Notices
2003-2009 Nissan 350Z

Idling vs Constantly Restarting

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 20, 2004 | 04:31 PM
  #1  
b3n84's Avatar
b3n84
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 88
Likes: 0
From: qnz, nyc
Default Idling vs Constantly Restarting

I start and stop a lot, waiting to pick up people and the like. Would it be better for the engine to idle for 5 mins or shut off the engine for 5 and restart. I'm not sure which is the lesser of two evils here or if it'd make a big difference. Any thoughts? What about even shorter lengths of time like 3 mins? 10 mins?
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2004 | 04:46 PM
  #2  
The Brickyard Rat's Avatar
The Brickyard Rat
350Z-holic
Premier Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 2
From: Sacramento, Ca.
Default

This is a "gut" reaction but I'd say under 5 minutes leave it running; over 5, shut it off.
Reply
Old Apr 20, 2004 | 04:47 PM
  #3  
failsafe's Avatar
failsafe
....for your health
Premier Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 5,592
Likes: 1
From: Raider Nation
Default

I've always heard it's better to let your car idle for a few minutes then to keep starting. The cats stay warm and do their job when you let the car idle.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 04:22 AM
  #4  
yooda's Avatar
yooda
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 118
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Default

I agree, probably best to leave your car running.

This car company (very big huge company) that I used to work for was developing this engine that was specifically designed to start and stop a million times a day. Maybe a million is exaggerating, but this is what they were trying to accomplish:

When you're driving in traffic, you waste a lot of gas because you're constantly accelerating and then decelerating. The engine was supposed to "shut off" when you take your foot off the gas peddle and "start up" when you put your foot back on. Logically you save gas because your engines not running when you're just sitting around or when your decelerating.

It was supposed to be so seemless that you wouldn't even notice the engine was off or on. And of course it was supposed to happen a million times a day.

Anyways, thats the future. Of course the hydrogen fuel cells they're starting to put on the roads are really exciting.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 05:06 AM
  #5  
boyze's Avatar
boyze
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 96
Likes: 0
From: Pa
Default

I believe one of the dominant engine life factors is still the number of thermal cycles an engine eperiences. In other words for every shut down/start up cycle the engine experiences a large thermal stress cycle that adds to the engine degradation. Of course, this is weighed against wearout parts and mechanical stressed parts, .... I'm not sure how engine designers make that trade these days.

My preference is let it idle for a few if I know I will be moving momentarily.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 08:28 AM
  #6  
mofoz's Avatar
mofoz
New Member
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,670
Likes: 1
From: Prospect Heights, IL
Default

definetly leave it running. i think it would be easier on the cats and the engine.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2004 | 05:15 PM
  #7  
Nezian's Avatar
Nezian
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
From: Maryland
Default

what might the cut off time be for idleing....like 10 minutes or somthing like that?

Nathan
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
etkms
Engine & Drivetrain
29
Jun 19, 2022 06:30 PM
liqalu04
Engine & Drivetrain
31
Jan 2, 2022 12:58 PM
Colombo
Forced Induction
35
Nov 9, 2020 10:27 AM
05UltraYellow
Maintenance & Repair
4
Sep 24, 2015 05:41 AM
Darkspy
VQ35HR
0
Sep 7, 2015 09:09 PM




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:26 AM.