Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

trying to make a TT reliable...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 01:33 PM
  #1  
Scorch268's Avatar
Scorch268
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default trying to make a TT reliable...

Hey guys, I had some thoughts regarding the reliablity of the TT V35. Let me know what you think.

Often many people simply say that forced induction is bad for an engine out of ignorance or group think. As a former aircraft mechanic, I can tell you EXACTLY what is bad for an engine. I have seen some engines go 4000 hours between overhauls (and then, only valves replaced) and others make it less than 300. The key component of these, regardless of forced induction, was fuel management, more precicely, EGT and CHT. As you may or may not know, detonation causes the cylinder head temperature (a thermal barrier between the cylinder and the exhaust gasses) to become disrupted. This can destroy and engine in seconds because the very hot EGT is transfered directly to the cylinder, and the resulting metalurgy is affected (IE, holes in the cylinder, skuffs in the walls, etc) The best solution to this issue in aviation up until recently is been to run pig rich, where the excess fuel causes lower EGTS and lower CHT's. The negative aspect to this is fouled plugs, valve deposits, and much higher fuel consumption.
Up until recently (not including the big radials of WW2), the only way to run a fuel injected a/c engine was on the rich side of the EGT graph

due to the poorly distributed air and fuel (remember, one **** for fuel and non aerodynamic intake manifold) A company devoloped injectors for Lycoming engines which, through a bunch of techno mumbo jumbo, evens the distribution. This allows one to run on the lean side of the EGT curve, where the excess air, not fuel, cools the EGT and the resulting CHT. What occurs is a cleaner burn, lower fuel consumption, and longer engine life.
Well, what does all this mean for the V35. I think that the knowledge from aviation can certainly carry over to the automotive applications in that, if we can monitor each CHT and each cylinders EGT, we can adjust the a/f ratio of each cylinder and not just the engine (keep in mind that some distributions of a/f are so lousy that an engine is essentially 6 small engines running in parrallel) With this technology, we can encorportate a "cruise mode" that will run on the lean side of the curve, resulting in lower emmissions, lower fuel consumptions, and longer engine life. By altering the a/f of each cylinder, we can make reliablity of forced induction applications a reality. Let me know what you think

Last edited by Scorch268; Mar 14, 2004 at 01:41 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 04:16 PM
  #2  
FLY BY Z's Avatar
FLY BY Z
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,700
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

You can do this with a stand alone engine management system, of which many exist, however, they are out of many people's price ranges.
Reply
Old Mar 14, 2004 | 07:05 PM
  #3  
Scorch268's Avatar
Scorch268
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
Default

Im surprised more people havent chimed in on this. I am not aware of any stand alone system that can control individual injector pulse and distribution.
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2004 | 09:31 PM
  #4  
nycgspot's Avatar
nycgspot
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
From: Queens, NY
Default

try posted in the Forced Induction part of the site (i think its under the Engine/Drivetrain section). a lot of more technically savvy people would probably have more input there
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Lt_Ballzacki
Brakes & Suspension
39
Aug 6, 2021 06:19 AM
MM'08_350Z
VQ35HR
225
Apr 22, 2021 09:42 PM
sales@czp
Engine
33
Sep 23, 2019 03:30 PM
Tochigi_236
Feedback & Suggestions for Our Forum
8
Sep 27, 2015 03:40 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:05 PM.