Not the best pic, but I saw a 370Z
Originally Posted by smxtmpr34
nice spot, the 370Z deff looks like nissan is listening to is customers, smaller wheel base, more power, and less weight(hopefully)...
Registered User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Phoenix
Originally Posted by Zmazing03
I'd agree on this. Not that the Z is a pig, but I bet they could take some weight out of it without redesignign the entire thing. Since before they even confirmed it would be called 370Z they have been saying shorter wheel based, about 200 lbs less (I believe that is correct) and the VQ37 in the current G. Considering the Z will do 13s off the show-room floor, I'd certainly assume the same here. I see no way it would be slower than the current Z. 200 lbs is .2 tenths without more power. 330 HP, 3100 lbs? Low to mid 13s @ 10x all day.
Ladies and Gentlemen, get ready to have your world rocked.
Originally Posted by kinyu
I know the pros claim 13.7 for the 350, but honestly, I've seen a lot of them run at the track and have never seen one get under 14.0.
I've never run mine at the track, but just my take.
Also, is anyone else almost angry at this point that this car is being kept from us for so long? I mean, there are a few new cars coming out next year, and we not only have seen them, but know all their specs. It's getting very frustrating.
I've never run mine at the track, but just my take.
Also, is anyone else almost angry at this point that this car is being kept from us for so long? I mean, there are a few new cars coming out next year, and we not only have seen them, but know all their specs. It's getting very frustrating.
Originally Posted by Endgame
No, no.. I would say more like high 12's. Again, I compare the numbers from the E46 M3; similar HP and torque numbers, but the Z is much lighter.
Ladies and Gentlemen, get ready to have your world rocked.
Ladies and Gentlemen, get ready to have your world rocked.
+1. Numerous people on this forum have ran low 13s with their HR Zs. High 12s would be my bet.
Originally Posted by kinyu
I know the pros claim 13.7 for the 350, but honestly, I've seen a lot of them run at the track and have never seen one get under 14.0.
I've never run mine at the track, but just my take.
Also, is anyone else almost angry at this point that this car is being kept from us for so long? I mean, there are a few new cars coming out next year, and we not only have seen them, but know all their specs. It's getting very frustrating.
I've never run mine at the track, but just my take.
Also, is anyone else almost angry at this point that this car is being kept from us for so long? I mean, there are a few new cars coming out next year, and we not only have seen them, but know all their specs. It's getting very frustrating.
Registered User
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Boston, MA
Originally Posted by kinyu
Also, is anyone else almost angry at this point that this car is being kept from us for so long? I mean, there are a few new cars coming out next year, and we not only have seen them, but know all their specs. It's getting very frustrating.
I want to see this thing in the dark gray/gunmetal wheel combo of the GTR...
Originally Posted by bboypuertoroc
Looks like the truck was parked. I should kill you for not getting out your car and taking better, closer, in-detail pics.
You should have gotten into it and checked the redline/popped the hood and peep the engine...
definite high 12's stock mid 12's with minor bolt ons or sticky tires.... considering theoretically a stock hr z now has the trap speed for 12's.. just needs a nice set of rear tires or DRs. my stock AUTO ROADSTER went 13.4 haha so im calling 12's no doubt
yea that things gonna be quick as hell, solely off that pic it looks like it has a saggy *** and its real small, but it has nice rims, that one definately looks moded, i dont think the stock height will be that low
