Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

287 crank or rwhp?

Old Aug 17, 2002 | 10:41 AM
  #1  
Phyte's Avatar
Phyte
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default 287 crank or rwhp?

I assume this figure is crack HP?

Phyte
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2002 | 10:42 AM
  #2  
nizl's Avatar
nizl
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
From: siphonband.com
Default Re: 287 crank or rwhp?

Originally posted by Phyte
I assume this figure is crack HP?
Do I know you? I think I just saw you in South Central!
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2002 | 11:50 AM
  #4  
Phyte's Avatar
Phyte
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Default

LMAO.. 12 beers does that to you. <b>Crank</b> HP you bastids

Phyte
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2002 | 11:53 AM
  #5  
Jill's Avatar
Jill
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,702
Likes: 1
From: Haddonfield, NJ
Default Re: Re: 287 crank or rwhp?

Originally posted by nizl

Do I know you? I think I just saw you in South Central!
LOL...
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2002 | 04:57 PM
  #6  
Apexi350z's Avatar
Apexi350z
Charter Member #50
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,552
Likes: 0
From: Houston, Texas
Default

I read somewhere that the Z has around 244hp at the wheel. I think the new Sport Compact Car may have this figure.
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2002 | 06:23 PM
  #7  
John's Avatar
John
...
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Default

Yeah, SCC dyno'd it at 244whp and 249wtq... that's a marginal drivetrain loss, so I am certain that Nissan has underrated the Z...
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2002 | 07:16 PM
  #8  
Dr Bonz's Avatar
Dr Bonz
Charter Member #19
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 6,490
Likes: 8
From: Zainoland
Default

That's 15% loss isn't it? (244/287=.85)

Is that good?
Reply
Old Aug 17, 2002 | 07:30 PM
  #9  
John's Avatar
John
...
Premier Member
iTrader: (17)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 4,869
Likes: 1
From: San Diego, CA
Default

That's amazing... but look at the torque...

I actually mis-stated the torque above... they got 238wtq... 13.1% drivetrain loss...

Last edited by John; Aug 17, 2002 at 07:33 PM.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM
350Z_Al
Exterior & Interior
133
Oct 29, 2020 07:44 PM
foxsmp26
New Owners
13
Sep 25, 2015 09:48 AM
Shane86
Autocross/Road
2
Sep 17, 2015 05:33 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:43 PM.