Notices
2009+ 370Z General discussion and news for the Z34 (2009+) Nissan 370z with the new 3.7-liter V6

A "baby" 350 Z in 2009?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-11-2007, 09:35 AM
  #1  
trains1937
New Member
Thread Starter
 
trains1937's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 646
Received 116 Likes on 13 Posts
Default A "baby" 350 Z in 2009?

Check this out. It was on the website for Automobile magazine.


http://www.automobilemag.com/new_and..._Nissan_BabyZ/
Old 07-11-2007, 09:42 AM
  #2  
04DBZ
Registered User
 
04DBZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 357
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

lol it looks the same to me
Old 07-11-2007, 09:46 AM
  #3  
tomiegunzz
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
tomiegunzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Beantown, MA
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

r
Old 07-11-2007, 09:52 AM
  #4  
The Brickyard Rat
350Z-holic
iTrader: (1)
 
The Brickyard Rat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Sacramento, Ca.
Posts: 6,940
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

This was posted a few weeks back, Train.

I'll believe it when I see it at a dealer.
Old 07-11-2007, 09:54 AM
  #5  
groove269
Registered User
 
groove269's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Venice, CA
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

i thought nissan said they wouldnt never drastically change the body of the 350z. plus its all about the inside that counts!
Old 07-11-2007, 09:58 AM
  #6  
inTgr8r
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
inTgr8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tomiegunzz
r
e
Old 07-11-2007, 10:01 AM
  #7  
Tubbs
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Tubbs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: vancouver
Posts: 7,192
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

If I could have the same engine, with a smaller, lighter body... I'd be happy with that.
Old 07-11-2007, 10:03 AM
  #8  
MUZZY
Registered User
iTrader: (28)
 
MUZZY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Delaware?
Posts: 2,605
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by inTgr8r
e
p
Old 07-11-2007, 10:10 AM
  #9  
Lawy'dU
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Lawy'dU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: globetrotter
Posts: 1,770
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MUZZY
p
O
Old 07-11-2007, 10:26 AM
  #10  
daz311x
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
daz311x's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 837
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

s
Old 07-11-2007, 10:36 AM
  #11  
tomiegunzz
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
tomiegunzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Beantown, MA
Posts: 1,625
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

^lmao worst ever T
Old 07-11-2007, 11:11 AM
  #12  
brandonanix
Registered User
iTrader: (8)
 
brandonanix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: OC and Rancho Cucamonga, CA
Posts: 671
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I like how the rear wheel arch was cut out, looks better to me, and I think the flat black looks awsome if it was done nicely
Old 07-11-2007, 11:31 AM
  #13  
SupersayianNeo
Registered User
 
SupersayianNeo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: mASS
Posts: 32
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by tomiegunzz
r

Originally Posted by inTgr8r
e

Originally Posted by MUZZY
p

Originally Posted by Lawy'dU
O
Originally Posted by daz311x
s

Originally Posted by tomiegunzz
^lmao worst ever T
....
Old 07-11-2007, 11:50 AM
  #14  
Greedy4nismo
New Member
iTrader: (2)
 
Greedy4nismo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Indiana
Posts: 563
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

looks identical, i can't see any difference..if there is, we are talking less than 2 inches difference
Old 07-11-2007, 11:53 AM
  #15  
inTgr8r
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
inTgr8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Greedy4nismo
looks identical, i can't see any difference..if there is, we are talking less than 2 inches difference
If you look at the roof & down the middle of the door you can see the cut lines.

edmunds
Instead of employing exotic materials to reduce the Z-car's weight, it looks like Nissan is simply whittling down the chassis to a smaller size. The current Z has a wheelbase of 104.3 inches, and while the next-gen Z isn't likely to match the short 95.1-inch wheelbase of the Porsche Cayman, we're guessing something between the two numbers is a safe bet.
Old 07-11-2007, 12:07 PM
  #16  
vaughn1576
Registered User
iTrader: (3)
 
vaughn1576's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 815
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Old old news...
Old 07-11-2007, 04:40 PM
  #17  
alexfair
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
alexfair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Los Angeles, California
Posts: 162
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Greedy4nismo
looks identical, i can't see any difference..if there is, we are talking less than 2 inches difference

Hmm and you think those are the final bumpers? nah once they get the wheel arches nice and tight, I am sure this new Z will be shorter and lighter.
Old 07-12-2007, 04:50 AM
  #18  
RBull
Registered User
 
RBull's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: G35driver.com
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by alexfair
Hmm and you think those are the final bumpers? nah once they get the wheel arches nice and tight, I am sure this new Z will be shorter and lighter.
Kind of looks that way to me too. I think it's most noticeable in the door shortness and front overhang.
Old 07-12-2007, 05:45 AM
  #19  
350Zenophile
New Member
iTrader: (20)
 
350Zenophile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 4,350
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Post isn't completely worthless...few new shots I hadn't seen before and probably the only pub that actually thinks this is not going to be the next gen Z although their logic is flawed.

They think it will be a smaller vehicle because "you can see a second set of A-pillars, denoting a narrower car than the 350Z?" This is right before the author states that the car is equipped with a roll-cage which is clearly seen in the photo provided. Clearly not a "second set of A-pillars."



Then they state but ignore the significance of the brake package, wheel size wheel track and performance character of the cars being tested against.
Old 07-12-2007, 06:33 AM
  #20  
inTgr8r
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
inTgr8r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 350Zenophile
Post isn't completely worthless...few new shots I hadn't seen before and probably the only pub that actually thinks this is not going to be the next gen Z although their logic is flawed.
....
Definitely....
The GT-R, the 350Z and then a 3rd baby Z???
LOL... I think not!


Quick Reply: A "baby" 350 Z in 2009?



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:41 AM.