Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

If Nissan built this concept for us

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 09:32 PM
  #1  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default If Nissan built this concept for us

instead would you have gone for it?
Attached Thumbnails If Nissan built this concept for us-fdfe4d7d.jpg  
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 09:42 PM
  #2  
BullishZ's Avatar
BullishZ
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,780
Likes: 0
From: Costa Mesa, CA
Default

Nope...

That's the other version of the Z they were considering, and it has more of that retro look of the original 240...

To me, I think it looks like a baseball cap... I would not have gone for it.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 09:43 PM
  #3  
bigone's Avatar
bigone
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
From: miami
Default

only if it had radical performance stats

i mean Z06 type numbers
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 09:43 PM
  #4  
LA-Z's Avatar
LA-Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 273
Likes: 0
From: L.A.
Default

Honestly, Prob. Not. Pretty ugly, and unremarkable. Esp. paired up against the new RX-8, Coopers, etc.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 09:50 PM
  #5  
3rdpower's Avatar
3rdpower
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 982
Likes: 0
From: In a Village!
Default

Retro look is okay as long as it has the numbers to back up the change in times
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 09:52 PM
  #6  
fatZo's Avatar
fatZo
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 569
Likes: 0
From: Dagobah
Thumbs up yep

With some minor cosmetic modifications (door handles, etc.) I would probably go for it. The concept looks very similar to a pre- 1999 Carrera, and I just love the shape of that car!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 09:55 PM
  #7  
mdouvris's Avatar
mdouvris
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 243
Likes: 0
From: Plainfield,IL
Default I dunno....

It looks ok. Not as cool as the one we are getting. I really like those wheels though.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 09:55 PM
  #8  
bobbyz's Avatar
bobbyz
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 633
Likes: 1
From: Toronto, Canada
Default

yup.
Would have considered it. Would depend on stats.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 09:57 PM
  #9  
ZON's Avatar
ZON
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,059
Likes: 0
From: norcal
Default

Originally posted by bobbyz
yup.
Would have considered it. Would depend on stats.
Oh ya, bye the way it was planned to use a 4 banger! Would not have nearly been as potent as the 350.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 10:07 PM
  #10  
MatthewZ's Avatar
MatthewZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
From: NJ
Default

nope
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 10:10 PM
  #11  
RainmanZ's Avatar
RainmanZ
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 592
Likes: 0
From: Fort Payne, AL
Thumbs down Nope !

Not a chance. We are so much more fortunate with the car we are getting. Both looks and performance are great. Had nissan chosen a 4 banger the whole Z rebirth would have fallen flat. Too many great cars out there now.

IMHO
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 10:11 PM
  #12  
roberto350z's Avatar
roberto350z
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,253
Likes: 0
From: Sun Diego
Default

1: I love the retro look and I love my 280z. If this style had been given the thumbs up, then minor things would have chaged like the handles, tail lights, stance, rims etc. I would have definetely gone with it.

2: if this style had been oked, the car would definetly NOT have been fitted with a 4 banger. Nissan was thinking about it, but the Z community would have changed that idea for sure.

...my opinion is that this original idea was intended with a 4-banger, people had a hissy fit, then nissan realized that they couldnt shoe horn the VQ into that tiny design without elongating the hood just a bit more and violating modern design regulations. So they made the car bigger, then realized that it looked funny bigger and changed the design all together. (blatant uneducated speculation)

ANYWAY! with those looks, a 4banger producing maybe 225hp and weighing in at 2600 lbs, it would be AWESOME!

Last edited by roberto350z; Jul 19, 2002 at 10:15 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 10:20 PM
  #13  
POWERZ's Avatar
POWERZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
From: Des Moines
Default No way

Don't care for the style at all.

They got it right the second time though!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 10:33 PM
  #14  
BILZ Z's Avatar
BILZ Z
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 454
Likes: 0
From: Bay Village OH
Default

NT. won't even go into the reasons. Let's just say... fugllly.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 10:59 PM
  #15  
Todd's Avatar
Todd
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
From: Chesapeake, VA
Thumbs down

No. The front and rear are awful looking!
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 11:13 PM
  #17  
yzarCritS's Avatar
yzarCritS
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Reston, Va
Default

Maybe.

There is no way I would have pre-ordered it without knowing the stats since I don't find it as visually appealing.
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2002 | 11:17 PM
  #18  
Alang's Avatar
Alang
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

All depends on the performance numbers, but probably not. That concept was slated for a 4 cyl, and I have personally sworn off 4 cyls for the rest of my life (with the possible exception of a lotus turbo).
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2002 | 12:21 AM
  #19  
Sanderman's Avatar
Sanderman
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 340
Likes: 0
From: Massachusetts
Default

Never, never, never!
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2002 | 12:35 AM
  #20  
2003z's Avatar
2003z
New Member
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 4,959
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

No way
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:36 AM.