Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

2008 reliability.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 07:03 PM
  #1  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default 2008 reliability.



It has taken awhile, but Consumer Reports has collected sufficient data to publish 2008 reliability. And it appears that the last 350Z model year, 2008, is the most reliable. The assumption that 2003 is a lemon while other years are stellar is not supported by scientific data. In fact the 2003 is as reliable as either the 2005 or 2007.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 07:31 PM
  #2  
Goku350z2007's Avatar
Goku350z2007
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 0
From: Rahway, N.J.
Default

i thought 07 and 08 are supose to be the same.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 08:20 PM
  #3  
Emski's Avatar
Emski
New Member
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 833
Likes: 10
From: Denver, CO
Default

I am guessing there is not enough time yet for things to break.
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2009 | 08:28 PM
  #4  
nismonian's Avatar
nismonian
New Member
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,165
Likes: 1
From: Tampa Bay
Default

how are the brakes on the 07 better than 08?

they're the same exact brakes
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 02:06 AM
  #5  
jerseymike68's Avatar
jerseymike68
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Riverside, CA
Default

Thanks.. Welcome..
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 03:08 AM
  #6  
DavesZ#3's Avatar
DavesZ#3
350Z-holic
Premier Member
20 Year Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 15,887
Likes: 23
From: Louisiana
Default

If you watch those carefully, over the years, more and more white and black dots appear as the cars on the roads start experiencing problems and more people start reporting them.

I can pretty much guarantee that it won't look that red next year.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 04:10 AM
  #7  
chrisjersey06's Avatar
chrisjersey06
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Yea, something isn't adding up. I highly doubt that 06 has a more reliable engine than other years with all the oil consumptions reported. And I can't see 07's having more reliable transmissions than other years due to all the slaves and trannys that needed to be replaced so far.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 04:29 AM
  #8  
yogipower's Avatar
yogipower
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (16)
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,113
Likes: 2
From: Georgia
Default

thanks for the info davidv.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 05:25 AM
  #9  
INTIMAZY's Avatar
INTIMAZY
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 5
From: Staten Island / NYC
Default

Originally Posted by chrisjersey06
Yea, something isn't adding up. I highly doubt that 06 has a more reliable engine than other years with all the oil consumptions reported. And I can't see 07's having more reliable transmissions than other years due to all the slaves and trannys that needed to be replaced so far.
Keep in mind not everyone had oil consumption problems with the 06's. Most people that don't have the problem will never start a thread saying "Hey! my car does NOT burn oil!" It was profound enough to cause Nissan to act on it, but the true number of people affected will probably never be revealed.
For example,
I don't personally know of any 06 owners (half a dozen or so) with consumption engines besides the members on here that report it. However, I do know of two local 07 and an 08 owners with random engine surging that the local dealer has not been able to do anything about. Yet, I don't think that issue has really been brought up on here.
Oil consumption is a "bigger" issue to complain about so I think that's why it is repeated so much on here.

Also, the clutch problems with the 07s are probably minor compared to getting trannys replaced in the early cars.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 06:52 AM
  #10  
scrillasherv's Avatar
scrillasherv
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 161
Likes: 0
From: san diego
Default

I'm looking at the 03's, where the "transmission minor and major" have black dots. What does the minor and major mean?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 12:40 PM
  #11  
davidv's Avatar
davidv
Thread Starter
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 42,753
Likes: 11
From: Tucson, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by scrillasherv
I'm looking at the 03's, where the "transmission minor and major" have black dots. What does the minor and major mean?
Transmission, major. Transmission rebuild or replacement, torque converter, premature clutch replacement.

Transmission, minor. Gear selector or linkage, coolers and lines, rough shifting, slipping transmission, leaks, transmission computer, transmission sensor or solenoid, clutch adjustment, hydraulics (clutch master or slave cylinder).
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 01:32 PM
  #12  
ovalnegri's Avatar
ovalnegri
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
From: Puerto Rico
Default

I know I'm going to get flamed but, I really can understand the chart at all. What is the legend about the dots, what does each specifically symbolize?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 02:52 PM
  #13  
zete350's Avatar
zete350
New Member
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,319
Likes: 1
From: San Gabriel, CA
Default

^Basically, black is bad (no waisis), red is good.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 03:32 PM
  #14  
F34RL355's Avatar
F34RL355
Banned
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,006
Likes: 0
From: london
Default

nice glad im just picked up an 08
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 05:34 PM
  #15  
chrisjersey06's Avatar
chrisjersey06
Registered User
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 806
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
Default

Originally Posted by INTIMAZY
Keep in mind not everyone had oil consumption problems with the 06's. Most people that don't have the problem will never start a thread saying "Hey! my car does NOT burn oil!" It was profound enough to cause Nissan to act on it, but the true number of people affected will probably never be revealed.
For example,
I don't personally know of any 06 owners (half a dozen or so) with consumption engines besides the members on here that report it. However, I do know of two local 07 and an 08 owners with random engine surging that the local dealer has not been able to do anything about. Yet, I don't think that issue has really been brought up on here.
Oil consumption is a "bigger" issue to complain about so I think that's why it is repeated so much on here.

Also, the clutch problems with the 07s are probably minor compared to getting trannys replaced in the early cars.
Guess you're right about that. A lot of 03's needed new trannys, but mine's still good so far with 40k, but I drive pretty easy. Luck of the draw I suppose.

I'm actually feel bad for recommending an 07 to my friend. I told him the HR is the way to go, so he got a CPO'd one at the dealer with 10k on the clock. Its only been a few months so far and its already needed 2 slave cylinders and a new transmission. Its good that its under warranty so its all covered, but a real pain to keep having stuff break and you never get to drive the thing! I understand that its hit or miss though..
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 09:23 PM
  #16  
winchman's Avatar
winchman
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 5
From: Georgia
Default

"...he got a CPO'd one at the dealer..."

What does CPO'd mean? Did a chief petty officer do something nasty with it?
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2009 | 09:33 PM
  #17  
exZilaration's Avatar
exZilaration
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 296
Likes: 0
From: Flo Rida
Default

Too early to stamp the 08's just yet. This chart isn't really factual IMO
Good find davidv
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 04:58 AM
  #18  
INTIMAZY's Avatar
INTIMAZY
New Member
15 Year Member
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 929
Likes: 5
From: Staten Island / NYC
Default

Originally Posted by chrisjersey06
Guess you're right about that. A lot of 03's needed new trannys, but mine's still good so far with 40k, but I drive pretty easy. Luck of the draw I suppose.

I'm actually feel bad for recommending an 07 to my friend. I told him the HR is the way to go, so he got a CPO'd one at the dealer with 10k on the clock. Its only been a few months so far and its already needed 2 slave cylinders and a new transmission. Its good that its under warranty so its all covered, but a real pain to keep having stuff break and you never get to drive the thing! I understand that its hit or miss though..
Even the 03/04 tranny replacements are overstated on here. Just about ANY Z is a good year to buy. They all have minor pluses and minuses. This car is still the most reliable overall of any car I have owned. Naturally, an 03 will have more time to have a failure especially in comparison to an 08. I'm sure the long term consensus will even out across all the Z's.
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 05:08 AM
  #19  
SOLO-350Z's Avatar
SOLO-350Z
'12 TL SH-AWD
Premier Member
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,348
Likes: 1
From: Alamo
Default

Originally Posted by Goku350z2007
i thought 07 and 08 are supose to be the same.
Yep they are. Nothing changed. That is why I take these reports with a grain of salt. They even said the GS from Lexus had a ton of problems and it doesn't. lol
Reply
Old Nov 5, 2009 | 10:29 AM
  #20  
AML225's Avatar
AML225
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 109
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles, CA
Default

I haven't had a SINGLE problem (NOT ONE) with my 2008 enthusiast purchased June 08. This is in drastic contrast to the 2001 audi a4 1.8t I owned before hand that averaged 18 full days in the shop a year. That's just under 5% of the year in the shop. Not to mention the car was purchased for $14,000 and I spent a little over $7,000 on maintenance and repairs in the 4 years I owned it.

END RANT. GO Z!!!
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:36 AM.