How come the 350Z isn't supercar?
02-08-2007, 03:30 AM
#43
+1 on the srt4... I live at a place with 3000ft DA regularly and I still pull them easily... not sure what this nonsense is about them being faster...
+1 also on this thread being ridiculous... anyone who is confused about why the 350z isn't considered a super car obviously has NO CLUE what a supercar even is...
+1 also on this thread being ridiculous... anyone who is confused about why the 350z isn't considered a super car obviously has NO CLUE what a supercar even is...
02-08-2007, 05:52 AM
#46
Registered User
iTrader: (12)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 740
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know about all of you, but to me the Z LOOKS like a supercar. I mean granted it's not but even after 5 yrs, Z's still get a lot of looks and people who aren't enthusiasts still wonder what kinda car it is. Maybe the front is a little conservative, but all in all to a lot of people it looks like a supercar. Slap on a turbo and body kit and you're good!
02-08-2007, 06:37 AM
#47
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Appleton, WI
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by norapat01
Don't you guy think that it kindda funny? In the past 300ZX are consider a japanese super car along with '93+ Supra TT, 3000GT, '93+ RX-7 TT. I'm not including GT-Rs, Evo, and Sti of the past because they are not available in US. But back then, those cars are a "wow". Today with 350z and Rx-8, they consider more like a sport car.
However, the NSX still consider a japanese supercar from then 'till now.
However, the NSX still consider a japanese supercar from then 'till now.
02-08-2007, 07:01 AM
#51
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 7,951
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by silverZ2006
Thats a 40k$ car.
costs $64,750 to be exact.Sorry this pic shows an Elise.
Last edited by Ztalker; 02-08-2007 at 10:31 AM.
02-08-2007, 10:27 AM
#56
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Scottsdale Az
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Not to start a vs. thread here but stock for stock the srt-4 should beat the Z in the 1/4 mile with equal drivers. Better hp to weight ratio and similar gearing. Granted it is fwd but by the end of the 1/4 it should pull ahead.
Btw the Z is not a supercar because it doesn't have the performance, looks, engineering, or quality of a supercar. Simple as that. It is a great bottom-mid end sports car.
Btw the Z is not a supercar because it doesn't have the performance, looks, engineering, or quality of a supercar. Simple as that. It is a great bottom-mid end sports car.
02-08-2007, 11:28 AM
#57
A "Supercar" must have a pricetag in the top 5 percentile and Performance in the top 5 Percentile. It must also be a limited production run, making it exclusive to own.
= More Expensive and Higher Performance than 95% of the cars on the market and of a limited run.
That makes cars like the Viper, 911, Ford GT and Z06, "Borderline" Anything below those cares are not.
= More Expensive and Higher Performance than 95% of the cars on the market and of a limited run.
That makes cars like the Viper, 911, Ford GT and Z06, "Borderline" Anything below those cares are not.
Last edited by sq40; 02-08-2007 at 11:31 AM.
