Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Whats the point of a twin turbo?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 05:34 AM
  #1  
meeno's Avatar
meeno
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: jersey
Default Whats the point of a twin turbo?

Why do older Z's ( and soon, new ones) have to have TT's? Why not just one big one? Just curious, because I think that they use the twin turbos out of tradition.

correct me if i'm wrong
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 06:02 AM
  #2  
tbcz's Avatar
tbcz
New Member
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,644
Likes: 0
From: Philly burbs
Default

There are definite benefits to using two small turbos as opposed to one large one. I think the main benefit is that small ones spool up faster and therefore exhibit reduced turbo lag, making for smoother power bands.

BTW...where did you hear that there will "new ones"?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 06:04 AM
  #3  
JeepRage's Avatar
JeepRage
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Hingham, MA
Default Re: Whats the point of a twin turbo?

Originally posted by meeno
Why do older Z's ( and soon, new ones) have to have TT's? Why not just one big one? Just curious, because I think that they use the twin turbos out of tradition.

correct me if i'm wrong
Two types of TT sort of. Bi turbo means two (usually smaller) turbos running seperatly feeding each half of an engine so they can spool up faster. The other twin turbo set up can have one smaller and one larger turbo. They are sequential (one after the other), the smaller spools up first and feeds the larger giving more power.

I had an Audi S4 that was Bi-turbo, helping reduce the lag, but in terms of out-right tuning, usually short of a TT set up. (although i still had 330hp and 380tq)
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:24 AM
  #4  
ViZion's Avatar
ViZion
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 497
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX yall
Default

Originally posted by tbcz

BTW...where did you hear that there will "new ones"?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 08:26 AM
  #5  
Traffic's Avatar
Traffic
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 1
From: NJ
Default

He refers to most likely, the Skyline. Another reason there is no single turbo for the Z is space. It's tough to fit all the plumbing with twins. A single turbo, as tuners have found out, is impossible to jam in the engine bay.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 09:48 AM
  #6  
Alang's Avatar
Alang
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
From: San Diego
Default

Not trying to jack the thread, but how does a single turbo get powered in a V application. Do you have to plumb both sides to the turbo, or would you leave one side "open" and the other side powering the turbo. Neither sounds good to me.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 10:18 AM
  #7  
meeno's Avatar
meeno
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 168
Likes: 0
From: jersey
Default

Originally posted by tbcz
There are definite benefits to using two small turbos as opposed to one large one. I think the main benefit is that small ones spool up faster and therefore exhibit reduced turbo lag, making for smoother power bands.

BTW...where did you hear that there will "new ones"?
I read somewhere on this forum that they might be making a TT 350Z soon as an upgraded model...maybe it was BS

In any case there are already kits out there to my knowledge that are TT (I think greddy has one, not sure.)
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 03:54 PM
  #8  
Jetpilot718's Avatar
Jetpilot718
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 0
From: Queens, NYC
Default Re: Re: Whats the point of a twin turbo?

Originally posted by JeepRage
Two types of TT sort of. Bi turbo means two (usually smaller) turbos running seperatly feeding each half of an engine so they can spool up faster. The other twin turbo set up can have one smaller and one larger turbo. They are sequential (one after the other), the smaller spools up first and feeds the larger giving more power.

I had an Audi S4 that was Bi-turbo, helping reduce the lag, but in terms of out-right tuning, usually short of a TT set up. (although i still had 330hp and 380tq)

Hey, not to be a dink, but I think ya got that backwards. Im pretty sure Bi-turbo means that they do not both run at the same time, for example, a small turbo for low rpm and then the big turbo kicking in at the higher rpm band. I was under the impression that a twin turbo setup runs both turbs at the same time, feeding half the engine each.

I could be very wrong, but in the interest of education, anyone else have any idea what the definition of each is??

BTW, S4's are SICK when modded up.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 05:41 PM
  #9  
JeepRage's Avatar
JeepRage
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 138
Likes: 0
From: Hingham, MA
Default Re: Re: Re: Whats the point of a twin turbo?

Originally posted by Jetpilot718
Hey, not to be a dink, but I think ya got that backwards. Im pretty sure Bi-turbo means that they do not both run at the same time, for example, a small turbo for low rpm and then the big turbo kicking in at the higher rpm band. I was under the impression that a twin turbo setup runs both turbs at the same time, feeding half the engine each.

I could be very wrong, but in the interest of education, anyone else have any idea what the definition of each is??

BTW, S4's are SICK when modded up.

bi-turbo is two smaller independent turbos (aka my S4) or Audi is pulling mind games on me (although i think the 300zx was similar and called twin turbo).

Last edited by JeepRage; Jan 29, 2004 at 05:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 05:48 PM
  #10  
fdao's Avatar
fdao
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,628
Likes: 1
From: Hawaii
Default Re: Re: Re: Whats the point of a twin turbo?

Originally posted by Jetpilot718
I could be very wrong, but in the interest of education, anyone else have any idea what the definition of each is??

BTW, S4's are SICK when modded up.
I believe JeepRage is right.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 05:50 PM
  #11  
vic grant's Avatar
vic grant
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 135
Likes: 0
From: atlanta, ga
Default

If you had room one turbo would be fine. Doing one side only...you're kidding, right?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 05:52 PM
  #12  
ares's Avatar
ares
Veteran
Premier Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,816
Likes: 2
From: ATL
Default

yeah, bi's feed together, twin is sequential.

I think they get plumbed together with a turbo manifold, though Im sketchy how that works.

a turbo application is not the same as NA. backpressure isnt a concern. the turbo is creating as much backpressure as it possibly can. what happens after that doesnt matter as far as 1 or 2 pipes, you just need enough piping to fit all the additional exhaust.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 06:02 PM
  #13  
ZPower's Avatar
ZPower
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 250
Likes: 0
From: MA
Default

IIRC from a friend of mine who owns a speed shop and drives an Audi S4, BITurbo is nothing more than Audi's way of saying "twin turbo". I don't think it pertains to a specific setup (two turbos boosting in parallel vs. sequentially). Don't quote me on that though-it's been a while since I've talked to him.

Jeeprage pretty much said it. Twin turbos are just a way to reduce lag by using a small turbo down low and then using a big turbo up high (sequentially). As far as when both turbos boost in parallel, each to a bank (V engines only), I'm not sure why but maybe something to do with boosting 3 cylinders vs. 6 cylinders as a load for each turbo? Anyone here in mechanics? Volumetric efficiency?

Last edited by ZPower; Jan 29, 2004 at 06:06 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2004 | 09:51 PM
  #14  
D'oh's Avatar
D'oh
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,510
Likes: 1
From: Santa Cruz, CA
Default

From what I've seen, there is no naming standard for turbos. Bi-turbo, twin-turbo; they can mean the same thing (usually two independent turbos boosting into the same intake manifold).

From what I remember, it seems like sequential turbo's (a small one for low boost that @ certain RPMS gets bypassed and the exhaust goes to power a bigger one) were always specifically noted as such. I think the Supra and RX-7 had twin sequential turbos.

The downside to running a single turbo off one side of a V engine is that you are only getting 1/2 the exhaust gasses to power the turbo but you are still boosting the intake which is feeding all six cylinders. This means that you will either need to use a very small turbo to avoid lag and just have very low boost (probably not worth the effort) or you need to figure out how to pipe in the exhaust gasses from the other side of the engine. In the Z, I think it was easier to use two turbos than it was to try and pipe the exhaust gasses from one side to the other.

-D'oh!
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2004 | 05:52 AM
  #15  
Dissolved's Avatar
Dissolved
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: ________
Default

bi turbo=twin turbo. Like the z32. Both turbos at the same time (2 chicks at the same time )

sequential=2nd turbo comes in on preset RPM. MKIV has sequential twin turbos.

Single turbos are better on straight 6 like the poopra. Personally I like the z32 design better (twin throttle bodies) v6
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
XM 1
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jul 10, 2022 07:44 AM
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 AM.