Yeah, again, lose some weight seems to be the theme but hey... as of lately, the Z hasn't really been a light weight roadrocket - it's been a cruiser. We are not back to a solid mix of cruiser / racer IMHO.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 07:41 AM
  #9  
z350z's Avatar
z350z
Charter Member #13
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally posted by 3rdpower
Yeah, again, lose some weight seems to be the theme but hey... as of lately, the Z hasn't really been a light weight roadrocket - it's been a cruiser. We are not back to a solid mix of cruiser / racer IMHO.
Unlike some others, this review was actually positive about the weight and commented on how low it was:

"The new Z car weighs in at 3,188 pounds, so the engine isn't pushing around a lot of unnecessary weight. "
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
sales@czp
Engine
33
Sep 23, 2019 03:30 PM
ars88
Zs & Gs For Sale
18
Apr 4, 2016 07:52 AM
Li1ag
Exhaust
1
Sep 28, 2015 02:07 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:37 PM.