How much a z understeers
#21
New Member
It's probably all about tires. I suspect that the Wikipedia statistics-graph listing understeer values is based upon running cars with new OEM tires.
My experience
I ran OEM Bridgestone Potenza RE040 (225/45-18 front and 245/45-18 rear) on my 2003 Performance model. When the car and it's tires were new, I noticed a slight amount of understeer (probably due to the staggered setup/size). As the front started to wear (quickly due to the feathering problem), understeer went from hardly noticeable to an ugly handling characteristic. I took the car to the dealer who replaced my feathered 225/45-18 front tires with new ones (OEM Bridgestone Potenza RE040 225/45-18). Nice... new front tires... but handling was awful since my OEM Bridgestone Potenza RE040 (245/45-18 rears) now had significant wear and needed replacement. With new fronts and worn rears, I was actually experiencing oversteer, even with a staggered setup. I also noticed that stiff sidewall plus worn tire-tread potentially equals disaster.
So... I mounted Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3 245/40-18 on the front and 245/45-18 on the rear ("square setup"). What a great setup! ...neutral handling, sticks like glue on dry roads, grips very well in the rain, and the ride is comfortable. I'm sure that Michelin PS2's would provide the same great result. Soft-flex sidewalls make the difference. I'm very critical of stiff sidewalls and the fact that drivers using these tires consistently report crashes.
--Spike
My experience
I ran OEM Bridgestone Potenza RE040 (225/45-18 front and 245/45-18 rear) on my 2003 Performance model. When the car and it's tires were new, I noticed a slight amount of understeer (probably due to the staggered setup/size). As the front started to wear (quickly due to the feathering problem), understeer went from hardly noticeable to an ugly handling characteristic. I took the car to the dealer who replaced my feathered 225/45-18 front tires with new ones (OEM Bridgestone Potenza RE040 225/45-18). Nice... new front tires... but handling was awful since my OEM Bridgestone Potenza RE040 (245/45-18 rears) now had significant wear and needed replacement. With new fronts and worn rears, I was actually experiencing oversteer, even with a staggered setup. I also noticed that stiff sidewall plus worn tire-tread potentially equals disaster.
So... I mounted Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3 245/40-18 on the front and 245/45-18 on the rear ("square setup"). What a great setup! ...neutral handling, sticks like glue on dry roads, grips very well in the rain, and the ride is comfortable. I'm sure that Michelin PS2's would provide the same great result. Soft-flex sidewalls make the difference. I'm very critical of stiff sidewalls and the fact that drivers using these tires consistently report crashes.
--Spike
#24
Originally Posted by davidv
Interesting numbers. Are the cars running the same tires on the same surface on the same day?
BWahahahh!!!
Thanks for keeping it real Davidv
#26
350Z-holic
iTrader: (26)
Originally Posted by Spike100
It's probably all about tires. I suspect that the Wikipedia statistics-graph listing understeer values is based upon running cars with new OEM tires.
#27
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Since the number is the degrees of steering required to produce lateral G's (from what i can tell), wouldn't steering ratio have a large part to do with this? If the Z has much a quicker steering ratio than any of the other car's then the whole point of the comparison is moot. Right...?
#28
Former Sponsor
iTrader: (564)
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 19,266
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes
on
5 Posts
how on earth can they quantify this without knowing the alignment settings, or tire pressure, or temperature of the pavement? Also, the test method used is a great way to determine overal lateral G (constant diameter turn that you simply go round and round in, while increasing speed), but a very poor way to determine under or oversteer
you realize any WIKI is only as good as the person typing the info.
you realize any WIKI is only as good as the person typing the info.
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 318
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kegsbane
...
You have to link to a CREDIBLE SOURCE for this to mean anything. Wikipedia, which I absolutely love for general info, is not a credible source.
You have to link to a CREDIBLE SOURCE for this to mean anything. Wikipedia, which I absolutely love for general info, is not a credible source.
As to the understeer issue...very few road cars don't understeer in stock configuration. Of the two, under is way easier for a novice driver (99.999% of all drivers) to handle than oversteer is. Plus weight distribution is only one factor in whether a car has the tendency to over or understeer. Distribution of traction is just as or even more important.
If you put bicycle tires on the front (ever seen the wheels they put on Champcars to roll them around the paddock?) the weight distribution would still be about the same, but the traction distribution would shift way to the rear, and understeer would be about all it would do.
#30
350Z-holic
iTrader: (26)
I posted this info on my Autocross forum and the general belief is that this is totally bogus. Some of the rankings just don't make sense. Since we can't find the actual article from the magazine that described the test, it's hard for anybody to tell what's really being measured and under what conditions.
Last edited by DavesZ#3; 08-29-2007 at 01:56 PM.
#32
Originally Posted by CUxtopher
mine understeers like no other at the Autox, prolly trying to take the turns ways too fast! driver mod ftw
#33
Sponsor
IOS Performance
IOS Performance
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
One of the first things I did was grab a set of 245's and throw them on the stock wheels up front. Quick fix until my aftermarket wheels arrive and I can run 275's or even 285's on all four corners. Just that little change made the car handle a LOT better. It's much more neutral now at the limit. It'll come out and bite you if you drive like an idiot (especially in a base model with no vdc), but it's definitely a lot better overall imho.
#34
New Member
Justin... I'm beginning to think that an optimum wheel/tire setup on the Z is this:
Nismo wheels (or any high quality wheel) 18/8.5" front and 18/9.5" rear, with tires measuring 245/40-18" front and 275/40-18" rear. That setup makes the Z handle really well. To get the best and most safe handling, you choose tires with moderately flexible sidewalls (good choices are Michelin PS2's or Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3's).
You could translate the 18" wheels and tires sizes to 19" wheels with appropriately sized tires. With 19" wheels you have better esthetics, but I doubt you get any advantages in handling.
--Spike
Nismo wheels (or any high quality wheel) 18/8.5" front and 18/9.5" rear, with tires measuring 245/40-18" front and 275/40-18" rear. That setup makes the Z handle really well. To get the best and most safe handling, you choose tires with moderately flexible sidewalls (good choices are Michelin PS2's or Goodyear Eagle F1 GS-D3's).
You could translate the 18" wheels and tires sizes to 19" wheels with appropriately sized tires. With 19" wheels you have better esthetics, but I doubt you get any advantages in handling.
--Spike
#35
350Z-holic
iTrader: (26)
Actually, your "optimum" setup ought to understeer worse than the OEM setup. The OEM setup had only a 20mm diff in tire widths between front and rear. Your setup has a 30mm diff in tire width which would make understeer even worse. Remember, the reason behind the different tire widths in the first place is to induce understeer by design from the factory.
#36
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just my $0.02, but I don't believe the amount of under/oversteer a car has is directly proportional to how well/poor it does on the track. I've tracked some front wheeldrive cars with lethal understeer (GTI, Integra to name a couple) and have blown away every single other car in my class.
My experience with Z so far is that it's actualy fairly prone to understeer with the stock tires and a hot track...just saying, not sure I buy that data in Wiki.
Again, just my $0.02.
My experience with Z so far is that it's actualy fairly prone to understeer with the stock tires and a hot track...just saying, not sure I buy that data in Wiki.
Again, just my $0.02.
#37
New Member
Originally Posted by DavesZ#3
Actually, your "optimum" setup ought to understeer worse than the OEM setup. The OEM setup had only a 20mm diff in tire widths between front and rear. Your setup has a 30mm diff in tire width which would make understeer even worse. Remember, the reason behind the different tire widths in the first place is to induce understeer by design from the factory.
--Spike
#38
Sponsor
IOS Performance
IOS Performance
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Z-T
Just my $0.02, but I don't believe the amount of under/oversteer a car has is directly proportional to how well/poor it does on the track. I've tracked some front wheeldrive cars with lethal understeer (GTI, Integra to name a couple) and have blown away every single other car in my class.
#39
Registered User
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 561
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Justin@IOS
You may have been faster than the other cars in those sessions. But, if the car you drove was more neutral, do you think it would have been easier to drive and/or faster around the track? With many of the fwd cars I've owned, being able to rotate the car made a pretty significant difference in lap times.
I was just saying that it's not always a 1:1 relationship between under/oversteer and handling. The right car, track, setup, etc (and driver ) can make a big difference (the GTI does well on autoX tracks but lousy on an open track, etc.).
The Z is actually very well balanced-just as good, even better, as an E46 M3 in my opinion.
#40
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Dallas, Tx
Posts: 326
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Useless misinformation. I have driven many of the cars on the list on road courses and how much the cars actually understeered has nothing to do with those numbers.