When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have to disagree with you 100% on that one. I think they are a defining element of the new car. They add a more muscular and agressive stance that the car needs.
The 350Z has a nice stance, to be sure, but the "fat rear" of the 350 has been replaced with a "tight rear" and "strong legs"..
It has a lot of the "Sexy Curves" of the 911, but distinctly "Z"
Not even close. The 911 has a wide bumper to match the fenders giving it a truely aggressive wide look. The 370's narrow bumper starts to abrupt. It should gradually get wider and would look a lot better.
Last edited by highflyinkilla; Nov 3, 2008 at 12:25 PM.
I like the way the rear fenders extend further down on the wheel becoming sort of a mud flap. It looks better then the z rear. But I think the tail lights and strange bump on the hatch are taking away from the smoothness of the design.
Looking at these comparisons really makes me see that the z33 looks better then the z34.
The rear on the 370Z looks way more aggressive. Imagine some thick rubber under those fenders. Mmmmmm.
LOL...I did put thick rubber under those fenders...Those are much wider than the original pic.... As much as Id love to put Viper sized tires back there in real life it would be pointless given the power unless you are pushing over 500 to the wheels...Heres the original..
Last edited by SnakeBitten; Nov 4, 2008 at 05:23 AM.