Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

My 350Z Rant

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:10 AM
  #21  
AndyB's Avatar
AndyB
New Member
20 Year Member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,389
Likes: 5
From: Connecticut
Default Suggestion

Originally posted by JFritz
Well Bill, lets make this a flame. Why do folks get so damn defensive.

From what I've seen most folks run there 350Z's around the low 14 range.

Anyways here's my list for comparible cars.

Ford Mustang Cobra $32K 1/4 Time 13.4
Mitsubishi Evolution $30K 1/4 time 13.7?
Subaru STI $31K 1/4 time 13.4?

By comparison, yes I think the 350Z is slow.

I don't care if it's a v-8, v-6 or inline 4, what difference does it make.....we're talking about sports cars here.

I agree with other people. If what you want is "best bang for the buck 1/4 mile / drag car" then the Neon is for you. It is truly a bargain.

For ME (maybe not you, but ME) I hate the looks of the neon and I loath front wheel drive wish-they-were-sports-cars. Torque steer and unfavorable load transfer are two major reasons.

The EVO and the STI are fugly and they are not QUITE as quick the numbers might lead you to believe. They launch AWESOME since they have AWD, but that skews the 1/4 mile numbers. In real street day-to-day driving you probably won't really be hard launching at every light. (unless you can afford a new clutch every 24K miles).

As for the flames, you did come in here and insult the Z. If the flames suprised you then you are probably too imature to handle a fast car anyway.

Last edited by AndyB; Oct 16, 2003 at 09:13 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:13 AM
  #22  
JFritz's Avatar
JFritz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 1
From: Tempe, AZ
Default

Well there are some decent posts on here.

I will say this. With all my harsh remarks about the Z, I may still end up with one in 6 months.

With every car I have bought, and or looked at, I give my honest straight up opinion. If it hurts your feelings, too bad. I'm just trying to get some opinions on why or what made you go your route. I only hope most of the Z owners on here that aren't responding, can take a few negatives about their car.

beamm, look up coherent in a dictionary before you use the word. you've also ignored my comments about the cobra. that's fine.....where did you see that i dont like high priced aftermarkt products? read my posts with an open mind you idiot.

well the 93z28 i bought in 95, first year of college. a mullet car? lol maybe now it is, but back then, it wasn't.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:15 AM
  #23  
jackwhale's Avatar
jackwhale
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 694
Likes: 0
From: Alamo, CA
Default

If you want a car that will be the absolute best at any one thing, the 350Z is not for you. Its a great car right of the showroom at driving mountain roads at high speeds. The 0-60 numbers are really good but not the absolute best. The braking is phenomenal but not the absolute best.

If you're going to be upset when any other car beats you, especially one costs less, then the 350Z is not for you. Whoever thought that if one buys a Z then absolutely no car that costs less will beat me. Any good mod mechanic can make a car go faster than the Z.

If you want a drag car that wins all the time, the 350Z is not for you.

I've had my car for a year and 20K and I don't envy any other cars. I like a lot of cars but I've never reversed my decision to wait in line and beg the dealer for one.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #24  
Ralphus's Avatar
Ralphus
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

One sentence: The Z is not the BEST in every category, but it excels in all of them, therefore it's the most well balanced car for my money.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:17 AM
  #25  
Conceyted's Avatar
Conceyted
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Originally posted by JFritz
Well there are some decent posts on here.

I will say this. With all my harsh remarks about the Z, I may still end up with one in 6 months.

With every car I have bought, and or looked at, I give my honest straight up opinion. If it hurts your feelings, too bad. I'm just trying to get some opinions on why or what made you go your route. I only hope most of the Z owners on here that aren't responding, can take a few negatives about their car.

beamm, look up coherent in a dictionary before you use the word. you've also ignored my comments about the cobra. that's fine.....where did you see that i dont like high priced aftermarkt products? read my posts with an open mind you idiot.

well the 93z28 i bought in 95, first year of college. a mullet car? lol maybe now it is, but back then, it wasn't.
****ing troll... Now your starting to instult our members. Get the **** out.... You sound like you have a bias'ed towards american cars anyway. Don't come on OUR forums and instult OUR members. What a dipshit...
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:19 AM
  #26  
MannishBoy's Avatar
MannishBoy
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 5,282
Likes: 0
From: Nashville
Default

Originally posted by JFritz
if Nissan still made the 92 TT Z they used too, i probably wouldn't even think twice. or maybe the 96 Toyota Supra. or the 93 RX7. Sure they were expensive in their day, but those are performance cars.
All unprofitable (add in F-Bodies), so no longer manufactured. There is a reason those cars died out. The reason is they were too pricey for their perceived value to their target buyers, so sales didn't meet a point where they made money.

The new Supra is supposedly targeting similar price/performance markets as the Z is, because that seems to be a sweet spot where sales are high enough to make the cars profitable.

The Z does have compromises, but it is still a good sport guy value and a fun car to drive. If you don't like it, fine, buy the Neon or Cobra. Both are fine for what they are, but are totally different types of cars from the Z.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:30 AM
  #27  
buzzdsm's Avatar
buzzdsm
New Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,731
Likes: 0
From: Midwest
Default

By looking at some of the cars you've had in the past, I'd guess quality is not a big issue. Go drive a T/A or Cobra with about 40K+ miles and you'll see what I mean. These cars fall apart and after about 2 years they are worth 1/2 of what you paid.

If you don't mind the styling I think the Sti is a great car. Some people like myself can't get past the styling.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:39 AM
  #28  
cincyspider's Avatar
cincyspider
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 227
Likes: 0
From: Cincinnati, OH
Default

Dude...I sold my 300ZX for the 350!

Am I sorry??

NO! The styling and handling are far superior. I DO miss the headlights on the 300....they are the BEST driving headlights I have EVER SEEN on any car. High beams were much superior to the 350.

eh!
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:43 AM
  #29  
JFritz's Avatar
JFritz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 1
From: Tempe, AZ
Default

conceyted, I've owned american sports cars for the most part. cool off. i'm not a troll.

listen,

93z28, the money pit this **** went through 3 transmissions, ignition, and about $3K other worth of sh-t that wasn't under warranty.

98 cobra fast car with few mods. i ran a 13.3 in the 1/4 but i also wrecked it when a tire blew at the track. $8K in damage that i had to pay off. plus 2 transmissions out.

98 ws6, fast, not nimble, and definitly a beast. i only kept it for a year, nice looking, fast, but i lost my license for drag racing. so it had to go.

also, when i say step down for the 300zx to a 350z, i meant performance wise.

Ralph, that was short but sweet.

manish, well put.

why do i feel so threatened when you guys tell me to buy a neon. lol stop.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 09:52 AM
  #30  
Ralphus's Avatar
Ralphus
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 700
Likes: 0
From: Houston, TX
Default

Really why I like the Z personally, besides what I mentioned above about the Z being good in every category...

I've had 3 CRX's, one street, one SCCA racer, and one motor swapped turbo beast. Overall the CRX is my favorite car, and the 350z is like a more refined version of the same car. (Sorry if that's insulting to any Z owners).
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 10:00 AM
  #31  
mxpx_8's Avatar
mxpx_8
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Originally posted by jackwhale
If you want a car that will be the absolute best at any one thing, the 350Z is not for you. Its a great car right of the showroom at driving mountain roads at high speeds. The 0-60 numbers are really good but not the absolute best. The braking is phenomenal but not the absolute best.

If you're going to be upset when any other car beats you, especially one costs less, then the 350Z is not for you. Whoever thought that if one buys a Z then absolutely no car that costs less will beat me. Any good mod mechanic can make a car go faster than the Z.

If you want a drag car that wins all the time, the 350Z is not for you.

I've had my car for a year and 20K and I don't envy any other cars. I like a lot of cars but I've never reversed my decision to wait in line and beg the dealer for one.
Had to bump this one just in case you missed it. It is the truth...
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 10:05 AM
  #32  
D'oh's Avatar
D'oh
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 1
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default

All the cars you mentioned are fast compared to the average car. Of course, what you think of the 350Z will depend on what you compare it to.

I guess I'm not sure what you are really wanting to know. You compare the Z to these other, similarly performing cars, and when someone says maybe the Neon is best for you, you get all bent out of shape. If you are taking that as an insult and then why are you offering it as an alternative to the Z in the first place?

As for the 300ZX, it is not really a step up or down relative to the 350Z. More of a step sideways. The 300ZXTT is marginally faster in a straight line, but will not handle as well. The Brakes on the 350 are better, and it is lighter. To think that the 300 is going to perform significantly better than the 350 is mistaken.

As far as handling goes, the Z's slalom times are very good (comparable to S2000, Boxster, etc) and the skidpad results seem to range between .88 and .92 depending on the magazine. Not too shabby at all.

I bought the Z because none of the other cars you mentioned were available at the time. If I were to buy now, I'd still take the Z because none of the other cars come close as a total package. I'd consider the Cobra, but I can't handle the looks of the EVO or STI, or the 4 doors. I'm already faster than the Neon in the AutoX (well, the two that I've raced with), and it has the same door problem as the others. I really respect all the other cars, but they just aren't for me.

-D'oh!
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 10:12 AM
  #33  
mxpx_8's Avatar
mxpx_8
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 204
Likes: 0
From: .
Default

Here is another way to look at it.

When you walk out of a nice restarut and walk to the passengers side of your car to open it for your girlfriend/boyfriend think of how they will feel. Dont be so selfish hehe

Neon vs. Z

If you buy the Neon you can tell her/him. Hey baby/honey this car is almost a full second faster than that dumb Z car!

If you buy the Z you can say I know this car is alomost a second slower than the Neon, but hey its a Z.

Ok you get the idea I'm sure.

SInce it does sound like you are not sure what you want, I now say you should go with a street bike. Nothing faster right?! You can then take the Z, Neon, and every car out there!

PROBLEM SOLVED
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 10:13 AM
  #34  
failsafe's Avatar
failsafe
....for your health
Premier Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 1
From: Raider Nation
Default

Go test drive them all and then make your decision.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 10:13 AM
  #35  
rouxeny's Avatar
rouxeny
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 2,774
Likes: 0
From: Honolulu
Default

If you're looking for straight line performance, the Z is not for you. As has been said by many people before me, the Z is a good all around performer. It does many things well, but is not really excellent at any of them. Well, I think that it's styling is pretty exceptional. However, you can say similar things about many other cars, including many of the Z's competitors, ie. the Boxster, S2000, TT, etc. Sports cars in this price range are essentially exercises in compromise. If you want all out unbeatable performance, spend the cash and get a Zonda. However, for 30K, the Z is a great car.

Personally, I think that the fact the Z shares an engine with many other cars is a plus. It's nice to have a hand built, race spec engine like say a NSX, but I'm sure it costs a lot more to develop, sell and fix. With the Z, any mechanic familiar with an Altima pretty much knows what's going on under the hood.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 10:21 AM
  #36  
JFritz's Avatar
JFritz
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 534
Likes: 1
From: Tempe, AZ
Default

I only offered the Neon as a performance comparison, not as an option to buy. like one of the other members said the other day, a turd is still a turd, no matter how much money you put in to it.

the 350z definitly has class.

i'm telling you, as much as I "dis" it, it's definitly in my top 2.

street bike? in az? haha, i want to live.

i always thought the 300Z had a better slalom time?
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 10:23 AM
  #37  
Conceyted's Avatar
Conceyted
Registered User
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,311
Likes: 0
From: New Orleans, LA
Default

Originally posted by mxpx_8
Here is another way to look at it.

When you walk out of a nice restarut and walk to the passengers side of your car to open it for your girlfriend/boyfriend think of how they will feel. Dont be so selfish hehe

Neon vs. Z

If you buy the Neon you can tell her/him. Hey baby/honey this car is almost a full second faster than that dumb Z car!

If you buy the Z you can say I know this car is alomost a second slower than the Neon, but hey its a Z.

Ok you get the idea I'm sure.

SInce it does sound like you are not sure what you want, I now say you should go with a street bike. Nothing faster right?! You can then take the Z, Neon, and every car out there!

PROBLEM SOLVED
But the neon is NOT a full second faster than the z. The z is actually equal or faster stock for stock.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 10:25 AM
  #38  
bobbydoedoe's Avatar
bobbydoedoe
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, CA
Default

go test drive a 04 S2k and then decide of urself
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 11:05 AM
  #39  
VandyZ's Avatar
VandyZ
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 3,702
Likes: 1
From: Nashville, TN
Default

The Z is a ROAD RACER. Not a DRAG RACER. Infact, no Z car has ever been built to be a DRAG RACER. The fact that the Z does do the 0-60 in 5.5 and the 1/4 in high 13s to low 14's says that it is a great mix and very versatile. And your comment about it not being quick in the slalom, must I remind you that it bettered several sports cars like the Boxster, S2000, and yes the cobra and the past numbers for the T/A’s. As for lateral g’s, put some more aggressive rubber on the wheels and you are topping those cars again. You need to drive all the cars you have listed and pick your favorite. I don’t think (from seeing your past cars) you will like the Z. It is a powerful car, comparatively, but you wont get the same feeling as if you are in aforementioned muscle cars. Oh yeah, the neon srt stock will not out run a Z from a roll or a stop, street tested, owner approved! But with a $5 mod it can be a beast, as most turbo cars can be.

Last edited by VandyZ; Oct 16, 2003 at 11:07 AM.
Reply
Old Oct 16, 2003 | 11:10 AM
  #40  
Yielar's Avatar
Yielar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: British Columbia, Canada
Default

I own a super black on charcol 03 350Z Performance Edition with a 6 spd manual transmition. I can't say enough good things about it but I'll say a few of the high lights that come to mind. The handling is very impressive. Lets just say that a friend of mine let me drive his c5 2000 Vet for a summer and compared the the 350Z it handles like a pregnant lady on roller skates ! The power is very linear unlike any other car I have driven. The amount of after market bolt on parts for the 350Z are simply insane which is one of the things I really enjoy. Do a search for some after market parts for the S2000, RX8 heck even the Z4 and see how many options there are? The amount of looks I get driving it are simply incredible and you would have to drive one to really see what I mean. I have been driving down the highway and had people pull up beside me, roll down there window, and tell me how much they love my car and I'm not making this up ! I've had people as old as 80 and young as 5 compliment me on the Z. It's unbelievable really. I get total strangers giving me the thumbs up as I drive by ! My girlfriend can't believe people love the car so much. The only thing that I am not looking forward to is parking her for the winter. I've put 13,000 Kms on since June 15....at least I won't be racking up the kms over the winter months....unless I get the urge to go for a spin weather permitting.

If you want a cheap car to burn around in get the Neon! If you want a car that looks like a beefed up Miata get the s2k. If you want a car that makes you want to go for drives to " nowhere " and sit in the garage and stare at it........get the Z.



Yielar
Attached Thumbnails My 350Z Rant-img_0182.jpg  
Reply



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:31 PM.