Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Vehicle Death Rate

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2007 | 09:25 AM
  #21  
TheGest's Avatar
TheGest
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Thats pretty bad, were worse than mustangs
Old 04-19-2007 | 09:50 AM
  #22  
TheGest's Avatar
TheGest
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,598
Likes: 0
From: California
Default

Originally Posted by Kegsbane
Wow. Look at the G35 all the way on the low end with 11.

Maybe this says something about the maturity of drivers, seeing as how the G is more expensive? Probably impossible to tell, but that's still very impressive scores for the G.
there talking about the sedan too
Old 04-19-2007 | 09:52 AM
  #23  
FairladyZX's Avatar
FairladyZX
Registered User
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,910
Likes: 0
From: 春城 - LA
Default

HIGHEST RATES OF DRIVER DEATH
More than 140 driver deaths per million registered vehicle years,
2001-04 models during calendar years 2002-05
ES OF DRIVER DEATH
on registered vehicle years,
ing calendar years 2002-05

Chevrolet Blazer 2dr 2WD SUV midsize
Acura RSX 2dr car small
Nissan 350Z sports car midsize
Kia Spectra hatchback 4dr car small
Pontiac Sunfire 2dr car small
Kia Rio 4dr car mini
Chevrolet Cavalier 2dr car small
Mitsubishi Eclipse 2dr car small
Dodge Neon 4dr car small
Pontiac Grand Am 2dr car midsize
Chevrolet Cavalier 4dr car small
Ford Mustang sports car midsize
Ford Ranger 4WD pickup small
Mazda B series 2WD pickup small
Mitsubishi Eclipse convertible sports car small
Mitsubishi Montero Sport 2WD SUV midsize



http://www.iihs.org/sr/pdfs/sr4204.pdf
Old 04-19-2007 | 10:09 AM
  #24  
SargentZ's Avatar
SargentZ
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,529
Likes: 0
From: The Lou
Default

the most important factor in determining insurance is "Damageability" The more it cost the insurance company to fix your car the more your insurance will be.
Old 04-19-2007 | 10:19 AM
  #25  
35oZephyR's Avatar
35oZephyR
Registered User
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 8,617
Likes: 1
From: san diego
Default

This should be a banner at every Nissan dealership:


Go ahead parents, buy your newly liscensed teen a 350z!
"Small sporty cars had among the highest death rates, which IIHS attributes to risk-taking drivers and the size of the vehicles."

Other sportcars would have definitely made that list if they sold more.
I think the Z is fairly safe. We just have more knuckleheads on the road trying stupid **** behind the wheels.
Old 04-19-2007 | 10:34 AM
  #26  
ke0ki2k's Avatar
ke0ki2k
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
From: Knoxville, Tennessee
Default

Originally Posted by CRIDDA
Great it looks like insurance is going to go up again. Moms and Dads quit buying your kids 350Z's and buy them a Chevy. It sucks when **** like this comes out b/c insurance companies are quick to throw these numbers in your face when you premium increases. If only peolple respected their cars and did not treat them like they are toys, we prob. would not see as many deadly accidents that we see. Yet another good reason for a 16 year old not to be behind the wheel of a sports car that was bought by Mom and Dad.
im 18..does that mean im cooler than a 16 y/o with a Z? somebody bought their 16 year old daughter a 03' Z last week. and this idiot junior who will without a doubt wreck one conned his rents into buying him one too
Old 04-19-2007 | 10:37 AM
  #27  
angelzhope720's Avatar
angelzhope720
Registered User
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 872
Likes: 0
From: Downtown Los Angeles
Default

i'm actually very surprised evos/sti's didn't make the list. however i wasn't surprised at all for the rsx.
Old 04-19-2007 | 10:41 AM
  #28  
alan86's Avatar
alan86
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,451
Likes: 0
From: NORCAL
Default

im glad i have side airbags
Old 04-19-2007 | 10:48 AM
  #29  
Chako135's Avatar
Chako135
Registered User
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 690
Likes: 1
From: South Florida
Default

the rsx always wins!!! ugh!
Old 04-19-2007 | 11:13 AM
  #30  
drewb612's Avatar
drewb612
Registered User
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 228
Likes: 0
From: Boston
Default

Originally Posted by davids
This is misleading, RSX kills more drivers because it is too fast. Please only purchase an RSX if you can handle it!!!

omfg rofl
Old 04-19-2007 | 11:20 AM
  #31  
S8ER95Z's Avatar
S8ER95Z
New Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 849
Likes: 0
From: Quad Cities
Default

Top of the list?? You guys have a way to go if you want to make the top 5

It does suck that the crashes have nothing to do with the safety of the car.. just the people driving.
Old 04-19-2007 | 11:24 AM
  #32  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,754
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Question

So about how long do I have to live?
Old 04-19-2007 | 11:54 AM
  #33  
Track's Avatar
Track
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Gigglin
I wanted to point out something about our beloved 350z being in the top 3 of this list. We have the lowest sales figures compared to most of the cars on the list. So if you take that into consideration, the 350z has the highest vehicle death rate per 1000 vehicles sold.

I feel that this website being popular with 350z enthusiasts should have a sticky thread, with this chart linked permanently, so people know exactly what they are getting into.
For this to mean anything, it would have to be adjusted for miles driven, not units sold. For instance, Z-cars tend to be sold to younger (and more enthusiastic) drivers who use it as a primary vehicle.

In order to be valid, this study needs to incorporate variables such as the driver's state of mind (such as intoxicated). It would also require a breakdown of age to have any validity at all. Furthermore, just a list of fatalities alone is meaningless. It does not even break it down by velocity (speed), road conditions, or any other extraneous variable such as age, gender (of the driver) or any other demographic.

For the most part, this is useless for extracting any real or valid observations about the car, and is extremely unscientific. On the other hand, it is an interesting post with some useful observations and a well-needed warning for us Type A's and "adrenalin junkies."

If this "study" indicates anything at all, it is that the average Z owner drives more "enthusiastically" and is more likely to take chances. Life on the edge has its consequences.


Gotta keep my foot right down;
If I had wings I'd leave the ground.
Buning in the outside lane,
People think that I'm insane!

The day I take a bend too fast,
Judgement that could be my last!
I'll be wiped right off the slate;
Don't wait up 'cause I'll be late!
Old 04-19-2007 | 12:01 PM
  #34  
Sean's Avatar
Sean
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 8,719
Likes: 2
From: nj
Default

Originally Posted by davidv
So about how long do I have to live?

http://www.deathclock.com/
Old 04-19-2007 | 12:05 PM
  #35  
Track's Avatar
Track
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 745
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

Originally Posted by Kegsbane
Dude, death RATE. Death RATE. Do you even know what that means?
"Deaths are per million vehicle years. One vehicle registered for 12 months is a vehicle year."

This operational definition completely ignores miles driven or the demographic of the driver or what kinda crazy stuff the driver was pulling when he/she off'd themselves.

To be valid, the study would at least have to eliminate deaths from coked-up teenagers who wrapped their Z around a tree doing 130 mph on a surface street while looking for the joint they dropped while getting a hand-job.
Old 04-19-2007 | 12:08 PM
  #36  
Kegsbane's Avatar
Kegsbane
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 485
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, VA
Default

Originally Posted by Gigglin
My bad. Didn't read carefully enough. Was assuming it's the number of deaths last year.
It's okay. I just don't want any more bad info passed around than humanly possible.
Old 04-19-2007 | 12:29 PM
  #37  
FirstZ's Avatar
FirstZ
Banned
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 238
Likes: 0
From: Southern, MA
Default

Originally Posted by TheGest
Thats pretty bad, were worse than mustangs

The odds are much higher for 350Z vrs the mustang. about 2 out of ever 1,000 350Z owners died on average???


My crude estimate:

90,000 = 350Z sold
193 = Dead

193/90,000 = .0214 * 1,000 = 2.1

WOW....
Old 04-19-2007 | 12:40 PM
  #38  
JCat's Avatar
JCat
---------------
Premier Member
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,987
Likes: 73
From: JC in Atlanta Georgia
Default

Originally Posted by Chako135
the rsx always wins!!! ugh!
We need volunteers so that we can beat the RSX.

Any nominations?
Old 04-19-2007 | 12:46 PM
  #39  
savvy's Avatar
savvy
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 4,124
Likes: 0
From: Salem, New Hampshire
Default

RSX has a high death rate because it is believed that if man were to ever see god he would instantly die from the magnificance.
Old 04-19-2007 | 01:32 PM
  #40  
JunkStory's Avatar
JunkStory
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,801
Likes: 0
From: CANADA
Default

I'm not surprised. I see kids everywhere driving 350z's and RSX's.

If Porsche 911 were sold in the $30k range, then the 911 would be on top of the list with 5000 deaths per year.

Last edited by JunkStory; 04-19-2007 at 01:35 PM.


Quick Reply: Vehicle Death Rate



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:56 PM.